S1 Measured rates of fine-root decay (k values) in moist tropical forests and plantations.
______
LocationMethodMaterialSize Classk (a-1)Notes
______
Puerto Ricoaaboveground mesh bagsDacryodes excelsa<2 mm live0.83
Puerto Ricoaaboveground mesh bagsPrestoea montana<2 mm live0.60
Puerto Ricobtrenched plotsmixed species2 mm, severed0.4forest
Puerto Ricobtrenched plotsmixed species2 mm, severed0.8lower gap
Puerto Ricobtrenched plotsmixed species2 mm, severed0.9upper gap
Hawaii, USAcburied mesh bagsMetrosideros polymorphah<2 mm live0.419Thurston (C)
Hawaii, USAcburied mesh bagsMetrosideros polymorphah<2 mm live0.483Thurston (+N)
Hawaii, USAcburied mesh bagsMetrosideros polymorphah<2 mm live0.470Thurston (+P)
Hawaii, USAcburied mesh bagsMetrosideros polymorphah<2 mm live0.405Laupahoehoe
Hawaii, USAcburied mesh bagsMetrosideros polymorphah<2 mm live0.261Koke'e (C)
Hawaii, USAcburied mesh bagsMetrosideros polymorphah<2 mm live0.333Koke'e (+N)
Hawaii, USAcburied mesh bagsMetrosideros polymorphah<2 mm live0.387Koke'e (+P)
Costa Rica, LBSdburied mesh bagsDrypetes glauca<2 mm live0.593foreign roots
Costa Rica, LBSdburied mesh bagsPinus elliottii<2 mm live0.340foreign roots
Costa Rica, MTVdburied mesh bagsDrypetes glauca<2 mm live0.463foreign roots
Costa Rica, MTVdburied mesh bagsPinus sp.<2 mm live0.347foreign roots
Panamadburied mesh bagsDrypetes glauca<2 mm live0.980foreign roots
Panamadburied mesh bagsPinus elliottii<2 mm live0.494foreign roots
Puerto Ricodburied mesh bagsDrypetes glauca<2 mm live0.919
Puerto Ricodburied mesh bagsPinus elliottii<2 mm live0.501foreign roots
Pará, Braziletrenched plotsmixed species2 mm, severed0.96clay
Pará, Braziletrenched plotsmixed species2 mm, severed0.61sandy loam
São Paulo, Brazilfaboveground mesh bagsEucalyptus grandis<1 mm live0.56loamy Oxisol
São Paulo, Brazilfaboveground mesh bagsEucalyptus grandis1-3 mm live0.57loamy Oxisol
São Paulo, Brazilfburied mesh bagsEucalyptus grandis<1 mm live0.61loamy Oxisol
São Paulo, Brazilfburied mesh bagsEucalyptus grandis1-3 mm live0.70loamy Oxisol
São Paulo, Brazilfaboveground mesh bagsEucalyptus grandis<1 mm live0.33sandy Entisol
São Paulo, Brazilfaboveground mesh bagsEucalyptus grandis1-3 mm live0.63sandy Entisol
São Paulo, Brazilfburied mesh bagsEucalyptus grandis<1 mm live0.55sandy Entisol
São Paulo, Brazilfburied mesh bagsEucalyptus grandis1-3 mm live0.65sandy Entisol
Costa Ricaintact soil coresHieronyma alchorneoidesg2 mm, starvedh 1.36this study
Costa Ricaintact soil coresPentaclethra macrolobag2 mm, starvedh 1.28this study
Costa Ricaintact soil coresVirola koschnyig2 mm,, starvedh 0.29this study
Costa Ricaintact soil coresVochysia guatemalensisg2 mm, starvedh 2.00this study
______
a Bloomfield et al. (1993).
b Silver and Vogt (1993).
c Ostertag and Hobbie (1999).
d Gholz et al. (2000). The same samples were described by Cusack et al (2009), whocalculated k differently, and who included data for Andropogon gerardii,a U.S. prairie grass. Both publications also provide data from Guanica State Forest in Puerto Rico, but thatsite isdryand is not included in this tabulation.
e Silver et al. (2005).
f Mello et al. (2007), who provide additional data fromnewly clear-cut plantations that are not included here.
g Roots were not sorted to species prior to use, but were primarily those of the species named.
h Trees were girdled 1-2 months prior to study.
1