ETL203L Assignment 2 – Tania Sorbello s234250
Assessment Rubric
Assessment criteria / Towards the levelPossible points 1-2 / At the level
Possible points 3-4 / Beyond the level
Possible points 5-6 / Points Awarded
Understands the concept of working within a budget. / Shows little or no understanding of working within a budget and the relationship with real – life mathematics. / Understands budgeting concepts and their use in real – life mathematics. / Highly developed understanding of budgeting concepts and their use in real – life mathematics.
Understanding of the application of discounts in financial mathematics. / Shows limited understanding of the use applying discounts. Lacks the ability to relate percentage concepts to financial mathematics. / Understands use of applying discounts and is able to relate percentage concepts to financial mathematics. / Demonstrates a deep understanding of applying discounts and is able to use multiple methods to relate percentage concepts to financial mathematics.
Ability to graphically display data. / Shows limited understanding of ways in which to convert data into graphical displays. / Is able to interpret data in a manner that allows its conversion into graphical displays. / Demonstrates a deep understanding the relationship between data and the many ways it can be displayed graphically.
Ability to utilise digital resources / Shows limited understanding of digital resources such as hyperlinks and the web and the role they play in research and display methods. / Understands ways in which digital technology can be utilised to research and display information. / Demonstrates highly developed skills when using multiple methods of digital technology. Thoroughly understands how technologies relate to research and display of information.
Participates in class discussions. / Student lacks confidence in putting forward ideas and opinions. / Student adequately presents their ideas and opinions in class discussions. / Student confidently and coherently presents their ideas and opinions which are of high standard during class discussions.
Ability to work as part of a cohesive group. / Student shows little ability when working within a group. Struggles with individual roles and Is unable to provide quality contributions. / Student is able to work as a part of a cohesive group, taking on individual roles and provide adequate contributions. / Student shows highly developed ability when working as a part of a cohesive group, showing leadership when taking on individual roles and provide quality contributions.
Ability to engage in the personal and group appraisal process. / Student shows little ability in appraising their own and their group’s performance, showing limited ability in identifying strengths and weaknesses. / Student is able to adequately appraise their own and their group’s performance, identifying strengths and weaknesses. / Student demonstrates a high level of during and post-production analysis, Identifies intricate strengths and weakness in great detail.
Total / Possible Score: 42 Points / Actual score:
Overall Grading:
Overall Score 1 – 18 / Towards the required levelOverall Score 19 – 32 / At the required level
Overall Score 33 - 42 / Beyond the required level