CRC Matriculation Meeting Minutes – 11/23/11

Cosumnes River College

Matriculation Committee Meeting Minutes

November 23, 2011

1

CRC Matriculation Meeting Minutes – 11/23/11

COMMITTEE:

Faculty:

David Aagaard

Carol Bernardo

Ryan Connally

Kathy Degn

Lynn Fowler (Chair)PR

Yolanda Garcia Gomez

James Giacomazzi

Shihni Giedd

Elizabeth Huffman

Lance Parks

Celia Samaniego

Administration

Liz Belyea

Michael Marion

Robert Montanez

Christine Thomas

Classified

Richard AndrewsPR

Brad Brazil

Tiffany Clark

Roseanne Coelho

Eva Rhodes (Recorder)PR

Genevieve Siwabessy

Peggy Ursin

Kristie West

Students

Svetlana CrenshawPR

1

CRC Matriculation Meeting Minutes – 11/23/11

  1. Call to order
  2. The meeting was called to order at 3:15 p.m. by the Chair, Lynn Fowler.
  3. The October 26th minutes were reviewed and will be distributed once suggested edits are made.
  4. Lynn went over the attachments she sent to committee members before the meeting. She pointed out that the first page and a half of the 14-page Report of the October 27, 2011 Meeting of the National Collegiate Athletic Association Division I Board of Directorsdocument is the most important to review on athletic academic performance.

Reports

  1. District Matriculation Committee Minutes
  2. Lynn mentioned that the October 17, 2011 District Matriculation Committee (DMC) meeting minutes were included in the email sent out to committee members. Committee members also reviewed the answer to question 6 of the Priority Registration Criteria form, dated 10/17/11 which offers “suggested placement and language within the existing LRCCD Administrative Regulations.”

New Business

  1. Review/Comment on Priority Registration Draft
  2. Committee members discussed other criteria listed in the Priority Registration Criteria form, dated 10/24/11, and what questions worked and which ones need to be tweaked.
  3. Lynn and Richard Andrews reviewed the verbiage and their suggestions are as follows:
  4. Change the word proposed to reviewed in the sentence that begins, “Proposed changes to priority registration . . .
  5. Add the fact that once the proposals are reviewed by the DMC, their recommendations will be forwarded to the Academic Senate.
  6. Grammatically, item 4 should read, “Are there data . . .” instead of “Is there data . . .”
  7. Also, in item 4, the Chair recommended removing the word “preferential,” as well as other words that can have more than one meaning.
  8. Item 5 is not an easy question to answer because any change to registration can either positively or negatively impact students. It would be helpful to ask questions that can be reasonably answered such as, “Who is in the group,” instead of “what is the size of the group?”
  9. While items 2 and 3 are clear, the committee was unsure about where to find the data asked for in item 4.
  10. Lynn and Richard described the various priority levels for Lana.
  11. Items from the floor
  12. Items will be heard at the next scheduled meeting.

Meeting adjourned at 4:15 p.m.

1