Council for Standards in
Human Service Education
Assuring the quality, consistency, and relevance of human service education programs.
http://www.cshse.org
Lead Reader Report to VPA to Request Additional Information Prior to Board Action
NOTE: This form is to be used when a majority of the readers independently determine the self-study does not provide adequate evidence of compliance with the Standards and Specifications or that the previous CSHSE recommendations have not been sufficiently addressed (see CSHSE Reader/Site Visitor Policy, Section A.6.).
A. Program Information
1. Institution name:
2. Program name:
3. Individuals to whom VPA letter will be sent (see names on Certification of Self-Study Page):
a. Names and titles:
b. Email and mailing address for contact person responsible for the self-study:
4. Accreditation status:
a. Initial: ____
b. Reaccreditation: ____
i. Date of initial accreditation: ______
ii. Date of last reaccreditation: ______
c. Degree level [indicate all that apply]:
AAS ___ AS ___BA/BS ___ Master’s ___
d. Site visit required: ___ No site visit required: ____
5. Brief description of the program [pertinent information can include specialty options, certificate programs, satellite campuses, how long the program has been in existence, etc.]
B. Reader Information
1. Lead Reader/Site Visitor (SV1):
2. Additional Readers [if there is a site visit, identify the co-site visitor (SV2)]
a.
b.
c.
C. List of Required Core Courses for all students in the program(s):
D. Concerns/questions/recommendations related to the Standards, including introductory material and program response to recommendations from previous accreditation, if appropriate: [For each concern, identify the Standard and Specification(s) in question; include relevant comments from all readers for all concerns noted]
E. Additional Reader Recommendations not required by or related to the Standards: [Recommendations here might relate to ways a program might enhance compliance with a Standard even though not required by the Standard or to important program issues not included in the Standards, etc.]
F. Overall quality of the self-study: [Consider the following: Is the Self-Study Template completed correctly? Is it sufficiently well-documented? Is it thorough? Does it address each standard and its specifications? Is it easy to read, follow and verify? Is the navigation between the self-study narrative and supporting documents straightforward and user friendly? Is it well written and edited? Etc.]
Report submitted by:
Date of submission of report:
Lead Reader Report to VPA to Request Additional Information August 2012 Page 2 of 2