Search & Navigation Bibliography

Information Retrieval in Online Catalogs Bibliography

Bates, M. J. (2003). Task Force Recommendation 2.3 Research and Design Review: Improving User Access to Library Catalog and Portal Information. Library of Congress Bicentennial Conference on Bibliographic Control for the New Millenium. Available: .gov/catdir/bibcontrol/2.3BatesReport6-03.doc.pdf

Bates, M. J. (2002). Speculations on Browsing, Directed Searching, and Linking in Relation to the Bradford Distribution. Available: is.ucla.edu/faculty/bates/articles/Searching_Bradford-m020430.html

Borgman, C. L. (1996). Why are Online Catalogs Still Hard to Use? Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47(7), 493-503. Available: .ncsu.edu/committees/itac/teams/implementation/endeca/documents/bibliography/WhyareOnlineCatalogsStillHard.pdf

Brajnik, G., et. al. (2002). Strategic Help in User Interfaces for Information Retrieval. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53(5), 343-358. Available: ey.com/10.1002/asi.10035

Buckland, M., et. al. (1999). Mapping Entry Vocabulary to Unfamiliar Metadata Vocabularies. D-Lib Magazine, 5(1). Available: b.org/d l ib/january99/buckland/01buckland.html

Chan, L. M. (2000). Exploiting LCSH, LCC, and DDC to Retrieve Networked Resources: Issues and Challenges. Available: .gov/catdir/bibcontrol/chan_paper.html.

Drabenstott, K. M. and Weller, M. S. (1996). Failure Analysis of Subject Searches in a Test of a New Design for Subject Access to Online Catalogs. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47(7), 519-537. Available: .ncsu.edu/committees/itac/teams/implementation/endeca/documents/bibliography/FailureAnalysis.pdf

Hildreth, C. R. (1995). Online Catalog Design Models: Are We Moving in the Right Direction? Washington, DC: Council on Library and Information Resources. Available: ost.liu.edu/childret/clr-opac.html

See especially:

· Chapter 4: Advanced IR Research and the Probabilistic Retrieval Model. Available: ost.liu.edu/childret/clr-fo u r.html.

· Chapter 6: Conclusion: Outline of the Next Generation of Online Catalogs. Available: ost.liu. e du/childret/clr-six.html

Khoo, C. S. G. and Wan, K.-W. (2004). A simple relevancy-ranking strategy for an interface to Boolean OPACs. The Electronic Library, 22(2), 112-120. Available: .ncsu.edu/committees/itac/teams/implementation/endeca/documents/bibliography/Si m pleRelevancyRankingStrategy.pdf

Larson, R. R., et. al. (1996). Cheshire II: Designing a Next-Generation Online Catalog. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 47(7), 555-567. Available: .berkeley.edu/jasis_paper96.pdf

Larson, R. R. (1991). Classification Clustering, Probabilistic Information Retrieval, and the Online Catalog. The Library Quarterly, 61(2), 133-173. Available: .ncsu.edu/committees/itac/teams/implementation/endeca/documents/bibliography/ClassificationClustering.pdf

Mat-Hassan, M. & Levene, M. (2005). Associating Search and Navigation Behavior Through Log Analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56(9), 913-934. Available: .ncsu.edu/committees/itac/teams/implementation/endeca/documents/bibliography/AssociatingSear c handNavigation.pdf

Micco, M. and Popp, R. (1994). Improving Library Subject Access (ILSA): A Theory of Clustering Based in Classification. Library Hi Tech, 45(12:1), 55-66. Available: .ncsu.edu/committees/itac/teams/implementation/endeca/documents/bibliography/ImprovingLibrarySubjectAccess.pdf

Nicholson, D., Shiri, A., and McCulloch, E. (2004). Appendix F: Notes on Possible Clustering-Based Enhancements to User Tool Set. In HILT Phase II Final Report. Glasgow: Centre for Digital Library Research. Available: ath.ac.uk/pubs/nicholsond/HILT2FinalAppF.pdf.