ATTACHMENT B

City Light Review Panel: Follow-Up Information Items Tracking List Version dated: 9/13/10

Item # / Requested on / (by) / Issue / Type of Response Needed (power point / handout / email) / Assigned to
Division Head / Date / Assignment task communicated by E. Campbell / Date Response due to Project Leads (Treat/Leiber) / To be Presented to Task Force On / Presenter needed at meeting
Yes/No – Name. / Completed /
1 / 6/30 / Results of latest customer satisfaction surveys (this year, last year) / Handout—executive summaries / Hartman / 7/28 / Sept. mtg / Yes. Hartman / Partially complete.
(see #25)
2 / 6/30 / Comparison of rated v. firm, average and peak capacity of various assets in system / generic (hydro, wind, etc.) / Powerpoint slide / Kern / 71/6 / 7/21 / Yes. Kern or … / X
3 / 6/30 / Average and low water years: graphic of demand and how that is met (owned resources v. purchased power) and when/how much power is sold. / Powerpoint slides: graphic / Kern / 7/16 / 7/21 / Yes. Kern or… / X
4 / 6/30 / Clarification of deferred O &M – how different from regular O&M (how funded, what is deferred as opposed to regular) / Powerpoint slide / Leiber / 7/16 / 7/21 / Yes. Leiber / X
5 / 6/30 / 5-year conservation plan -- what is it, how much does it cost and how does it relate to I-937? What are the choices to be made? / Summary /include explanation in conservation presentation / ? / 7/7 / 7/8 / Yes. / x
6 / 6/30 / Change in demand components –10 years ago, now, forecast 10 years out: residential, commercial, industrial / Powerpoint slide-graphics / Clement / 7/16 / 7/21 / No. / X
7 / 6/30 (KR) / I-937 / 1 page summary of requirements Copy of Statute; summary of statute / ? / 7/7 / 7/8 – handout
7/21 handout / No. / X
8 / 6/30 (EW) / Additional detail on O & M components of PSEA budget / Hand-out / Leiber / 7/16 / 7/21 / No. / X
9 / 7/1 (TK), amended 7/21 / Budget 101: how does City Light budget get put together, when, rates ,etc.-include information on who makes what decisions (Mayor, Council, Utility) / 10 minute powerpoint / Kilduff & Budget Rep (Calvin) / 8/04 / Yes / X
10 / 7/8 / Load Forecasting Powerpoint—(materials from meeting on 7/14) –please forward to entire Review Panel / Powerpoint sent by email and handout at next meeting. / By email: 7/14
Handout: 7/21 / X
11 / 7/21 / Benchmarking Reports comparing SCL to other utilities / 1.  Web site suggestions.
2.  Calendar a briefing / Leiber / Websites: 8/4
Schedule: October? / 8/4
October / No
Yes / X
12 / 7/21 / Analysis of “off-system” costs and revenues—are we making money or losing money when you look at all the things SCL does that are not directly about selling power to its customers?
If we are making money, do the ratepayers get the benefit?
On the revenue side, how does the wholesale power market’s volatility affect this? On the cost side, what is the rate impact? / Powerpoint / October or November / October or November
13 / 7/21 / Power owned/ contracted v. demand charts (regular and low water): on the columns of capacity, differentiate BPA from other contracted assets. May need additional explanation about benefits (?) of BPA contract/its impact on rates overall after the power is sold on wholesale market. / Powerpoint / 8/2 / 8/4 / Yes,
D. Clement / X
14 / 7/21 / Power demand chart from the Load Forecasting Presentation – showing total load growth, and sector growth thru 2029. / Powerpoint slide / (Dave Clement’s presentation) / 8/2 / 8/4 / no / X
15 / 7/21 / More detail on load growth: what are the efficiency assumptions? What are the growth assumptions? (at a gross level , by demand sector) / Powerpoint slides / October/
November / yes
16 / 7/21 / Rough map of where SCL assets are – generation, transmission, distribution / Handout / 8/4 / no / X
17 / 7/21 / Data on how much of the asset investment takes place for which parts of the system load? (e.g., Network investment and % of customer demand, other distribution and % of customer demand) / October/
November / Yes
17 / 7/21 / Cost impacts of the various asset management scenarios under consideration / Powerpoint presentation / October/
November / Yes
18 / 8/4 / Risk management presentation / Powerpoint presentation / September / Yes
19 / 8/4 / Monthly financial information---reports/discussion / Samples & explanation / September / Yes / X (posted reports on Review Panel Webpage)
20 / 8/4 / Power marketing: how do we know we’re doing it right/the best we can, given how much money is at stake? / Powerpoint presentation / October / Yes
21 / 8/11 / State Audit and SCL response / Handouts—exec summary of report and response / Copy of report given to Panel at the 9/1/10 meeting / No / x
22 / 8/11 / Smart Grid follow-up
(a) “catch up investments vs. next generation grid investments – separate costs, benefits, timelines, by customer class
(b) AMI project—options, costs, timelines, benefits, costs. Info from other experience nationally, separate out for customer class
(c) Federal grants? / October / Yes
23 / 9/1 / SCL 2011-2012 Budget Proposal / Powerpoint/handouts / Leiber / October / Yes
24 / 9/1 / Readable slide of the technology plan investments/costs / Slide / Kinney / September 17 / no / X
Handout to be given to Panel on 09/17/10
25 / 9/1 / JD Powers Commercial Customer survey results / Powerpoint/ handout / September? October? / Yes

1