CAPITAL PROJECT GUIDELINES MANUALFORM H.32 (11/27/01)

DESIGN REVIEW RECORD

DATE:

TO:Distribution (See below)

FROM:

ref:Designer of Record:

(MNR Group or Consultant Co. Name)

Submittal for Design Development Milestone:

Partial Submittal:
Completion of Previous Partial Submittals:
Submittal of All Documents Due at this Milestone:

(Indicate which is applicable by suitable marking or “yes”)

Project No.:

/

Project Name:

Contract No:

/

Contract Title:

Task Order No (if applicable):

/

Task Order Title (if applicable):

Please review the documents listed at the end of this form. The “Response “ Section of this form must be used, as required by Capital Project Procedure. Those sending comments via marked-up documents must also return a filled-in copy of this form. Completed forms may be returned via e-mail.

Your responses must be received no later than:

Distribution of review request:

R. Ferretti
Graybar/9TH floor

(SENDER: Distribute according to the requirements of the Capital Project Procedures and the applicable Project Management Plan Design Review /Approval Matrix.)

(REVIEWER: Return all sections of the form to the Sender and all parties on initial distribution.)

CAPITAL PROJECT GUIDELINES MANUALFORM H.32 (11/27/01)

REVIEWER’S RESPONSE

DATE:

RESPONSE FROM:

(Reviewer’s name and group represented)

(Note to Reviewer: please return entire form with your comments)

As far as the requirements of the group I represent and those aspects of the documents that affect this group,

I agree with the information presented :
* No comments.
* I have minor comments that need to be incorporated in the next revision. (See next page for comments)
I do not agree with the information presented:
* Comments provided below o(or attached sheet)
* Comments in marked-up documents separately forwarded
Opinion Regarding Application of Station Standards
* Station Standards were duly applied in those areas pertinent to the group I represent
* Station Standards were adequately considered in the development of the design, except in the areas identified by the Designer as exceptions. I AGREE with the exceptions taken, based on the reasons provided.
* Stations Standards were adequately considered in the development of the design, except in the areas identified by the Designer as exceptions. I AGREE with the exceptions taken, based on the reasons provided. However, I DO NOT AGREE WITH THE LIST OF EXCEPTIONS, which did not include a number of exceptions to the Station Standards. Opinion reflected in ‘I do not agree with…” section above.
* Station Standards were not adequately applied or duly considered in the development of the design. Opinion reflected in ‘I agree with…” section above.

Instructions for Reviewers:

Mark in only one applicable entry from either “I agree..” or “I do not agree…”

  • Mark in also an applicable entry for “Opinion Regarding Application of Station Standards>”
List of Documents
Document Ref. ID No. / Document Rev. / Document Date / DOCUMENT TITLE / REVIEWER’S STATUS
(i.e. – Accept, Accept With Comments and Resubmit Final, Reject)

1 OF 2