Page 1 of 4
Title / Grade bovine drop splits for leather processing
Level / 3 / Credits / 10
Purpose / People credited with this unit standard are able to: interpret company processing requirements; grade bovine drop splits; describe the effects of incorrect drop split grading; describe processing stages preceding and following leather drop split grading; demonstrate team-work; and comply with company and statutory health, safety, and environment requirements.
Classification / Leather Manufacturing > Bovine Leather Manufacture
Available grade / Achieved
Entry information
Recommended skills and knowledge / Unit 8221, Segment and trim split bovine leather, or demonstrate equivalent knowledge and skills.
Explanatory notes
1Legislation relevant to this unit standard includes but is not limited to – Health and Safety in Employment Act 1992 and the Resource Management Act 1991.
2Definitions
Company specifications are criteria set by the company related to materials, processes and practices.
Company requirements refer to instructions to staff on policy, procedures and practices related to activities in the workplace.
Outcomes and evidence requirements
Outcome 1
Interpret company processing requirements.
Evidence requirements
1.1Processing details are interpreted from company production information.
Rangedetails include but are not limited to – batch identification, substance and quality, leather type, number of hides, processing instructions, comments, and special requirements.
1.2Production planning priorities are identified in terms of company and customer requirements.
1.3Departures from company specifications are checked and authorised in accordance with company requirements.
1.4The completion of lead-in production processes is checked against production information and confirmed before processing commences.
Outcome 2
Grade bovine drop splits.
Evidence requirements
2.1Drop splits are inspected and graded in accordance with company specifications and customer requirements.
2.2Graded drop splits are segmented and trimmed to give maximum yield for the leather type in accordance with company tolerance specifications.
2.3Consistency of grading between drop splits and batches are checked to ensure it meets company specifications.
2.4Graded units are counted, identified, and recorded in accordance with company requirements and specifications.
2.5Problems affecting the supply of a constant high light environment during grading operations are reported in accordance with company specifications.
2.6Graded, drop splits are presented, stacked, and transferred to the next stage of processing in accordance with company specifications.
2.7Process control checks and documentation are completed in accordance with company specifications.
Outcome 3
Describe the effects of incorrect drop split grading.
Evidence requirements
3.1The effects of incorrect drop split grading are described in terms of cost to a tannery.
Rangeeffects include but are not limited to – damage, requirements for rework, customer dissatisfaction, financial loss.
Outcome 4
Describe processing stages preceding and following leather drop split grading.
Rangedescriptions include but are not limited to – key processing steps, production outcomes, quality outcomes, effects of non-conformance.
Evidence requirements
4.1Production requirements of the preceding processing stages are described in accordance with company specifications.
4.2Production requirements of the following processing stages are described in accordance with company specifications.
Outcome 5
Demonstrate team-work.
Evidence requirements
5.1The quality and completeness of tasks meet the operational requirements of downstream co-workers.
5.2Communication and feedback are provided to and requested from co-workers to maintain and improve task and product quality.
5.3Co-workers are not endangered through the operator's methods and equipment.
5.4Assistance is provided to co-workers within the confines of product flow and operator availability.
5.5Machinery, equipment, and facility malfunctions, and product non-conformance problems are identified and reported in accordance with company requirements.
5.6Conflict resolution techniques are applied to minimise interpersonal differences with co-workers that may adversely affect team performance.
Outcome 6
Comply with company and statutory health, safety, and environment requirements.
Evidence requirements
6.1Company-supplied clothing, and hygiene and safety equipment and materials, are worn and used in accordance with company and statutory requirements.
6.2Work methods comply with company and statutory requirements to minimise the risk of ill-health and injuries to the operator and others.
6.3Unsafe and unhealthy conditions are identified and reported in accordance with company and statutory requirements.
6.4Cleanliness of equipment, operator, and work area complies with company specifications.
6.5Waste disposal meets company safety and environmental requirements.
This unit standard is expiring. Assessment against the standard must take place by the last date for assessment set out below.
Status information and last date for assessment for superseded versions
Process / Version / Date / Last Date for AssessmentRegistration / 1 / 28 August 1996 / 31 December 2015
Revision / 2 / 23 March 1999 / 31 December 2015
Revision / 3 / 20 February 2002 / 31 December 2015
Revision / 4 / 16 January 2003 / 31 December 2015
Revision / 5 / 14 October 2004 / 31 December 2015
Review / 6 / 14 December 2007 / 31 December 2015
Review / 7 / 21 February 2013 / 31 December 2015
Rollover / 8 / 20 March 2015 / 31 December 2017
Rollover / 9 / 17 September 2015 / 31 December 2018
Consent and Moderation Requirements (CMR) reference / 0185
This CMR can be accessed at
Please note
Providers must be granted consent to assess against standards (accredited) by NZQA, before they can report credits from assessment against unit standards or deliver courses of study leading to that assessment.
Industry Training Organisations must be granted consent to assess against standards by NZQA before they can register credits from assessment against unit standards.
Providers and Industry Training Organisations, which have been granted consent and which are assessing against unit standards must engage with the moderation system that applies to those standards.
Requirements for consent to assess and an outline of the moderation system that applies to this standard are outlined in the Consent and Moderation Requirements (CMR). The CMR also includes useful information about special requirements for organisations wishing to develop education and training programmes, such as minimum qualifications for tutors and assessors, and special resource requirements.
Primary Industry Training OrganisationSSB Code101558 / New Zealand Qualifications Authority 2018 / / New Zealand Qualifications Aut