252x0763 11/03/07

Corrected ECO252 QBA2Name

SECOND EXAM Class______

Nov 1-5 2007 Student Number______

Show your work! Make Diagrams! Exam is normed on 50 points. Answers without reasons are not usually acceptable.

- If you are not using the supplement table, make sure that I know it.

1.

2.

3.

4. (Do not try to use the t table to get this.)

II. (5+ points) Do all the following. Look them over first – There is a section III in the in-class exam and the computer problem is at the end.Show your work where appropriate. There is a penalty for not doing Problem 1a.

Note the following:

1. This test is normed on 50 points, but there are more points possible including the take-home. You are unlikely to finish the exam and might want to skip some questions.

2. A table identifying methods for comparing 2 samples is at the end of the exam.

3. If you answer ‘None of the above’ in any question, you should provide an alternative answer and explain why. You may receive credit for this even if you are wrong.

4. Use a 5% significance level unless the question says otherwise.

5. Read problems carefully. A problem that looks like a problem on another exam may be quite different.

6. Make sure that you state your null and alternative hypothesis, that I know what method you are using and what the conclusion is when you do a statistical test.

1. (Groebner) We wish to compare the amount of time men and women spend in the supermarket. The two columns below, and represent two independent samples with 7 shoppers in each sample. You may assume that the parent distributions are Normal.

MenWomenDifference

Row

1 33 33 0

2 43 33 10

3 23 26 -3

4 29 41 -12

5 33 33 0

6 37 48 -11

7 26 44 -18

Minitab computes the following.

Variable N Mean SE Mean StDev Minimum Q1 Median Q3 Maximum

x1 7 32.00 2.55 6.76 23.00 26.00 33.00 37.00 43.00

x2 7 36.86 2.91 7.69 26.00 33.00 33.00 44.00 48.00

d 7 -4.86 -18.00 -12.00 -3.00 0.00 10.00

a. Compute the sample variance for the column – Show your work! (2)

b. Is there a significant difference between the variances for men and women? State your hypotheses and your conclusion clearly! (2)

c. Test to see there is a difference between the average amount of time men and women shop. (3)

d. Using the sample means and standard deviations computed above and changing each sample size from 7 to 100, find a 91% 2-sided confidence interval for the difference between the amount of time men and women shop. Does it indicate a significant difference between men’s and women’s times? Why? (3) [10]

III. (18+ points) Do as many of the following as you can. (2points each unless noted otherwise). Look them over first – the computer problem is at the end.Show your work where appropriate.

Note that if you have a table like this , and if you know one number on the inside of the table, you can get the rest by subtracting.

A professor wishes to see if the variability of scores for people taking the introductory accounting course is different. He takes a sample of the scores of 13 non-accounting students and 10 accounting students and gets the following results: and . Though this is a 2-sided test with a 95% confidence level, he can actually do the entire test by comparing

a) against

b) against

c) against

d) against

e) against

f) against

g) against

h) against

2. ______

is, at most, ______. If you did not get this from the Supplementary Tables, you must explain how you found this.

Exhibit 1: Sample sizeMeanStd Deviation

Married 25 268.90 77.25

Unmarried 30 455.10 102.40

Standard error 24.2534

Difference between means -186.20

(Groebner et. al.) Bank managers want to find out if an incentive interest rate will cause more of an increase in spending by married cardholders than by unmarried cardholders. Let represent the increase of spending by a random sample of 25 married cardholders and represent increase of spending by a random sample of 30 unmarried cardholders. Sample data is above.

3. If the bank finds that the difference between married and unmarried couples is .

a. The difference is statistically significant because 186.20 is larger than 110.03

b. The difference is statistically significant because the confidence interval supports a null hypothesis.

c. The difference is statistically insignificant because 110.03 is smaller than 186.20.

d. The difference is statistically insignificant because the confidence interval would lead us to reject a null hypothesis.

4. If the researcher is trying to show that unmarried cardholders will increase their spending more than married cardholders, and, assuming that the population mean is appropriate to compare salaries, , her null hypothesis should be:

a.

b.

c.

d.

e.

f.

g. None of the above

5. If the researcher in exhibit 1 is attempting to show that unmarried cardholders will spend significantly more than married cardholders the appropriate critical value for the difference between the sample means is (assuming that is chosen correctly):

a.

b.

c.

d.

e.

f.

6. If the researcher does not believe that the population standard deviation for men and women are both the same, the appropriate degrees of freedom for the test (in problem 5) are:

a. 53

b. Gotten by the formula

c. 25 (The smaller of 25 and 30)

d. 55

e. None of the above. (Use instead of .)

7. I am testing the hypothesis . I get a value of , which results in a p-value of .076. What are the p-values for and ?

a. Both are .076

b. Both are .038

c. The first is .038 and the second is .962

d. The first is .962 and the second is .038

e. Both are .962

f. Not enough information[14]

8. A 2007 survey (Baltic Surveys for the International Republican Institute) of a sample of 1062 opinions in Moldova asked what countries are the greatest social and economic threats to Moldova. The data presented said that 23% (244 people) said that Russia was one of those countries and that 25% (265) that the US was one.

a) If 15% (159 people) said that both of the countries are in this threatening group, and country 1 is Russia and country 2 is the US, and we wish to test the statement that the US is significantly less popular than Russia in Moldova, what would our null and alternative hypotheses be? Answer in terms of , and , or and or , and as appropriate. (Example if , and were a reasonable answer, you might get two points for saying , and wrongly saying that this becomes and the corresponding ) (3)

b) Test this hypothesis using the data above (4) (Note that it is possible to get a) right and still choose the wrong method, if this happens there will be partial credit.) [21]

9. A 2007 survey (Baltic Surveys for the International Republican Institute) of a sample of 1062 opinions in Moldova asked if a family member was working abroad. 62% said yes. A similar survey in 2004 found 64% saying yes to the same question. If we assume that the earlier survey included 1000 people and that the two surveys are independent random samples, can we say that there has been a significant change in the number working abroad? (State and test your null and alternate hypotheses.)(5) [28]

10. Computer question.

a. Turn in your first computer output. Only do b, c and d if you did. (3)

b. (Groebner) A rental car company has just stared to rent SUVs to individuals. It has long experience with automobiles and knows that highway miles per gallon exceeds mpg in cities. To verify this it takes a random sample of 25 SUVs driven on the highway (sample 1) and a second sample of 25 SUVs driven in the city (sample 2). Actually this was done by giving each renter 14 gallons and having them drive until they ran out of gas. At this point they were picked up and given a coupon good for another week’s rental. Excel computation from these data said that for highway driving, the sample mean was 19.6468 mpg and the sample standard deviation was 18.4637. Corresponding figures for city driving were 16.6064 and 29.6064. What areour null and alternative hypotheses? (1)

c. Is the appropriate computer run A or B below? Why? (1)

d. What is our conclusion – do we reject the null hypothesis using a 5% significance level? Why? Can we say that highway mpg was higher than city mpg?(2)

e. On the basis of run C, could we have made things easier by assuming equal variances? Why? (1) [36]

MTB > TwoT 25 19.6468 18.4637 25 16.6064 29.6064;

SUBC> Alternative -1.

A) Two-Sample T-Test and CI

Sample N Mean StDev SE Mean

1 25 19.6 18.5 3.7

2 25 16.6 29.6 5.9

Difference = mu (1) - mu (2)

Estimate for difference: 3.04040

95% upper bound for difference: 14.79096

T-Test of difference = 0 (vs <): T-Value = 0.44 P-Value = 0.667 DF = 40

MTB > TwoT 25 19.6468 18.4637 25 16.6064 29.6064;

SUBC> Alternative 1.

B) Two-Sample T-Test and CI

Sample N Mean StDev SE Mean

1 25 19.6 18.5 3.7

2 25 16.6 29.6 5.9

Difference = mu (1) - mu (2)

Estimate for difference: 3.04040

95% lower bound for difference: -8.71016

T-Test of difference = 0 (vs >): T-Value = 0.44 P-Value = 0.333 DF = 40

MTB > VarTest 15 18.4637 15 29.6064.

C) Test for Equal Variances

95% Bonferroni confidence intervals for standard deviations

Sample N Lower StDev Upper

1 15 3.01576 4.29694 7.28309

2 15 3.81883 5.44118 9.22251

F-Test (normal distribution)

Test statistic = 0.62, p-value = 0.388

Blank

ECO252 QBA2

SECOND EXAM

March 23, 2007

TAKE HOME SECTION

-

Name: ______

Student Number: ______

Class hours registered and attended (if different):______

IV. Neatness Counts! Show your work! Always state your hypotheses and conclusions clearly.(19+ points). In each section state clearly what number you are using to personalize data. There is a penalty for failing to include your student number on this page, not stating version number in each section and not including class hour somewhere. Please write on only one side of the paper. You must do 3a (penalty).

1. (Groebner, et. al.) Your company produces hair driers for retailers to sell as house brands. A design change will produce considerable savings, but the new design will not be adopted unless it is more reliable. For a sample of 250 hair driers with the old design, 75 failed in a simulated 1-year period. For a sample of 250 driers with the new design fail in a simulated one year period, where is the second-to-last digit of your student number. Use a 90% confidence level. Make sure that I know what value you are using for .

a) Can we say that the proportion of the redesigned driers that fail is significantly lower than that of the driers with the current design? (3)

b) Do a 95% two-sided confidence interval for the difference between the two proportions. (1)

c) After you have implemented your decision on using the new design, a newly-hired engineer recommends another design change (the newest design) that she claims will decrease the proportion that fail even further. For a sample of 100 driers, 18 fail in a simulated one-year period. Do a test of the equality of the three proportions, again using a 90% confidence level. (4)

d) Follow your results in c) with a Marascuilo procedure for finding pairwise differences between the proportions for the three designs. Assuming that there is no cost-saving in going to the newest design, would you recommend going to it? Write a paragraph long report on your conclusions from the two hypothesis tests and what decisions these implied. (4) [12]

2. (Groebner et al) A ripsaw is cutting lumber into narrow strips and should be set to produce a product whose width differs from the width specified by an amount given by a Normal distribution with a mean of zero and a standard deviation of 0.01 inch. Because we have been getting complaints about the uniformness of our product, we wish to verify the Normal distribution specified is correct. We cut pieces (where is the last digit of your student number. Our results are as follows.

Deviation from specified width / Number of pieces
Below -0.02 / 0
-0.02 to -0.01 / 84
-0.01 to 0 / 266
0 to 0.01 / 150 +
0.01 to 0.02 / 94
0.02 and above / 6

a) To use a chi-squared procedure to check the distribution, find the values of (3)

b) State and test the null hypothesis. (2)

c) We have learned another procedure that can be used to test for a Normal distribution when the parameters are given. Use it now to verify your results. Can you say that the saw is working as advertised? (4) [21]

3. (Groebner et al.) Two groups of 16 individuals were asked to do their income taxes using two tax preparation software packages. The data is below (in number of minutes required) and may be considered two independent random samples. To personalize the data add the last digit of your student number to every number in the TT00 column. Use 10 if your number ends in 0. Label the column clearly as TT1, TT2 through TT10 according to the number used. Let .

Row TT00 TC

1 65 88

2 51 71

3 74 89

4 89 66

5 88 78

6 96 64

7 37 74

8 66 99

9 86 79

10 54 68

11 60 93

12 45 93

13 42 86

14 55 86

15 58 81

16 38 83

Minitab has given us the following results

Variable N N* Mean SE Mean StDev Minimum Q1 Median Q3 Maximum

TC 16 0 81.13 2.60 10.40 64.00 71.75 82.00 88.75 99.00

TT1 16 0 63.75 4.76 19.05 38.00 47.50 60.00 84.00 97.00

TT2 16 0 64.75 4.76 19.05 39.00 48.50 61.00 85.00 98.00

TT3 16 0 65.75 4.76 19.05 40.00 49.50 62.00 86.00 99.00

TT4 16 0 66.75 4.76 19.05 41.00 50.50 63.00 87.00 100.00

TT5 16 0 67.75 4.76 19.05 42.00 51.50 64.00 88.00 101.00

TT6 16 0 68.75 4.76 19.05 43.00 52.50 65.00 89.00 102.00

TT7 16 0 69.75 4.76 19.05 44.00 53.50 66.00 90.00 103.00

TT8 16 0 70.75 4.76 19.05 45.00 54.50 67.00 91.00 104.00

TT9 16 0 71.75 4.76 19.05 46.00 55.50 68.00 92.00 105.00

TT10 16 0 72.75 4.76 19.05 47.00 56.50 69.00 93.00 106.00

a) Find the mean and standard deviation of . (1) Assume the Normal distribution in b), c), and e).

b) Find out if there is a significant difference between the mean times for the two packages, using a test ratio, a critical value or a confidence interval.(4) (2 extra points if you use all three methods and get the same results on all three, 3 extra (extra) points if you do not assume equal variances)

c) Test the variances of the two samples for equality on the assumption that they come from the Normal distribution. (2)

d) Test the column to see if the data was Normally distributed (5)

e) Actually the data above was taken from only 16 people, who were randomly assigned to use one of the methods first. Would this mean that what you did above was correct? If not do b) over again. (3)

f) In view of the fact that the data was taken from only 16 people and dropping the assumption of Normality, find out if there is a significant difference between the medians of the two packages. (3)

g) If you did d) e) and f), can you report on your results, indicating which result was correct? (1) [40]

Be prepared to turn in your Minitab output for the first computer problem and to answer the questions on the problem sheet about it or a similar problem.

4. (Extra Credit) Check your work on Minitab. Remind me that you did extra credit on your front page.

For a Chi-squared test of Independence or Homogeneity, put your observed data in adjoining columns. Use the Stat pull-down menu. Choose Tables and then Chi Squared Test. Your output will show and as a single table. You will be given a p-value for the hypothesis of Independence or Homogeneity.

For a test of Normality, when sample mean and variance are to be computed from the sample, put your complete set of numbers in one column. . Use the Stat pull-down menu. Choose Basic Statistics and then Normality test. Check Kolmogorov-Smirnov to get a Lilliefors test. You will be given a p-value for the hypothesis of Normality.

For a Chi-squared test of goodness of fit, put your observed data in C1 and your expected data or frequencies in C2. The expected data may be proportions adding to 1 or counts adding to . Use the Stat pull-down menu. Choose Tables and then Chi Squared Test of Goodness of Fit. Pick specific proportions or historic counts. Observed counts is C1 and the other column requested will be C2. The computed degrees of freedom will have to be reduced if you computed any statistics from the data before setting up the expected count or frequency. You are warned not to use expected counts below 5.

For a test of Two Proportions, Use the Stat pull-down menu. Choose Basic Statistics and then Two Proportions. Check Summarized Data and then enter and . Use Options to set the inequality in the alternate hypotheses and check Pooled Estimate unless you are doing a confidence interval.

To fake computation of a sample variance or standard deviation of the data in column c1 using column c2 for the squares,

MTB > let C2 = C1*C1* performs multiplication

MTB > name k1 'sum'** would do a power, but multiplication

MTB > name k2 'sumsq'is more accurate.

MTB > let k1 = sum(c1)

MTB > let k2 = sum(c2) This is equivalent to let k2 = ssq(c1)

MTB > print k1 k2

Data Display This is a progress report for my data

sum 3047.24set.

sumsq 468657

MTB > name k1 'meanx'

MTB > let k1 = k1/count(c1)/means division. Count gives n.

MTB > let k2 = k2 - (count(c1))*k1*k1

MTB > print k1 k2

Data Display

meanx 152.362

sumsq 4372.53

MTB > name k2 'varx'

MTB > let k2 = k2/((count(c1))-1)

MTB > print k1 k2

Data Display

meanx 152.362

varx 230.133

MTB > name k2 'stdevx'

MTB > let k2 = sqrt(k2)Sqrt gives a square root.

MTB > print k1 k2

Data Display

meanx 152.362

stdevx 15.1701

Print C1, C2

To check your mean and standard deviation, use

`MTB > describe C1

To check for equal variances for data in C1 and C2, use

MTB > VarTest c1 c2;

SUBC> Unstacked.

Both an F test and a Levine test will be run.

To put a items in column C1 in order in column C2, use

MTB > Sort c1 c2;

SUBC> By c1.

Commands like Count C1, Sum C1 and SSq C1 can be used alone without Let if the values don’t need to be stored. In the above I have continuously named and renamed the constants k1 and k2. There are many constants in Minitab on an invisible worksheet. (k1 …….k100 at least), so you can preserve your results by using separate locations for subsequent computations.