Standard: CAS #5 Develop and refine artistic techniques and work for presentation. MUPr5.1.E.8a develop strategies to address technical challenges in a varied repertoire of music and evaluate their success using feedback from ensemble peer and other sources to refine performance.

Learning Goal: I can perform with beautiful tone, clear intonation, rhythmic precision, accurate technique, and traditional interpretation.

Score
4.0 /
  • Teach it?
  • University Level
  • Apply, critique, analyze, synthesize
  • Artistic application
  • Apply concepts

/
  • I can perform with beautiful tone, clear intonation, rhythmic precision, accurate technique, and traditional interpretation.

Score
2.0 /
  • Able to classify, compare
  • Begin to succeed in 3 of 5 categories

Score
1.0 /
  • I can list 5 categories
  • Label, name, recognize, recall, recite

Score
0.0 /
  • I don’t yet understand the 5 categories

Standard: 7 Perceive and analyze artistic work.

Learning Goal: Literature Quality. Performance Quality.

Score
4.0 / I can explain to someone else the quality difference between literatures and demonstrate to others a quality performance on my instrument.
/ I can recognize the characteristics of quality literature and the skill/knowledge set required to perform it.
Score
2.0 / I can distinguish the overall concept of quality literature and performance for my specific instrument
Score
1.0 / I can recognize the basics of quality literature and recognize the sound of quality performance in a generic, ensemble format.
Score
0.0 / I have no basis of understanding toward being able to distinguish quality literature and performance.

Standard: 4 select, analyze and interpret artistic work for performance.

Learning Goal: Tone, Introduction, Technique, Rhythm, and Interpretation.

Score
4.0 / I can teach someone else this goal. I can perform these goals at a university level.
/ I can produce a characteristic tone spread over an extended range. I can match the pitch center of the ensemble. I can read at sight (duple & compound metric) rhythm and follow interpretation signs, symbols and terminology.
Score
2.0 / I can read interpretative instructions around notation.
Score
1.0 / I can produce a characteristic sound within a limited range. I can read simple one count rhythms.
Score
0.0 / I do not yet understand how to produce a tone or read notation.

Standard: MU:Pr4.1.E.8a Select a varied repertoire to study based on music reading skills an understanding of formal design in the music context and the technical skill of the individual and ensemble.

Learning Goal: I can successfully identify differentiate and perform march styles vs. theme and variation.

Score
4.0 / I can demonstrate through performance, march style as well as theme and variation. Illustrating each component with complete accuracy at “performance ready” tempo.
/ I can successfully perform at a “consecutive” tempo. I can identify and differentiate perform march style and theme and variation.
Score
2.0 / I a moderate degree of proficiency I can perform, predict and distinguish components of both concert marches and theme and variation.
Score
1.0 / I can label the components of both marches and theme and variation. I can showcase/illustrate this knowledge at a basic level through performance.
Score
0.0 / I do not yet understand the design or difference between march style and theme and variation. Showing this knowledge through performance is not possible.

Standard: MU:Pr5.1.F.Develop strategies to address technical challenges in a varied repetitive of music and evaluate their success.

Learning Goal: I can successfully interpret and evaluate the performance of myself and others using MSROA evaluation criteria: Tone, Introduction, Technique, Rhythm and Interpretation.

Score
4.0 / I can successfully critique, synthesize and apply the MSROA evaluation criteria for a superior performance for myself and others.
/ GOAL – See above
Score
2.0 / I can categorize, compare and contrast all 5 areas of evaluation and make moderate progress applying the criteria in performance.
Score
1.0 / I can define the performance expectations and evaluation criteria but struggle with personal application.
Score
0.0 / I cannot perform, understand, or recognize the expectations of a successful performance.

Standard: VA:Cr3.1.11a Engage in constructive critique with peers, then reflect on, re-engage, reuse, and refine works of art and design in response to personal artistic.

Learning Goal: I can participate, reflect, and analyze the critique process with peers, and integrate what is learned in my own work (personal artwork).

Score
4.0 / I can apply concepts learned in the critique process to create my artwork and can make connections beyond the classroom.
/ I can participate reflect, and analyze the critique process with peers, and integrate what is learned in my personal artwork.
  • Using a process to guide me
  • Feedback w/ specific evidence
  • Examples to support

Score
2.0 / I can listen, give opinions, and understand the critique process and am able to identify characteristics in others work.
  • Give opinion and provide evidence

Score
1.0 / I am beginning to give opinions and with help I can understand how to grow through critique.
Score
0.0 / I am not yet comfortable stating an opinion or identifying characteristics in artwork.