Deep-Sea and Coastal Vessel of the TGIR French Oceanographic Fleet

REPORT ON SEA CRUISE

Deep-sea and coastal vessel of the TGIR French oceanographic fleet

Form version of 10 March 2017

CRUISE REPORT:

Vessel:

REPORT ON SEA CRUISE

On a deep-sea and coastal vessel of the TGIR French oceanographic fleet

Form version of 10 MARCH 2017

The following data sheets are mandatory and must be filled in by the chief scientist within the time limit indicated and must be transmitted to the recipients indicated in the data sheet header

CRUISE REPORTS

to be sent / time limits
End of cruise evaluation data sheet / final handing over date
Fiche CSR (Cruise Summary Report) / final handing over date
End of cruise information sheet / final handing over date
International relations – contractual Relations data sheet / final handing over date
Confidential data sheet for institutional operators (if required) / final handing over date
Confidential data sheet for technical manager (if required) / final handing over date
In case of work in the Exclusive Economic Zones (EEZ), international rules require that a scientific report for each country in question be supplied within a very short time frame. Reports to be drafted by the chief scientist for each country and sent to the institutional operator who shall send them to the authorities concerned via the official diplomatic channels (MAEE). / One month after the end of the mission
For the IPEV: A definitive scientific report intended to be published in the "Rapports à la Mer" series of the "Marion-Dufresne" / Depends on the nature of the CRUISE. To be determined jointly with the IPEV.

TECHNICAL REPORTS

to be sent if necessary / time limits
Report on the use of radioelements (for vessels of the Ifremer and the INSU) / final handing over date
Report on the use of chemicals
and fume hoods (for Ifremer vessels - chemicals for INSU vessels) / final handing over date
Report of loss of equipment / final handing over date

UTILIZATION OF CRUISE RESULTS

to be sent
Survey on the utilization of cruise results / 1 year after the cruise, and then every 2 years over 5 to 10 years.

REPORT ON SEA CRUISE

On a deep-sea and coastal vessel of the TGIR French oceanographic fleet

Form version of 10 MARCH 2017

CRUISE REPORTS

REPORT ON SEA CRUISE

On a deep-sea and coastal vessel of the TGIR French oceanographic fleet

Form version of 10 March 2017

END OF CRUISE EVALUATION SHEET

Vessel: ……… Cruise :………. Dates of the cruise:…../……..

"Quality" processes have been implemented in the fleet's operating organisations and by the technical managers.

The main objectives of these processes is the continuous improvement of practices related to the performance of the cruises and the satisfaction of the scientists.

Within this framework, the "End of cruise evaluation sheet" has been renovated. We wish to be able to measure the quality of the services and the technical and human means required to perform sea cruises.

This questionnaire is intended for:

Ø The vessel's technical managers: IPEV, CNRS/INSU, GENAVIR.

Ø And the fleet's institutional operators via the French Oceanographic Fleet UMS: CNRS/INSU, IFREMER, IPEV, IRD.

This data sheet must be filled in as of the end of the cruise before the Chief Scientist disembarks and co-signed by the Master or the OPEA (representative of the IPEV) who will send it to the technical manager via email:

Ø CNRS/INSU: (for the vessels of the Insu/Cnrs)

Ø IPEV: (for the vessels of the IPEV)

Ø GENAVIR: (for vessels of the Ifremer and the IRD)

The chief scientist must send a copy of this data sheet to the institutional operators to the following address: pr

Since this document is likely to be widely distributed some of the information might have to be treated as confidential. To this end there are two confidential sheets which can be sent:

Ø the first one, to the institutional operators, to the address shown on the data sheet.

Ø the second one, to GENAVIR, to , for vessels of the Ifremer and the IRD.

Date:

Chief scientist: Master or OPEA (IPEV):

Signature: Signature:

REPORT ON SEA CRUISE

On a deep-sea and coastal vessel of the TGIR French oceanographic fleet

Form version of 10 March 2017

- List of on-board scientific and technical personnel during the cruise:

Indicate the speciality: scientist, engineer or technician, specifying the discipline (geology, physics, chemistry, biology, mechanics, electronics, data processing, etc.)

Surname / First name / Speciality
(geology, physics, chemistry, biology, mechanics, electronics, data processing, etc.) / Responsibility
and role on board
(data, analyses, etc.) / Employing organisation / Head office of the employing organisation (1) / Status(2) / Cruise legs
F / E / A / Ch(3) / ITA / Doct. / Etu. / P. sed. / Other / 1 / 2 / 3
TOTAL number of on-board persons, by category

(1) F: France, E: Europe, A: Other countries

(2) Ch: Research scientists, ITA: ITA or technician, Doct.:doctorandus, Etu: Student, P. sed.: Office personnel and technical manager, Other: others (observers, etc.)

(3) Definition of on-board research scientist:

ü Research scientist, including post-doctorandus,

ü engineer with research activity,

ü engineer-research scientist (in the sense of research scientist in marine technologies) considered as a research scientist.

Quantitative assessment of the operations:

List of operations / Operations / Data
Requested
"Cruise request" / Selected
"Mission preparation report"
(CRPM) / Performed / % of success
Performed/Selected / Sent
to the Chief Scientist
on / Sent
to the SISMER
Raw
on / Sent
to the SISMER
Post-treatment
on

Specify weather incidents or changes of strategy of the cruise which caused deviation from the initial objective:

REPORT ON SEA CRUISE

On a deep-sea and coastal vessel of the TGIR French oceanographic fleet

Form version of 10 MARCH 2017

END OF CRUISE TECHNICAL AND EVALUATION SHEET

Marking from 1 to 4 (best mark)

n/a / 1 / 2 / 3 / 4
Not Applicable / Poor / Passing / Good / Excellent

1. Poor. Difficulties or incidents having a major repercussion on the expedition (e.g. abandon of specific operations).

2. Fair. Notable difficulties or incidents having a repercussion on the expedition (e.g. significant reduction in the number of operations).

3. Good. Operations as normal, no repercussions on expedition schedule or operations even in the case of minor, resolved, difficulties (e.g. operations globally successful).

4. Excellent. Operations as normal. No incidents (e.g. operations fully successful).

Please comment all evaluations marked 3 or under for areas of improvement.

A - Planning

n/a / 1 / 2 / 3 / 4
Respect of time constraints (within the year) imposed by the scientific objectives
Appropriateness of the cruise dates in relation to the associated scientific programmes (ANR, FP7,…)