Top of Form

Post Award Large Contract GSA/FSS Order (>$100K) Review Form
Activity/Site: FISC Norfolk Detachment Phila FY:2007 QTR:04
Reviewer Name: / Last Name, First Name / Negotiator ID: / r60fml01
Reviewer Phone Nbr: / 215-697-XXXX
PIIN Number: / N00189-07-F-ZXXX / Award Amount: / $XXX,XXX.xx
* See Special Interest (SI) item definitions in the NAVSUP Enterprise QA Guide. The last letter of the SI metric code matches the labeling system used in the SI definitions in the guide.
·  This form can be saved while work is in progress by selecting the 'Save' link at the top of this page
·  Metric Types can be identified as follows: Overall Metrics are Yellow, Metric Subquestions are White, and Special Interest Metrics are Grey
·  To Complete Review, all main Large Contract and Special Interest Metrics must be addressed (subquestions do not require an entry)
·  In some instances, a Metric (LC or Special Interest) may not apply to the PIIN. It is strongly recommended that these questions are answered with 'N/A'. and not left blank.
·  Negative Responses require an entry in the 'Comments' block
·  Can't Complete this form? Go directly to the Can't Do section
Select one of the following: / Supply Service
/ LC-1 Pre-Award/Planning Initiatives /
PURCHASE REQUESTS (PR)/REQUEST FOR CONTRACTUAL PROCUREMENT (RCP)
LC-1A / Was the PR or RCP approved IAW internal instruction/policy (i.e. COMFISCINST 7112.1 (Series))? / Yes / No / N/A
Comments

SI-A / Was an Economy Act D&F prepared in accordance with NAVSUPINST 4200.90 (Series) and FAR 17.503?* / Yes / No / N/A
Comments

SI-D1 / Was Government Furnished Property (GFP) Identified and Documented IAW FAR, DFARS, NMCARS Part 45?* / Yes / No / N/A
Comments

LC-1B / Was a NMCI Waiver Form submitted (for IT over $25K) IAW NAVSUP letter 210/5088 dated 24 Mar 05? / Yes / No / N/A
Comments

SI-B / For equipment, was a Lease vs. Purchase Analysis completed IAW FAR 7.401?* / Yes / No / N/A
Comments

PRESOLICITATION
LC-1C / Was acquisition planning documentation (i.e. Pre-Solicitation Strategy) completed IAW FAR 7.1, DFARS 207.1, NMCARS 5207 and NAVSUPINST 4200.83 (Series)? / Yes / No / N/A
Comments

LC-1D / Was documentation prepared for Items Requiring Special Approvals IAW the "Don't Buy List" (NAVSUPINST 4200.85 (Series))? / Yes / No / N/A
Comments

LC-1E / Was Technical Screening for Priorities for Use of Government Supply Sources completed IAW FAR 8.002? / Yes / No / N/A
Comments

LC-1F / Was the market research thoroughly documented IAW FAR and DFARS Part 10? / Yes / No / N/A
Comments

LC-1G / If contract requirements were combined exceeding $5M, was the appropriate consolidation determination made IAW DFARS 207.170-3 and NMCARS 5207.170-3 as delineated in NAVSUP Policy Letter 05-09? / Yes / No / N/A
Comments

LC-1H / Was the file properly documented to procure supplies or services through a Non-DoD contract IAW NAVSUP Policy Letter 07-29? / Yes / No / N/A
Comments

SI-H1 / For service procurements over $100K, was the MOPAS Acquisition Strategy prepared IAW NAVSUP Policy Letter 07-08?* / Yes / No / N/A
Comments

LC-1I / Was a waiver from using Seaport-e prepared IAW NAVSUP Policy Letter 05-17? (SERVICES PERFORMED OVERSEAS ARE EXEMPT) / Yes / No / N/A
Comments

SI-H2 / If the services are not performance based (FAR 37.6), was a waiver approved IAW DFARS 237.170-2 and NMCARS 5237.170-2 as delineated in NAVSUP Policy Letter 07-29?* / Yes / No / N/A
Comments

LC-1J / Were considerations made to solicit based on socio-economic status IAW FAR 8.405-5? / Yes / No / N/A
Comments

OVERALL METRIC RATING
LC-1 Pre-Award/Planning Initiatives / Yes / No / N/A
Comments are mandatory if response to question is 'No'

/ LC-2 Adequate Competition /
LC-2A / Was the Limited Sources Justification and Approval formatted, signed and approved IAW FAR 8.405-6? / Yes / No / N/A
Comments

LC-2B / Did the rationale adequately support the exception to competition? / Yes / No / N/A
Comments

OVERALL METRIC RATING
LC-2 Adequate Competition / Yes / No / N/A
Comments are mandatory if response to question is 'No'

/ LC-6 Complete Audit Trail /
CONTRACT AWARD
SI-D2 / Was Responsibility/Liability for GFP clearly defined IAW FAR 45.103?* / Yes / No / N/A
Comments

LC-6A / Did the Office of Counsel review the award document IAW internal policy? / Yes / No / N/A
Comments

LC-6B / Was the award made in the appropriate procurement system? (i.e. SPS, ITIMP, etc.) / Yes / No / N/A
Comments

POST AWARD ACTIONS
LC-6C / Was the DD Form 350/Contract Action Report (CAR) completed timely and signed IAW PGI 204.670-3? / Yes / No / N/A
Comments

LC-6D / Was the DD Form 350/CAR coded correctly? / Yes / No / N/A
Comments

LC-6E / If applicable, was the DD Form 350/CAR accurately coded to reflect use of the FAR 13.5 Test Program? / Yes / No / N/A
Comments

LC-6F / Was the award properly synopsized IAW FAR 5.301, DFARS 205.3 and NMCARS 5205.3? / Yes / No / N/A
Comments

LC-6G / Was the contract file adequately maintained IAW FAR 4.8 and DFARS 204.8? / Yes / No / N/A
Comments

LC-6H / Was a Contracting Officer's Representative (COR) properly delegated and appointed IAW NAVSUPINST 4205.3 (Series) and NAVSUP Policy Letter 06-26? / Yes / No / N/A
Comments

LC-6I / For contracts with a COR, was clause DFARS 252.201-7000 incorporated into the contract? / Yes / No / N/A
Comments

LC-6J / For contracts with a COR, was an adequate Contract Administration Plan (CAP) implemented IAW NAVSUPINST 4205.3 (Series)? / Yes / No / N/A
Comments

LC-6K / Was a contract award announcement released to the Navy Chief of Information (CHINFO) IAW DFARS 205.303 and NAVSUPINST 4200.84 (Series)? (CONTRACTS EXCEEDING $5.5M) / Yes / No / N/A
Comments

LC-6L / Was the subcontracting plan incorporated into the contract in accordance with FAR Part 19? / Yes / No / N/A
Comments

LC-6M / Was the award posted to the Electronic Document Access (EDA) in accordance with NMCARS 5204.201? / Yes / No / N/A
Comments

OVERALL METRIC RATING
LC-6 Complete Audit Trail / Yes / No / N/A
Comments are mandatory if response to question is 'No'

/ LC-7 Proper use of GSA Multiple Award Schedules /
LC-7A / Were the clauses appropriate for type of order identified? / Yes / No / N/A
Comments

SI-F / Were Clauses for Domestic and Foreign Restriction including the Buy American Act identified?* / Yes / No / N/A
Comments

LC-7B / Were at least three schedule contractors reviewed for the required supplies/services IAW FAR 8.405-1(c)(1)? / Yes / No / N/A
Comments

LC-7C / Was the pricing decision properly documented? / Yes / No / N/A
Comments

LC-7D / Did the award decision clearly identify evaluation of all factors and a trade-off analysis? / Yes / No / N/A
Comments

LC-7E / Did the documentation adequately address price reductions IAW FAR 8.405-4? / Yes / No / N/A
Comments

LC-7F / Was the order awarded as the best value and Lowest Overall Cost Alternative (LOCA) IAW FAR 8.404(d)? / Yes / No / N/A
Comments

LC-7G / For task orders with a SOW that are not FFP or performance based, was adequate rationale provided IAW FAR 8.405-2(e)(7)? / Yes / No / N/A
Comments

LC-7H / Was the BCM/PNM properly approved by the Contracting Officer or the CRB IAW NAVSUPINST 4200.83 (Series) and local instructions? / Yes / No / N/A
Comments

OVERALL METRIC RATING
LC-7 Proper use of GSA Multiple Award Schedules / Yes / No / N/A
Comments are mandatory if response to question is 'No'

Additional Comments

Maximum 1000 characters allowed
If this Review can not be completed, select reason from dropdown list and then select the 'Can't Do' button
Reason is mandatory if job can not be reviewed
/

Bottom of Form