Feb 14-18, 2005 FEMA Emergency Management Higher Education Project Activity Report
(1) CASE STUDIES IN CRISIS AND EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT -- TEXTBOOK DEVELOPMENT PROJECT:
February 14, 2005 -- Received for review from lead textbook developer, George Haddow of Haddow and Bullock, LTD., Chapter 3, Mitigation.
(2) COASTAL HAZARDS MANAGEMENT -- GRADUATE-LEVEL COURSE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT:
February 14, 2005 -- Reviewed and approved 2nd draft of Session 11, "The Human Coast," by Katherine Eschelbackh, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
February 15, 2005 -- Reviewed and approved 2nd draft of Session 21, "Competing Values in Coastal Hazards Management," by Dr. Tim Beatley, University of Virginia.
February 16, 2005 -- Reviewed and approved 2nd draft of Session 22-23, "Growth Management," by Katherine Eschelbach.
February 17, 2005 -- Reviewed and approved 2nd draft of Session 29, "Federal Policy II: Coastal Zone Management Act; Coastal Barrier Resources Act," by lead course developer, Professor David Brower, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Reviewed and approved 2nd draft of Session 37, "Hazard Mitigation Planning I, by Anna K. Schwab, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
Forwarded all sessions to EMI Webmaster to upload to the Project web-site -- Free College Courses section -- Courses Under Development subsection -- where they should be accessible shortly.
(3) COMMUNITY COLLEGE DISASTER PREPAREDNESS SUMMIT, MARCH 6, 2005, NEW YORK CITY:
February 16, 2005 -- Received following announcement:
"The Community College National Center for Community Engagement http://www.mc.maricopa.edu/other/engagement/ and the League for Innovation in the Community College are hosting the Disaster Preparedness Summit to help community colleges create and improve disaster preparedness training and education programs that emphasize community engagement. The 2005 summit offers research and theories, strategies, and tips and techniques for connecting disaster preparedness academic curriculum to civic engagement. Participants from all disciplines are encouraged to attend. Examples of how community colleges can address issues of disaster preparedness, service learning, and civic engagement include
* Business & pol sci professors addressing economic impacts of natural disasters...
* History, civics or government professors on...democracy and deliberation;
* Geography professors addressing cultural awareness and civic engagement;
* Counseling or psychology professors addressing critical incident stress management;
* Allied health professors addressing global infectious diseases and public awareness;
* Communication professors addressing identity theft and safety precautions;
* Computer information systems professors partnering with community-based organizations to address cybersecurity;
* Biology or chemistry professors addressing bioterrorism;
* Student services volunteer programs addressing home safety; and
* EMT or fire science professors addressing first-responder programming...
* Veterinarian Technician professors addressing pet evacuation in times of disasters.
The Disaster Preparedness Summit will be held on Sunday, March 6, 2005, from 9:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. at the Marriott Marquis, New York (Time Square). Registration scholarships in the amount of $150 per participant are generously being sponsored by the Community College National Center for Community Engagement. Space is limited to 75 participants, so register early!"
Wendy Neil, Director, Membership Services, 4505 E. Chandler Blvd., Ste 250, Phoenix, AZ 85048, 480-705-8200 x 234, 480-705-8201,
(4) DISASTER RESPONSE OPERATIONS AND MANAGEMENT -- UPPERDIVISIONCOLLEGE COURSE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT:
February 16, 2005 -- Received from course developer, Dr. David McEntire, University of NorthTexas, 2nd draft of Session 19, "Volunteer Management" -- which was reviewed, approved and forwarded to the EMI Webmaster for upload to the Project web-site -- Free College Courses section -- Courses Under Development subsection -- where it should be accessible shortly.
February 17, 2005 -- Received for review from Dr. McEntire, 1st draft of Session 25, "Responding to Natural Disasters."
(5) DISCIPLINES, DISASTERS AND EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT -- TEXTBOOK DEVELOPMENT PROJECT:
February 18, 2005 -- Reviewed and approved 2nd draft chapter on "Business Crisis and Continuity Management," by Dr. Greg Shaw, Senior Research Scientist, Institute for Crisis, Disaster, and Risk Management," and forwarded to EMI Webmaster for upload to the Project website -- Free College Courses and Textbooks section -- to replace the 1st draft -- where it should be accessible soon.
(6) EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT HIGHER EDUCATION CONFERENCE, JUNE 7-9, 2005, EMMITSBURG, MD:
February 14, 2005 -- Communicated with Dr. Anthony Brown, Professor and Coordinator, Fire & Emergency Management Program, Department of Political Science, Oklahoma State University, Norman, concerning his presenting a report on a survey he is finishing that concerns demographic and attitudinal information from a survey of emergency managers in the largest 150 US cities -- during a panel devoted to committee and survey report-outs. Dr. Brown notes that he has received responses from 69 of these emergency managers (a 46% response rate).
February 14, 2005 -- Communicated with Dr. Ron Casey, Southern Nevada Community College, concerning his participation on the "State, Regional, National Emergency Management Initiatives" panel -- discussing how he is developing an emergency management program at SNCC that will be available statewide in Nevada.
February 14-15, 2005 -- Communicated with Dr. Dennis Mileti, former Director of the NaturalHazardsCenter at the University of Colorado at Boulder, concerning several different topic areas he could address while attending the conference.
February 14-15, 2005 -- Communicated with Daria Valkenburg, Education Officer, CanadianEmergencyPreparednessCollege, Ottawa, Canada, concerning review comments on the working draft conference topics document and about his participation at the conference.
February 16, 2005 -- The Project Assistant forwarded to the EMI Webmaster for upload to the Project web-site -- Conference Box at the top of the home-page, a conference announcement letter, application form (Form 75-5), draft Conference Topics document, info sheet for foreign applicants, and local motel/hotel information -- which should be accessible shortly.
February 17, 2005 -- Communicated with David Kaufman with the DHS Office of Domestic Preparedness concerning ODP representation and participation during the conference -- such as on ODP Update presentation.
February 17-18, 2005 -- Communicated with Dr. Havidan Rodriguez, Director of the DisasterResearchCenter at the University of Delaware concerning his presentation during the Disaster Research and Practitioners session and about his providing comments relating to his recent activity concerning the Indian Ocean Tsunami Response and Relief operations.
February 18, 2005 -- Communicated with Dr. Hank Fischer, Millersville University of Pennsylvania, about his presenting one or more of the "mini-lectures" (5-10 minutes) he is doing for the EM HiEd Project, at the Conference. Our intent is to place these on the Project website where they can be streamed. If all goes well and according to plan, we hope to do more of these with other disaster/emergency management faculty in the future on a variety of topics -- contingent, of course, on getting developmental funding reinstated for the EM HiEd Project.
(7) EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT IN THE 21ST CENTURY SLIDE PRESENTATION BY KAY GOSS:
February 15, 2005 -- Received a 21-page Power Point slide presentation entitled "Emergency Management in the 21st Century: Living in the New Normal," by Kay C. Goss, CEM, Senior Advisor for Homeland Security, Emergency Management, and Business Continuity, for Electronic Data Systems Corporation (EDS), and forwarded to the EMI Webmaster for upload to the Project web-site -- Articles, Papers, Presentations section -- after receiving permission.
(8) FLOODPLAIN MANAGEMENT -- GRADUATE-LEVEL COURSE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT:
February 14, 2005 -- Reviewed 2nd draft of Session 1, "Course Introduction," by lead course developer, Bob Freitag, University of Washington, provided review comments
February 15, 2005 -- Reviewed and approved 3rd draft of Session 2, "River Systems and Tectonics," by Dr. Donald Reichmuth.
February 16, 2005 -- Reviewed and approved 2nd draft of Session 3, "Glaciation & Erosion Processes -- The Production of Sediment," by Dr. Reichmuth.
February 17, 2005 -- Reviewed and approved 2nd draft of Session 4, "Meteorological Processes - The Production of Water on Land," by Dr. Reichmuth.
February 18, 2005 -- Reviewed and approved 2nd draft of Session 5, "Land Use & Cover -- The History of Resource Utilization," and reviewed and commented upon 1st draft of Session 6, "Stream Mechanics Framework - Evolution and Flow and Analysis," both by Dr. Reichmuth. From the scope statement for Session 6:
"Floodplain management requires knowledge of where we have been, before reasonable and sustainable decisions can be made on how we should proceed in correcting past errors and minimizing future conflicts that impact our irreplaceable riparian areas. This session traces drainage evolution since the last ice age and provides the physical basis for determining how stream characteristics are modified when flow, energy, and sediment inputs change. Stream flow will be analyzed from three levels (flow downhill, secondary current flow, and random eddy flow) to explain the physical channel patterns that exist."
Forwarded sessions to the EMI Webmaster to upload to the Project website -- Free College Courses section -- Courses Under Development subsection (to replace earlier drafts) -- where they should be accessible shortly.
(9) NEW JERSEY SURVEY OF PRIVATE SECTOR BUSINESS CONTINUITY:
February 14, 2005 -- Came upon February 10 Press Release from the New Jersey Department of Commerce, Economic Growth & Tourism Commission, noting the release of a "Small Business Continuity Task Force Report" -- "an effort to assist small businesses in response to unpredictable events such as a terrorist attack or natural disaster. The Press Release notes that: "An estimated 25 to 40 percent of small businesses do not reopen following a disaster, and a survey last summer by NJBIZ and the New Jersey State Chamber of Commerce indicated that 48 percent of businesses have not taken steps to increase security or prepare for a future attack, while only 8 percent had a comprehensive business continuity plan. The press release noted the release that day of a "Checklist with concrete, easy to follow steps for small business owners to formulate a continuity plan best suited for their individual business." The Release noted that for additional information to call: (609) 777-0885. The press release can be accessed at: SOUTHERN CONNECTICUTSTATEUNIVERSITY -- UPDATE ON EMERGENCY MANAGEMENT PROGRAM:
February 15, 2005 -- Dr. Bernadette Madara emails to note that an Emergency Management Advisory Board has been put together to assist in the design, development and maintenance of a new Emergency Management Certificate Program. For further information, Dr. Madura can be reached at:
(11) SPONTANEOUS DISASTER VOLUNTEERS:
February 16, 2005 -- Received January/February issue of "Homeland Protection Professional" (Vol.4, No.1) and found article on spontaneous volunteers by contributing editor, David Wagman, that should be of interest to those teaching disaster preparedness and response collegiate courses -- entitled: "Well-Intentioned, Sometimes Misguided," with subtitle of "Spontaneous, or unaffiliated volunteers have big hearts, but without proper planning and guidance, they can impede, not help, disaster response and recovery efforts." This edition also contains a short interview with FEMA Director Michael Brown -- on the National Response Plan and the National Incident Management System (at p. 42).
(12) UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE, DISASTERRESEARCHCENTER -- UNDERGRADUATE DISASTER RESEARCH OPPORTUNITY:
February 16, 2005 -- Received following note from Havidan Rodriguez, DisasterResearchCenter, University of Delaware:
"The National Science Foundation (NSF) recently funded a proposal to establish a Research Experience for Undergraduates (REU) site at the DisasterResearchCenter at the University of Delaware. We will be providing hands-on research training and mentoring to 10 undergraduate students throughout the country (each year) on the social science aspects of disasters. The program will begin this summer and the application deadline is April 1. Students will be notified by April 15 regarding the outcome of their application. Program details, guidelines, and application materials can be found online. Please inform your social science undergraduate students about this important research opportunity and encourage them to apply! We are looking forward to receiving applications from your students. Please let me know if you have any questions. The URL's are: http://www.udel.edu/DRC/; "click" on: REU Summer Research Program, or go directly to: http://muweb.millersville.edu/%7ECDRE/DRC/
Havidán Rodríguez, Ph.D., Director, Disaster Research Center, University of Delaware, 87 East Main Street, Newark, DE 19716-2581, Phone: (302) 831-6618, Fax: (302) 831-2091, Email:
(13) WEEKEND READING -- THE BIG ONE: THE EARTHQUAKE THAT ROCKED EARLY AMERICA AND HELPED CREATE A SCIENCE:
February 14, 2005 -- Read this book over the weekend -- by Jake page and Charles Officer (Boston & New York: Houghton Mifflin Col, 2004) -- includes some interesting material from eye-witness accounts of the New Madrid quakes of 1811-1812, but most of the material deals with earthquakes in general and the evolution of earthquake science. The book is written for a general audience. There were three major quakes -- December 16, 1811, January 23, 1812, and February 7, 1812 -- "Smaller shocks occurred throughout, and continued on at a rate of better than one a day for months." (p. 14). Some notes.
The "river town of Big Prairie [MO]...built on sandy sediments, sank without a trace as the ground below it was saturated with water. The land was in motion, undulating, like an ocean." (p. 4)
"In Charleston, South Carolina, the bells of St. Philip's Church rang. The parade grounds in Georgetown, South Carolina, sank two inches." (p. 5)
On the first, December 16th quake: "As reports arrived in the offices of newspapers over the next days and weeks, it became clear that the area over which shocks were felt was unprecedented: a million square miles. Significant damage occurred in an area about the size of Texas and minor damage over a region twice that size. (By comparison, damage caused by the storied San Francisco earthquake of 1906 occurred over an area smaller than that of Delaware." (p. 6)
"How many people were killed in the shocks of December has been estimated since at a maximum of fifteen hundred, with most of those being Indians, but no one will ever know the exact number of lives." (p. 7)
From an eyewitness who was just south of New Madrid on December 16: "'...tremendous and uninterrupted explosions, resembling a discharge of artillery....Wherever the veins of the earthquake ran, there was a volcanic discharge of combustible matter to a great height, as incessant rumbling was heard below.' The great spouts of water were especially alarming: 'Large trees, which had lain for ages at the bottom of the river, were shot up in the thousands of instances, some with their roots uppermost and their tops planted; others were hurled into the air.'" (pp. 12-13)
"...the December 16 quake has been calculated to be 8.2; the January 23 quake 8.1; and the February 7 quake, the largest of all, 8.3. By way of comparison, the San Francisco quake of 1906 was 7.6." (p. 16)
Referring to the third quake of February 6: "Only minutes after the hard shock struck in New Madrid, church bells rang in Pennsylvania and south to South Carolina. Windows rattled for two minutes in Montreal, more than a thousand miles to the north and east. A newsman in Cape Girardeau, a bit north of New Madrid, said the shock lasted almost fifteen minutes..." (p. 18)
"While no one can pinpoint with any great precision the actual epicenter of any of the three large quakes, the third quake's epicenter had clearly moved north and east and was only miles away from New Madrid" [which was destroyed by the combination of quakes and "is now a sandbar in the river and woodland in a tiny fragment of the state of Kentucky..."]. (p. 19)
"...over a region of some five thousand square miles...Swamplands and lakes were raised until they became dry land. Streams became instead strings of ponds. The quakes threw up dams that caused rivers to become lakes; large areas of land sank, creating ponds and lakes where none had been before." (p. 22)
"A repeat sequence of the New Madrid quakes, the Federal Emergency Management Agency asserted, 'would result in damages, disruptions, casualties and injuries on a scale never experienced from a natural hazard in the history of this nation.' According to the National Academy of Engineering, whose Committee on Earthquake Engineering in 1992 estimated the building damage losses from a repeat of only the first of the three New Madrid quakes, the December 16 quake that achieved a magnitude of 8.2, twenty-four of the lower forth-eight states would suffer. Hardest hit, of course, would be Arkansas, Kentucky, Missouri, and Tennessee, with considerable damage to Illinois, Indiana, Mississippi, and Ohio....The engineering study of 1992 came up with a total loss as a result of commercial and residential building damage from one quake of Magnitude 8.2 of about $140 billion. This included damage from both ground motion and subsequent fires. The estimate did not include other forms of direct economic losses that would occur." (pp. 209-210)
"Consider (as FEMA has) what might be the fate of the largest city in the region -- St. Louis...some 80 percent of the city's buildings -- both residential and nonresidential -- are made of unreinforced masonry, which is particularly vulnerable to earthquake damage. If the quake struck on a weekend or at night, most people would be at home, and in the suburbs at least, most residences are predominantly wood-frame and less subject to the kind of damage that causes death and serious injury. Overall, casualties from a weekday quake might reach about forty-five hundred, while a weekend or nighttime quake would produce about four thousand, according to a 1990 estimate by the Federal Emergency Management Agency....Similar scenarios would almost surely be played out in other great cities of the region -- Memphis, Louisville, and Cincinnati, to name three..." (pp. 211-212)
"In 1811 and 1812, the three great quakes caused gigantic waves in the Mississippi, waterfalls, and even retrograde motion of the waters [flowing backwards]. Whole sections of riverbanks collapsed into the river, causing mini-tsunamis. Today, from the river town of Cairo, Illinois, south to Baton Rouge, Louisiana, the levees that hold the great river to its present course would be breached here and there, and the region would be severely flooded....Overall, such a quake would have enormous industrial, agricultural, ecological, and human ramifications. Fatalities could reach about 1 percent of the twenty-two million people who live in the area of most severe damage -- roughly some two hundred thousand individuals" (p. 212)
"What would this all cost? We have concluded that $1 trillion is not an unreasonable cost estimate....Will it happen? Yes, in all likelihood, given what we now know about stable-crust earthquakes." (p. 213)
Sources mentioned above: