Javascript Must Be Enabled on Your Web Browser

Javascript must be enabled on your web browser.
Fields marked with * are mandatory.

Top of Form

INSPIRE Annex II+III Data Specification Testing Report

*Testing coordinator /
Testing Contact Point
*Name /
*Surname (Family name) /
*e-mail /
*Tel. /
Fax /
*What kind of test would you like to report? / Feasibility Testing
Fitness for purpose testing
How many other organanisations participated in the testing?
You will be asked to provide the name and role of each organisaion /

*Name of organisation 1
By typing the first letters of the organisation name you will be prompted with the names of organisations already registered in the INSPIRE SDIC/LMO database. However you can also also enter the name of an organisation not registered in the INSPIRE database / State Nature Conservancy of the Slovak Republic
*Role of organisation 1 in the testing
Please select any that apply / DATA PROVIDER
INFRASTRUCTURE PROVIDER
DATA MAPPER
DATA TRANSFORMER
OTHER
If you selected "OTHER" please specify

Bottom of Form

Top of Form

Feasibility Testing Step 1/4

Feasibility Testing Description
*Methodology used in the testing
Short description of the methodology/process used in the testing /
*Description of software and tools used in the testing
Short description of software and tools used in the testing /
*How many source/input datasets did you use in the testing.
For each dataset you will be asked to provide the following information:
Dataset name, description, URL and URL for metadata and data /

Bottom of Form

Top of Form

Feasibility Testing Step 2/4

Source dataset description (Dataset 1)
You have already entered this dataset.
*Dataset Name
Title of the dataset (including the name of the dataset)
Example:
Biogeographical regions (biogeograficke_regiony) /
*Dataset description
Short description of the input dataset used in the testing
Example:
Biogeographical regions of Slovakia /
URL for Metadata
If possible provide a URL of the metadata for the input dataset
Example:
/
URL for Dataset
If the metadata does not contain a direct link to the dataset, please provide the dataset URL here
Example:
/
Source dataset description (Dataset 2)
You have already entered this dataset.
*Dataset Name
Title of the dataset (including the name of the dataset)
Example:
Biogeographical regions (biogeograficke_regiony) /
*Dataset description
Short description of the input dataset used in the testing
Example:
Biogeographical regions of Slovakia /
URL for Metadata
If possible provide a URL of the metadata for the input dataset
Example:
/
URL for Dataset
If the metadata does not contain a direct link to the dataset, please provide the dataset URL here
Example:
/
Source dataset description (Dataset 3)
You have already entered this dataset.
*Dataset Name
Title of the dataset (including the name of the dataset)
Example:
Biogeographical regions (biogeograficke_regiony) /
*Dataset description
Short description of the input dataset used in the testing
Example:
Biogeographical regions of Slovakia /
URL for Metadata
If possible provide a URL of the metadata for the input dataset
Example:
/
URL for Dataset
If the metadata does not contain a direct link to the dataset, please provide the dataset URL here
Example:
/

Bottom of Form

Top of Form

Feasibility Testing Step 3/4

*Which INSPIRE Themes did you test?
Please select the theme(s) tested.
Annex I themes are also listed so that you can report testing results related to inter-connections between Annex I and Annex II+III themes.
On the next page you will be able to associate your input datasets to the selected themes / ANNEX 2

Elevation

Land cover

Orthoimagery

Geology
ANNEX 3

Statistical units

Buildings

Soil

Land use

Human health and safety

Utility and governmental services

Environmental monitoring Facilities

Production and industrial facilities

Agricultural and aquaculture facilities

Population distribution and demography

Area management/restriction/regulation zones & reporting units

Natural risk zones

Atmospheric conditions

Meteorological geographical features

Oceanographic geographical features

Sea regions

Bio-geographical regions

Habitats and biotopes

Species distribution

Energy Resources

Mineral Resources
ANNEX 1

Coordinate reference systems

Geographical grid systems

Geographical names

Administrative units

Addresses

Cadastral parcels

Transport networks

Hydrography

Protected sites

Bottom of Form

Top of Form

Feasibility Testing Step 4/4

Bio-geographical regions
*Which datasets did you use to test this theme ? /
Bio-geographical regions (Bio-geographical_regions.shp)

Habitats and biotopes (Habitats_and_biotopes.shp)

Species distribution (Species_distribution.shp)
*Select the application schema(s) used for testing /
Bio-geographicalRegions
*Feasibility of the transformation
Fully feasible
(It was possible to transform all relevant spatial objects in the input data sets (and their attributes/relationships) into a corresponding structure of the proposed INSPIRE schemas, and all transformed objects are compliant with the requirements of the proposed INSPIRE schemas (e.g. multiplicity, voidability of attributes).
Partly feasible
(Some of the relevant spatial objects in the input data sets (and/or their attributes/relationships) could not be transformed into a corresponding structure of the proposed INSPIRE schema and/or some of the transformed objects are not fully compliant with the requirements of the proposed INSPIRE schemas (e.g. multiplicity, voidability of attributes)).
Not feasible
(None or hardly any of the relevant spatial objects in the input data sets (and/or their attributes/relationships) could not be transformed into a corresponding structure of the proposed INSPIRE schemas.)
If you selected 'partly feasible' or 'not feasible', please describe the issues and provide suggestions for improvements of the tested data specifications via Testing XLS spreadsheet for comments , which you can submit on the end of this webform
*What are the feasibility testing outcomes? / Filled Matching Tables
Transformed datasets/services
Other
If you selected "OTHER" please specify

*How many output datasets/services were the results of the feasibility testing?
For each dataset/service you will be asked to provide following information:
Name, Description, URL for metadata and dataset

*Name
Title of the dataset/service (including the local name of the dataset/service)
Example: INSPIRE Biogeographical regions (inspire_biogeograficke_regiony)
*Description
Short description of the output dataset/service as result of feasibility testing)
Example: INSPIRE compliant Biogeographical regions of Slovakia
URL for Metadata
If possible provide a URL of the metadata for the output dataset/service
URL for Dataset
If possible and the metadata does not contain a direct link to the dataset, please provide a URL for directly accessing the output dataset
/ DATASET/SERVICE 1
Remove Source Dataset




Habitats and biotopes
*Which datasets did you use to test this theme ? /
Bio-geographical regions (Bio-geographical_regions.shp)

Habitats and biotopes (Habitats_and_biotopes.shp)

Species distribution (Species_distribution.shp)
*Select the application schema(s) used for testing /
HabitatsAndBiotopes

HabitatsAndBiotopes Implementation
*Feasibility of the transformation
Fully feasible
(It was possible to transform all relevant spatial objects in the input data sets (and their attributes/relationships) into a corresponding structure of the proposed INSPIRE schemas, and all transformed objects are compliant with the requirements of the proposed INSPIRE schemas (e.g. multiplicity, voidability of attributes).
Partly feasible
(Some of the relevant spatial objects in the input data sets (and/or their attributes/relationships) could not be transformed into a corresponding structure of the proposed INSPIRE schema and/or some of the transformed objects are not fully compliant with the requirements of the proposed INSPIRE schemas (e.g. multiplicity, voidability of attributes)).
Not feasible
(None or hardly any of the relevant spatial objects in the input data sets (and/or their attributes/relationships) could not be transformed into a corresponding structure of the proposed INSPIRE schemas.)
If you selected 'partly feasible' or 'not feasible', please describe the issues and provide suggestions for improvements of the tested data specifications via Testing XLS spreadsheet for comments , which you can submit on the end of this webform
*What are the feasibility testing outcomes? / Filled Matching Tables
Transformed datasets/services
Other
If you selected "OTHER" please specify

*How many output datasets/services were the results of the feasibility testing?
For each dataset/service you will be asked to provide following information:
Name, Description, URL for metadata and dataset

*Name
Title of the dataset/service (including the local name of the dataset/service)
Example: INSPIRE Biogeographical regions (inspire_biogeograficke_regiony)
*Description
Short description of the output dataset/service as result of feasibility testing)
Example: INSPIRE compliant Biogeographical regions of Slovakia
URL for Metadata
If possible provide a URL of the metadata for the output dataset/service
URL for Dataset
If possible and the metadata does not contain a direct link to the dataset, please provide a URL for directly accessing the output dataset
/ DATASET/SERVICE 1
Remove Source Dataset




Species distribution
*Which datasets did you use to test this theme ? /
Bio-geographical regions (Bio-geographical_regions.shp)

Habitats and biotopes (Habitats_and_biotopes.shp)

Species distribution (Species_distribution.shp)
*Select the application schema(s) used for testing /
SpeciesDistribution

SpeciesDistribution Implementation
*Feasibility of the transformation
Fully feasible
(It was possible to transform all relevant spatial objects in the input data sets (and their attributes/relationships) into a corresponding structure of the proposed INSPIRE schemas, and all transformed objects are compliant with the requirements of the proposed INSPIRE schemas (e.g. multiplicity, voidability of attributes).
Partly feasible
(Some of the relevant spatial objects in the input data sets (and/or their attributes/relationships) could not be transformed into a corresponding structure of the proposed INSPIRE schema and/or some of the transformed objects are not fully compliant with the requirements of the proposed INSPIRE schemas (e.g. multiplicity, voidability of attributes)).
Not feasible
(None or hardly any of the relevant spatial objects in the input data sets (and/or their attributes/relationships) could not be transformed into a corresponding structure of the proposed INSPIRE schemas.)
If you selected 'partly feasible' or 'not feasible', please describe the issues and provide suggestions for improvements of the tested data specifications via Testing XLS spreadsheet for comments , which you can submit on the end of this webform
*What are the feasibility testing outcomes? / Filled Matching Tables
Transformed datasets/services
Other
If you selected "OTHER" please specify

*How many output datasets/services were the results of the feasibility testing?
For each dataset/service you will be asked to provide following information:
Name, Description, URL for metadata and dataset

*Name
Title of the dataset/service (including the local name of the dataset/service)
Example: INSPIRE Biogeographical regions (inspire_biogeograficke_regiony)
*Description
Short description of the output dataset/service as result of feasibility testing)
Example: INSPIRE compliant Biogeographical regions of Slovakia
URL for Metadata
If possible provide a URL of the metadata for the output dataset/service
URL for Dataset
If possible and the metadata does not contain a direct link to the dataset, please provide a URL for directly accessing the output dataset
/ DATASET/SERVICE 1
Remove Source Dataset




Costs and Benefits related to the feasibility testing
If possible please specify the effort required for each area of the feasibility testing activities
Specify the effort in person days for the whole testing period / Training / Studying the Data Specifications (DS) /
Identifying and collecting relevat input data sets /
Creating the mapping rules (e.g. matching tables) /
Setting up the testing infrastructure /
Executing the data transformation /
Validating the testing results /
Documenting the testing results /
Management and coordination of testing /
Total / Person days
Please describe the benefits identified during the feasibility testing for your institution (partners, testing group) /

Bottom of Form

INSPIRE Annex II+III testing comments
Comments file
/ Testing results file