Full ERC Name, ERC Acronym

Presenter: / First Last Name
Pitch Title
Full ERC Name, ERC Acronym
ERC Home University, Location:
Student Home University, Location:
Degree Program:
Advisor:
Date: / February 2017
Poor
(0 points) / Fair
(1-2 points) / Good
(3-5 points) / Excellent
(6-10 points) / Score
Problem Statement / Did not clearly explain the problem / Problem explained, but no connection to applications / Problem and connection to application explained / Clearly and simply described the problem and application
Proposed solution / Did not clearly explain the solution / Solution explained but not well connected to problem / Solution explained and connected to problem. / Exhibits clear expertise in how solution connects to problem
Broader Impact / Did not discuss benefits of the technology / Minimal description of benefits / Adequate description of benefits / Clear, compelling description of benefits
Mission Fit (for local competitions only) / Does not fit within ERC mission / Fit within ERC mission is tenuous or unclear / Fit within ERC mission is appropriate / Fit within ERC mission is clear and logical
Call to Action / Call to action not included / Call to action is unclear or not compelling / Call to action is clear and well articulated but only somewhat compelling / Call to action leaves you wanting to get started or yearning to learn more
Visual Anchor / Anchor negatively detracts or distracts from the message of the pitch / Anchor is a generic and not particularly memorable / Anchor complements the pitch & helps the judges remember the pitch / Anchor is visually engaging, informative, and easily facilitates the intended message
Poise/Style / Lacks confidence and enthusiasm / Mildly uncomfortable with audience / Makes eye contact and engages audience / Enthusiasm is contagious
Judge # ___ / Comments / Total Points:
Strengths
Suggestions