Concept Mapping Bibliography

1.  (1995) Classroom of the Future: Problem solving: Concept maps [WWW document]. URL http://cotf.edu/ETE/concept.html (visited May 14, 1996)

  1. Abrams, R., Kothe, D., & Iuli, R. Meaningful learning: A collaborative literature review of concept mapping [WWW document]. URL http://132.236.243.86/MLRG/CLR-ConceptMapping.htm (visited 1996, February 1)

3.  Ahlberg, M. (1993, August 1-4). Concept maps, Vee diagrams and rhetorical argumentation analysis (RAA): Three educational theory-based tools to facilitate meaningful learning. Paper presented at the Third International Seminar on Misconceptions and Educational Strategies in Science and Mathematics, Ithaca, NY.

  1. Akkaya, Recai; Karakırık, Erol & Durmuş, Soner. (2005). A computer assessment tool for concept mapping. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology – TOJET July 2005 ISSN: 1303-6521 volume 4 Issue 3 Article 1. Abant Izzet Baysal University, Faculty of Education
  2. Al-Kunifed, A., & Wandersee, J. H. (1990). One hundred references related to concept mapping. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(10), 1069-1075.
  3. Anderson-Inman, L., & Zeitz, L. (1993). Computer-based concept-mapping: Active studying for active learners. The Computing Teacher, 1993(August/September), 6-11.
  4. Anderson-Inman, L., & Zeitz, L. (1994). Beyond Notecards: Synthesizing information with electronic study tools. The Computing Teacher, 1994(May), 21-25.

8.  Andeweg, B. (1995). Mindmappen. TEKST[BLAD](3), 27-30.

9.  Arborworks. (1993). Learning Tool for Apple Macintosh. (1.1 ed.). Ann Arbor, MI: Author.

  1. Austin, L. B., & Shore, B. M. (1995). Using concept mapping for assessment in physics. Physics Education, 30(1), 41-45.
  2. Bareholz, H., & Tamir, P. (1992). A comprehensive use of concept mapping in design instruction and assessment. Research in Science and Technology Education, 10(1), 37-52.
  3. Belmonte, M. (1997). Mapas conceptuales y uves heurísticas de Gowin. Técnicas para todas las áreas de enseñanzas medias Bilbao: Mensajero.
  4. Bernard, R. M., & Naidu, S. (1992). Post-quiestioning, concept mapping and feedback: a distance education field experiment. British Journal of Educational Technology, 23(1), 48-60.
  5. Beyerbach, B. A. (1988). Developing a technical vocabulary on teacher planning: Preservice teachers' concept maps. Teacher & Teacher Education, 4(4), 339-347.
  6. Beyerbach, B. A., & Smith, J. M. (1990). Using a computerized concept mapping program to assess preservice teachers' thinking about effective teaching. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(10), 961-971.
  7. Blake, Athony. (2004). Helping Young Children to See What Is Relevant and Why: Supporting Cognitive Change in Earth Science Using Analogy. Research Report. International Journal of Science Education, v26 n15 p1855-1873. (EJ682148)
  8. Bosma, M. (1995). Anatomie van de gedachte. Management Team(1 December), 84,85,87.

18.  Boyer, P. D. (1997Concept Mapping FAQ Sheet [WWW document]. URL http://cs.uwp.edu/staff/boyer/100/concept.mapping.faq.html (visited 21 February 1997)

  1. Buz, T. & Buz, B. (1996) El libro de los mapas mentales. Barcelona: Ediciones Urano
  2. Buzan, T. (1994). What is a Mind Map? A brief introduction, Windows Mind Mapper Version 1.0b (1.0b ed., ). In Program Helpfile: EGLE Magic.

21.  Buzan, T. (1995). The MindMap book. (2 ed.). London, UK: BBC Books.

  1. Calori, R., Johnson, G., & Sarnin, P. (1994). CEOs' cognitive maps and the scope of the organization. Strategic Management Journal, 15, 437-457.
  2. Cañas, A. J. (1988) "Algunas ideas sobre la educación y las Herramientas Computacionales Necesarias para Apoyar su implementación" Memoria del IX Congreso Internacional sobre Tecnología y Educación a Distancia, San José, Costa Rica. Reimpreso en Red: Educación y Formación Profesional a Distancia, Ministerio de Educación, España (1999) Disponible en línea en: http://www.ihmc.us/users/acanas/Publications/RevistaInformaticaEducativa/HerramientasConsConRIE.htm
  3. Cañas, A.J. et al. (2000). Herramientas para construir y compartir modelos de
  4. conocimiento basados en mapas conceptuales. http://cmap.coginst.uwf.edu/info/mars.gif

26.  Cañas, A. J. et al. Using Concept Map with technology to enhance collaborative

27.  learning in Latin America. http://www.ihmc.us/index.html

28.  Carlson, P. A., & Larralde, V. (1991+). Combining concept mapping and adaptive advice to teach reading comprehension. .

29.  Castaño, C. (2004). Utilización de mapas conceptuales para la construcción de modelos de conocimiento. Comunicación y Pedagogía, 194, 75-78

  1. Crandell, T. L., Kleid, N. A., & Soderston, C. (1996). Empirical evaluation of concept mapping: A job performance aid for writers. Technical Communication(2nd quarter), 157-163.
  2. Coco, Clare. (1999). Instructional Scaffolding Intervention and Concept Mapping Outcomes among Diverse Learners in a Pre-Service Educational Psychology Course: A Model for Developing Expertise in Writing Expressions of Conceptual Understanding. Working paper (pdf). (ED429943)
  3. Costamagna, A. M. (2001). Mapas conceptuales como expresión de procesos de interrelación para evaluar la evolución del conocimiento de alumnos universitarios. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 19, 309-318.
  4. Cullen, J. (1990). Using concept maps in chemistry: An alternative view. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(10), 1067-1068.
  5. Del Castillo, J. M. y Barberán, O. (2001). Mapas conceptuales en matemáticas. http://www.netdidactica.com/articulos/mapas.htm

35.  Dewey, R. (1995). Web links as a map of conceptual dependencies [WWW document]. URL http://www.gasou.edu/psychweb/discuss/chap00/links.htm (visited February 16, 1996)

  1. Donald, J. G. (1983). Knowledge structures: Methods for exploring course content. Journal of Higher Education, 54(1), 31-41.
  2. Dyrud, M. A. (1994). Mapping: A collaborative activity for fun and profit. The Bulletin of the Association for Business Communication, 57(2), 57-58.
  3. Edmondson, K. M. (1995). Concept mapping for the development of medical curricula. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(7), 777-793.

39.  Eischens, J. (1995, September). Concept mapping with Earthwatching III [WWW document]. URL http://www.seagrant.wisc.edu/Communications/Earthwatch/Teachers/TeachersGuide.html (visited 1996, March 8)

  1. Esiobu, G. O., & Soyibo, K. (1995). Effects of concept and vee mapping under three learning modes on students' cognitive achievement in ecology and genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(9), 971-995.

41.  Enger, Sandra K. (1998). Students' Conceptual Understanding: Qualitative Evidence in Concept Maps. (ED427060).

42.  Enyedy, Noel. (2005). Inventing Mapping: Creating Cultural Forms to Solve Collective Problems. Cognition & Instruction, v23 n4 p427-466. (EJ722493)

  1. Fernlund, P. M. (1995). Teaching for conceptual change. In B. G. Blair & R. N. Caine (Eds.), Integrative learning as the pathway to teaching holism, complexity and interconnectedness (pp. 45-60). Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen.
  2. Fisher, K. M. (1990). Semantic networking: The new kid on the block. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(10), 1001-1018.

45.  Freeman, Lee A.; Urbaczewski, Andrew. Concept Maps as an Alternative Technique for Assessing Students' Understanding of Telecommunications. (ED481741).

46.  Gaines, B. R., & Shaw, M. L. G. (1995?Collaboration through Concept Maps [WWW document].

47.  Gulyaev, Sergei A.; Stonyer, Heather R. (2002). Making a Map of Science: General Systems Theory as a Conceptual Framework for Tertiary Science Education. International Journal of Science Education, v24 n7 p753-69. (EJ652765)

48.  Hale, S. Concept Mapping [WWW document]. URL http://www.dc.peachnet.edu/~shale/humanities/composition/handouts/concept.html (visited May 29, 1996)

49.  Hansson, Örjan. (2005). Preservice teachers’ view on y = x + 5 and y = p.x2 expressed through the utilization of concept maps: a study of the concept of function. Kristianstad University/Luleå University of Technology, Sweden. International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Paper presented at the Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (29th, Melbourne, Australia, Jul 10-15, 2005), v3 p97-104.

50.  Hara, Noriko. (2002). Analysis of Computer-Mediated Communication: Using Formal Concept Analysis as a Visualizing Methodology. Journal of Educational Computing Research, v26 n1 p25-49. (EJ647629).

51.  Hara, Noriko. (2000). Visualizing Tools To Analyze Online Conferences. (ED442845)

52.  Hay, David B.; Kinchin, Ian M. (2006). Using Concept Maps to Reveal Conceptual Typologies. Education & Training, v48 n2-3 p127-142 2006 (EJ738230).

  1. Hegarty-Hazel, E. (1991). Relationship between students' conceptual knowledge and study strategies-part 1: student learning in physics. International Journal of Science Education, 13(3), 303-312.
  2. Hegarty-Hazel, E., & Prosses, M. (1991). Relationship between students' conceptual knowledge and study strategies-part 2: student learning in biology. International Journal of Science Education, 13(4), 421-429.
  3. Heinze-Fry, J. A., & Novak, J. D. (1990). Concept mapping brings long-term movement toward meaningful learning. Science Education, 74(4), 461-472.

56.  Henderson, L., Patching, W., & Putt, I. (1994, June 25-30). Interactive multimedia, concept mapping, and cultural context. Paper presented at the ED-MEDIA 94, World Conference on Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.

57.  Hofman, M. E. (1995). Cognitive mapping methods: An explorative study (Working Paper Working Paper Series 1995 No. 3). Breukelen, the Netherlands: Nijenrode University, Centre for Organisational Learning and Change.

  1. Holmes, G. A., & Leitzel, T. C. (1993). Evaluating learning through a constructivist paradigm. Performance & Instruction, 32(8), 28-30.
  2. Horton, P. B., McConney, A. A., Gallo, M., Woods, A. L., Senn, G. J., & Hamelin, D. (1993). An investigation of the effectiveness of concept mapping as an instructional tool. Science Education, 77(1), 95-111.

60.  Humphreys, B. L. (1996, Match 25). NIH/NLM factsheet: UMLS semantic network [WWW document]. URL http://www.nlm.nih.gov/publications/factsheets/umls_semantic_network.html (visited May 8, 1996)

61.  Ingenerf, J. (1994, Oktober). UMLS semantic network [WWW document]. URL http://www.gsf.de/MEDWIS/dokument/umls_net.html (visited May 8, 1996)

  1. Jegede, O. J., Alaiyemola, F. F., & Okebukola, P. A. O. (1990). The effect of concept mapping on students' anxiety and achievement in biology. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27(10), 951-960.

63.  Jetter, M. (1996, February 23). MindMan ...and your ideas become visible! [WWW document]. URL http://mindman.com/english/mindman.htm (visited 1996, March 11)

  1. Jonassen, D. H. (1993). Effects of systematically structured hypertext knowledge bases on users' knowledge structures. In C. McKnight, A. Dillon, & J. Richardson (Eds.), Hypertext: A psychological perspective (pp. 153-168). Chichester, UK: Ellis Horwood.
  2. Jonassen, D. H. (1996). Computers in the classroom: Mindtools for critical thinking. Eaglewoods, NJ: Merill / Prentice Hall.
  3. Jonassen, D. H., & Grabowski, B. L. (1993). Handbook of individual differences: Learning & instruction. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

67.  Jonassen, D. H., & Marra, R. M. Concept mapping and other formalisms as mindtools for representing knowledge [WWW document]. URL http://www.icbl.ac.uk/%7egranum/class/altdocs/dav_alt.htm (visited 1996, February 1)

  1. Kealy, William A. (2001). . Knowledge Maps and Their Use in Computer-Based Collaborative Learning Environments. Journal of Educational Computing Research, v25 n4 p325-49. (EJ643543)

69.  Kinchin, Ian M. (2000). . Using Concept Maps To Reveal Understanding: A Two-Tier Analysis. School Science Review, v81 n296 p41-46. (EJ604060)

70.  Kinchin, Ian M.; Hay, David B.; Adams, Alan. (2000). How a Qualitative Approach to Concept Map Analysis Can Be Used To Aid Learning by Illustrating Patterns of Conceptual Development. Educational Research, v42 n1 p43-57. (EJ600693)

71.  Klein, Davina C. D.; Chung, Gregory K. W. K.; Osmundson, Ellen; Herl, Howard E.; O'Neil, Harold F., Jr. (2002). Examining the Validity of Knowledge Mapping as a Measure of Elementary Students' Scientific Understanding. CSE Technical Report. (ED465803).

  1. Kommers, P. A. M. (1988). Tekstnet. Enschede: Universiteit Twente.
  2. Kommers, P. A. M. (1990). Hypertext and the acquisition of knowledge. Doctoral dissertation, Universiteit Twente, Enschede.

74.  Kommers, P. A. M. (1995). Navigational- and Design Support with Concept Mapping in Educational Hypermedia (pp. 11-31).

  1. Lambiotte, J. G., Dansereau, D. F., Cross, D. R., & Reynolds, S. B. (1989). Multirelational semantic maps. Educational Psychology Review, 1(4), 331-367.

76.  Lang, Manfred; Olson, John. (2000). Intergrated Science Teaching as a Challenge for Teachers to Develop New Conceptual Structures. Research in Science Education, v30 n2 p213-24. (EJ610389)

  1. Lanzing, J.W.A. (1996, May). Concept Mapping: Tools for echoing the minds eye. In T. Velders (Ed.), Proceedings of the Fourth Internationsl Symposium on Visual Verbal Literacy: Beeldenstorm in Deventer (pp. 122-128). Deventer, The Netherlands: IVLA / Rijkshogeschool IJsselland.
  2. Lanzing, J.W.A. (1996, August). Everything you always wanted to know about ... Concept Mapping [WWW document]. URL http://utto1031.to.utwente.nl/artikel1/
  3. Lawson, M. J. (1994). Concept Mapping. In T. Husén & T. N. Postlethwaite (Eds.), The international encyclopedia of education (2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 1026-1031). Oxford: Elsevier Science.

80.  Lee, Youngmin; Baylor, Amy L.; Nelson, David W. (2005). Supporting Problem-Solving Performance Through the Construction of Knowledge Maps. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, v16 n2 p117-131 2005 (EJ726309)

81.  Liu, Xiufeng. (2004). Using Concept Mapping for Assessing and Promoting Relational Conceptual Change in Science. Science Education, v88 n3 p373-396 May 2004 (EJ759868)

  1. Liu, X., & Hichey, M. (1996). The internal consistency of a concept mapping scoring scheme and its aeefect on prediction validity. International Journal of Science Education, 18(8), 921-937.
  2. Lord, C. G., Desforges, D. M., Fein, S., Pugh, M. A., & Lepper, M. R. (1994). Typicality effects in attitude toward social policies: A concept-mapping approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(4), 658-673.

84.  Mackinnon, Gregory. (2006). Contentious Issues in Science Education: Building Critical Thinking Patterns through Two-Dimensional Concept Mapping. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, v15 n4 p433-445 Oct 2006 (EJ742383)

  1. Mahler, S., Hoz, R., Fischl, D., Tov-Ly, E., & Lernau, O. Z. (1991). Didactic use of concept mapping in higher education: Applications in medical education. Instructional Science, 20(1), 25-47.

86.  Markham, K. M., Mintzes, J. J., & Jones, M. G. (1993, August 1-4, 1993). The structure and use of biological knowledge about mammals in novice and experienced students. Paper presented at the Third international Seminar on Misconceptions and Educational Sterategies in Science and Mathematics, Ithaca, NY.

  1. Markham, K. M., Mintzes, J. J., & Jones, M. G. (1994). The concept map as a research and evaluation tool: Further evidence of validity. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(1), 91-101.
  2. Martín, E. y Solé, E. (2002): El aprendizaje significativo y la teoría de la asimilación. En Coll, C., Palacios, J. y Marchesi, A. (Compiladores). Desarrollo psicológico y educación. 2. Psicología de la educación escolar. Madrid, Alianza Editorial, 89-112.

89.  McAleese, R. A theoretical view on concept mapping [WWW document]. URL http://www.icbl.ac.uk/%7egranum/class/altdocs/ray_alt.htm (visited 1996, February 1)

90.  McCabe, D. (1995, February 17). The concept mapping workshop [WWW document]. URL http://158.132.100.221/INET_EDU.folder/Staff.Dev.Wkshps_folder/CMWkshp_folder/CncptMapp.Wkshop.html (visited June 25, 1996)

91.  McDonald, Sharon; Stevenson, Rosemary J. (1999). Spatial versus Conceptual Maps as Learning Tools in Hypertext. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, v8 n1 p43-64. (EJ584301)

92.  McNeese, M. D., Zaff, B. S., Citera, M., Brown, C. E., & Whitaker, R. (1995). AKADAM: Eliciting user knowledge to support participatory ergonomics. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 15, 345-363.

93.  Mead, J. P., & Gay, G. (1995Concept mapping: An innovative approach to digital library design and evaluation [WWW document]. URL http://edfu.lis.uiuc.edu/allerton/95/s2/mead/mead.html (visited May 29, 1996)