The Fund for Climate and Environment
FINAL REPORT
MINOR Intervention and longer-term intervention
The total report may not exceed 8 pages (excluding Annex 1.)
Aim
The final report is the Danish organisation’s report to the Fund for Climate and Environment. Your reflections are important in terms of documentation and learning. It is therefore not the aim that the partner organisation(s) complete(s) the report on its/their own.
The final report can be used as a tool in your partnership to strengthen transparency and joint responsibility as described in “Position Paper No. 4. Partnership and Strengthening of Civil Society”.
The final report is also an element in the Danish organisation’s ”track record” and can be taken into account in future assessments of applications from the Danish organisation with the same or other partners.
External evaluation
For interventions above 2 mio. DKK the external evaluation report must be enclosed if not already shared with CISU.
Danish applicant organisationIntervention titel
Contact person, name and e-mail
Journal number
Country(-ies)
Period for intervention
Total budget / Actual expenditure
Date / Person responsible (Signature)
E-mail address / Person responsible (Block letters)
1. Objectives and results achieved
1.1. Explain in point form how the intervention has reached each objective and indicators and/or expected changes which have been described in the original application.
Fulfilment of the objectives in % from 0 – 100 %
(100 % is given if the objective has been completely met and 0 % is given if the objective has not been met at all)
Fulfilment of objective 1Fulfilment of objective 2
Fulfilment of objective 3
Target group as described in part C1 in the original application.
Estimated primary target group the intervention has affected (number of people)Estimated secondary target group the intervention has involved (number of people)
The quantitative data is used for CISU’s cross-cutting monitoring.
1.2. Describe how the strategy has led to the results/effects which were described in the original application, including whether adjustments or changes in the intervention’s strategy was taken underway and what effect they had.
1.3. Did implementation progress as planned? If there were activities which were planned but not implemented, describe in point form and give a short explanation (only for the period since the last status report).
1.4. Describe problems, opportunities and/or contextual changes which have influenced the intervention in a positive or negative direction, if any.
1.5. Describe how the experiences for this intervention can be used to improve/adjust the strategy for any future intervention.
2. Monitoring and learning2.1. How has important learning been gathered, systematised and shared?
2.2. How will the learning be used in the future by the Danish partner, the South partners and in the partnership?
2.3. Which tools have you used for monitoring and/or capacity building – if any? (please check the boxes below)
Mango Health CheckAccountability Dialogue Tool
Other tool, if yes, which?
The information is for CISU’s monitoring and should not be perceived as a requirement to use the tools mentioned.
3. Partnerships and networking3.1. Give a specific account of how the intervention has contributed to strengthening i) your partners, ii) your own organisation, iii) your partnership and iv) participating networks (if any).
3.2. If networks have participated in the intervention, please describe the added value of the network to the intervention.
3.3. For projects over 2 million: Describe how the intervention has sharpened the partners’ profile and role as civil society actors (as described in A.4. in the original application).
4. Sustainability of the intervention4.1. What initiatives have been taken to support the sustainability of the intervention?
4.2. How have you supported your partners and/or networks in exploring opportunities for other funding and/or capacity building?
5. What difference has the intervention made?Please write (maximum 10 lines) about the difference the intervention has made - eg. the most significant changes that have occurred as a result of the intervention. The text may relate to the summary, you made in the application. The text will be published on CISU’s website / world map.
In addition, you are welcome to share stories from the intervention (eg. with a focus on a person from the target group, and the like) that can highlight specific results and CISU may use in communicating about the Fund.
Please share photos, web pages, etc. with CISU which illustrate the results of the intervention.
6. Information in Denmark(Fill out only if there is a budget line for ”Information in Denmark”.)
6.1. Describe in point form the implemented activities.
6.2. Explain how the information work has reached the objectives described in the application.
7. Follow up – answer if relevant7.1. Describe actions taken as a result of any “good advice” which was given in the original letter of approbation from the Assessment Committee. (Must be answered if “good advice” was given in the letter of approbation and answer has not been given in previous status reports)
If you have chosen not to follow the “good advice”, please explain why.
7.2. If it was mentioned in the application that you or your partner did not meet CISU’s financial standards when applying the Fund, please describe the initiatives taken in relation to this. (Must be answered if an answer has not been given in previous status reports)
8. Additional comments or reflections
ANNEX 1: OUTCOMES AND OUTPUTS – quantitative status on implementation
For grants for 2014 and onwards: To measure the success of the Climate and Environment Fund as a support facility aimed at promoting civil society interventions in the field of climate and environment with a focus on advocacy, the below mentioned cross cutting output and outcome indicators are introduced.
The indicators are considered to be relevant for most interventions granted by the Fund.
For grants given in 2013: These statistics are not a requirement. If you are able to complete all or parts of this annex, it would be appreciated.
If you have any questions or comments, please contact us at .
Outcome indicators
Organisation:Journal nr: / Expected Target / Actual result
1. / The number of poor or marginalised people facing climate or environmental challenges whose lives will be positively affected by capacity building and advocacy on sustainable development.
2. / The number of people who have been involved in networks/organisations.
3. / The number of initiatives/attempts to influence made by civil society in developing countries to sub-national and/or national authorities plus regional and international gatherings in order to influence a progressive agenda vis-a-vis international processes on climate and environment.
Explanatory notes:
Outcome 1: The number of poor or marginalised people facing climate or environmental challenges whose lives will be positively affected by capacity building and advocacy on sustainable development.
Explanation: This indicator will provide a figure on the broad number of people that the intervention will reach/affect. The number provided will be an estimate.
Expected target: The target number will be derived from the application. If not given here, please provide an estimate or write N/A.
Actual result: At the end of the intervention, an estimate will be given of how many people were actually reached.
Outcome 2: The number of people who have been involved in networks/organisations.
Explanation: This indicator is looking for the total number of people who have been involved implementing or carrying out the intervention in the participating organisations and networks.
Expected target: The target number will be derived from the application. If not given here, please provide an estimate. Actual result: Provide an estimate of how many people have actually been involved in organisations and networks at the end of the intervention.
Outcome 3: The number of initiatives/attempts to influence made by civil society in developing countries to sub-national and/or national authorities plus regional and international gatherings in order to influence a progressive agenda vis-a-vis international processes on climate and environment.
Explanation: Each intervention will define what should be considered an initiative or attempt. This will be defined within the context of the intervention. An initiative or attempt could be, but not limited to, include the following: Attendance at relevant conferences, meetings, fora or gatherings; meetings with relevant authorities/people; relevant workshops held or attended, campaigns, policy briefs or media exposure.
Expected target: The target numbers will be derived from the application. If not given here, please provide an estimate or write N/A.
Actual result: At the end of the intervention, an estimate will be given of how many initiatives/attempts to influence were actually made.
How to fill out the output indicator matrix:
1. Fill out the columns with the years where the intervention has been running. The numbers can be derived from the status reports given to CISU.
2. 2015 and 2016 are aggregate numbers. This means that the number given in column 2015 is a total of the number of 2014 and 2015 (for example, 2015 = 2014 + 2015). Likewise the number given in column 2016 is a total of the number of 2015 and 2016.
3. If the output indicator described is not relevant for the intervention, write N/A.
Output indicators
Organisation:Journal no.: / Expected Target / Baseline / 2014 / 2015 / 2016
1. / The number of organisations and/or networks/alliances participating in the intervention.
2. / The increase in membership of the organisations and/or networks/alliances participating in the intervention.
3. / The number of workshops/training sessions conducted aiming at building capacity on climate and environment in developing countries. / 0
4. / Number of reports from CSO meeting with policymakers and negotiators or other types of outreach (media coverage, campaigns, etc.) / 0
5. / The number of advocacy strategies/campaign plans/policy briefs drawn up in developing countries. / 0
Explanatory notes:
Output 1
The number of organisations and/or networks/alliances participating in the intervention.
Explanation: It is not an objective of the Fund to support an increase of participating organisations and networks/alliances, so we will not necessarily expect to see an increase (or decrease) in organisations, networks or alliances participating in the intervention.
Baseline: Number of organisational/network partners in the intervention as stated in the application.
Yearly result: You can state whether there has been an increase in the number of participating organisations, networks or alliances during the implementation of the intervention. This can be relevant if there is a particular objective in specific interventions for such an increase.
Expected target: If an increase in involvement of organisations is part of the intervention, the target is mentioned here.
Output 2
The increase in membership of the organisations and/or networks/alliances participating in the intervention.
Explanation: It is not an objective of the Fund to support an increase in membership of participating organisations, networks or alliances, so we will not necessarily expect to see an increase in membership unless there is a particular objective in specific interventions for such an increase.
Baseline: At start of project: how many members does each project partner have (disaggregated by individual and organisational/institutional members).
Yearly result: Yearly status of membership.
Expected target: If an increase in membership is part of the intervention, the target is mentioned here.
Output 3
The number of workshops/training sessions conducted aiming at building capacity on climate and environment in developing countries.
Explanation: We want to know how many workshops and/or training sessions are being conducted, supported by the Fund.
Baseline: 0
Yearly result: Number of workshops/training sessions held during the report period.
Expected target: If workshops/training sessions are part of the intervention, the target may be defined in the application.
Output 4
Number of reports from CSO meeting with policymakers and negotiators or other types of outreach (media coverage, campaigns, etc.)
Explanation: The number of reports, campaigns, media coverage etc. there have been during the intervention.
Baseline: 0
Yearly result: Number of reports, campaigns, media coverage etc. during the report period.
Expected target: If these elements are part of the intervention, the target may be defined in the application.
Output 5
The number of advocacy strategies/campaign plans/policy briefs drawn up in developing countries.
Explanation: The number of strategies, campaign plans and policy briefs being developed as part of the intervention.
Baseline: 0
Yearly result: Number of strategies, campaign plans and policy briefs developed during the report period.
Expected target: If these elements are part of the intervention, the target may be defined in the application.
6
Rev. June 2016