JUNE 9, 2017
Islam is not a religion
But it is helpful to the Institutional Left in its war against the Catholic Church
June 9, 2017
07:02
TRANSCRIPT
Every time some crazed Muslim attacks a crowd, slashes a throat, blows up people, drives over scores of pedestrians, shoots civilians or murders and maims in whatever fashion, the first thing you hear from the institutional Left is, "What a tragedy. Now, let's be careful to not let this turn into another case for Islamophobia."
There are a number of things going on here with tolerating this kind of chaos, preaching at the victims not to become jaded and flipping out at any leader who says the word "Islam" when talking about this whole mess. You must understand that the institutional Left has the Catholic Church as its number one enemy because the Catholic Church preaches against sexual immorality. And sexual immorality and its resulting abortions in millions of cases are worshipped by the Left.
They want to have sex with whoever they want, whenever they want and they want their consciences absolved from the guilty, which occurs to them because they know, down deep, they are violating the natural law. But instead of changing their lives, they want the Church to condone their evil. While many weak, evil or cowardly bishops and clergy do just that, the Church will never — and that just galls them, enrages them — that the Church will never change the teachings. By just the sheer presence of Her divine teachings, the Church convicts them, and their rage is diabolical in response.
Anything can be tolerated except the moral teachings of the Church. The teachings have to go, which means the Church has to go, which means the civilization which the Church built and sustained for more than a thousand years has to go. So, quite a while back, immoral men set out on a campaign to destroy the Catholic Church by undermining Her civilization. Through revolutions and the enshrinement of fake freedoms disconnected from their divine origin, little by little they were able to advance their anti-Christ philosophies.
As the decades progressed, their efforts picked up steam and are advancing rapidly. One of their major weapons in the past couple of generations has been the idea of multiculturalism. The institutional Left has hammered at this idea non-stop, so that the West's civilization built by the Catholic Church could be, first, watered-down and, then, completely over run.
This is why the Left tolerates Islamic maniacs running around killing people. The first thing they always do in response is preach against any racism or religious discrimination in response. Heck, they sometimes even blame the victims, saying they are responsible for not being welcoming enough or not integrating Muslims enough.
The Left went bananas over the so-called travel ban because it was just one more example of a spotlight on the clash between civilizations — Islam and Catholicism. The Left may be insane but they aren’t stupid. They know Islam is a not really a religion as much as it is fundamentally a form of government as Cdl. Raymond Burke has called it. Objectively speaking, Islam is not a religion. Islam wants to govern the world His Eminence says, and he's spot on.
It is a geopolitical force that has various religious elements to it. It was started by a murderer and it was advanced after his death by a group of his followers who were also murderers. If it is a religion, in any true sense of that term, then it must be said it is a religion that condones murder. Call it like it is. Does that mean every Muslim is a murderer? Of course not. But does it mean that many of the leaders are — and have historically been — in favor of slaughter to get their governmental system advanced? Ask yourself how Catholic North Africa became Muslim North Africa in just a few short years. The answer will be a familiar one — through beheading. It was going on 1,400 years ago and has never really ceased.
But none of this mayhem means anything to the Left. The Catholic Church needs to be wiped out and Islam is just another weapon in the arsenal. It's why Obama was so friendly to Islam. He wouldn't even use the term "radical Islamic terrorism." And neither would any of the Leftist media.
To use a term like that brings to the front of people's minds that there are different cultures and civilizations, and they aren't all equal. That thought, once grasped, immediately raises the question of one civilization being better or superior to another. And when that questions arises — then people start thinking and examining the objective matter and say, "Hmmmm" — this civilization is better than this one. Now, why is that? And the answer to that question leads them straight back to the Catholic Church.
Islam, as a civilization, has advanced itself through mass murder and subjection of races and nations. Many of its adherents have employed Islam's unsettled and disputed religious writings as a tool to commit murder and conquest. But none of this matters to the Left. They couldn't give a rip about murderous Muslims as long as all this plays into their larger scheme of promoting multiculturalism.
Whoever heard of someone being attacked and someone else jumping in and telling the victim, now the most important thing here is to not think badly of your attacker? But the Left will preach any insanity to ensure that their mirage of multi-culturalism is never shattered. Multiculturalism must be defended — no matter the cost. It doesn't matter who is murdered. It doesn't matter how much information the Leftist media has to prevent you from hearing. All that matters is the defeat of the Catholic Church, and its moral teaching.
Guilt is a powerful, powerful motivator. And the Left has it in spades. How can they not be guilty about the world they have created — hundreds of millions of murdered babies, tens of millions of shattered families, destroyed economic systems. There is no end to the carnage of the Left, and they will keep destroying until there is nothing left to destroy.
That's why the Left is diabolical and that's why the Church must be destroyed, because, ultimately, the Left has Satan as its founder.
Readers have left 193 comments
1. This Vortex explains why in the world the Dems are so supportive to Islam? As an American, I always wonder why in the world the left want those ISIS come into our country. Don't the leftist Americans want safety of America? But when I realize their ultimate goal is to destroy the Catholic Church and the morality the Church holds, I can see the link and understand why in the world those left Dems want Islam in the United States so bad. They are determined to destroy the Catholic Church. That is their burning desire.
Would true Catholics be determined to defend the Church? The honest answer you give probably help you realize if you are an authentic Catholic or a CINO.
2. Islam has bloody borders – it always has been a source of death and sorrow to all those living next to it, grinding its way across the middle east, attacking Christendom until only a tattered remnant is left in the region where Christ walked and preached. It’s been a military conquest masquerading as a religion since the 7th century, and nothing has changed today.
Saint John Bosco said it best:
“It would take too long to tell you all the stories about this famous impostor…Mohamed’s religion consists of a monstrous mixture of Judaism, Paganism and Christianity.
Mohamed propagated his religion, not through miracles or persuasive words, but through the force of arms. It is a religion that favors every sort of licentiousness and which, in a short time, allowed Mohamed to become the leader of a troop of brigands.
Along with them he raided the countries of the East and conquered the people, not by introducing the Truth, not by miracles or prophecy; but for one reason only: to raise his sword over the heads of the conquered shouting: believe or die.”
3.The Bishops are involved in this. Here in my area they take trips to the local mosque(and pay to do it). They celebrate the end of Ramadan in Catholic high schools with a meal together. All of this in Catholic schools...
I tried to get stopped. I was not successful in stopping it, they just moved the end of Ramadan meal from the Catholic High school to the local Catholic community center. For those who do not know Ramadan is like(unlike) our Lent and Easter, in its significance to Islam, that is. It is about the pieces of silver the Bishops have taken they owe it to the Muslims who have given money to them. Cardinal Dolan even went to the local mosque and told them they were going to heaven. Yup, it’s on video and he told them to stay in their faith too. Seems he doesn't know much about his faith either now does he or was it the pieces of silver?
4. I want to urge you to stop using the world "Muslim/Moslem" and start using "Mohammedan" instead. And to stop using "Islam" and use "Mohammedanism" - as Westerners did until recently.
If you knew what they means by Muslim you would stop using that term. Wake up, Westerners!
(The rest below is adapted from a forum post I made elsewhere a few days ago, debating Mohammedans who objected vehemently to my use of that word.)
[Note that Mohammedans say that calling them thus is insulting and derogatory because it means they worship Mohammed as Christians worship Christ, which for them is shirk, a horror.]
Apart from the baloney “Mohammedanism” means “worshippers of Mohammed” nonsense almost universally retailed these days, there are other and stronger reasons why I choose to use “mohammedan” and not “moslem”. (My wife is Freudian but doesn’t worship Freud, a friend is a Confucian but doesn’t worship Confucius, another is a Malaysian but doesn’t worship Malaya. These meanings are obvious to most people with a smattering of education.)
There’s a subtle but very important word-game being played by apologists and supporters of the Mohammedan religion that most Westerners are utterly unaware of because they do not know Arabic or bother to read or listen to Mohammedan apologists.
Let's first look at the etymology of the word "muslim":
Wikipedia has a pretty reasonable and factual summary, one that no follower of that religion can quibble with: "The word muslim (Arabic: مسلم, IPA: [ˈmʊslɪm]; English /ˈmʌzlᵻm/, /ˈmʊzlᵻm/, /ˈmʊslᵻm/ or moslem /ˈmɒzləm/, /ˈmɒsləm/ [25]) is the active participle of the same verb of which islām is a verbal noun, based on the triliteral S-L-M "to be whole, intact”.
None of this is controversial – until you realise exactly how the apologists of that religion deploy the trilateral “slm” in their theology and apologetics.
Now as you know, in the modern West there are many ways in which we use and understand the phrase “to be whole/intact”. Most of these meanings also obtain in Arabic and in Mohammedan apologetics, and are not immediately controversial.
That is why Mohammedan scholars have for centuries used the word “moslem” (or “muslim”, same thing) to describe and denote pretty much anything that occurs naturally or which is uncorrupted by error.
Hence Islamic scholars say that the motion of the planets and stars is moslem, that gravity and the laws of chemistry are moslem, and so on. They mean by this that these entities and their motions and laws are all in their intact and natural pristine state as created by Allah and have not been corrupted by any creature (man or demon).
This is why every notable Islamic scholar over the nearly fourteen centuries since Mohammed’s religion was spread has said that children are born moslem, and that Noah, Abraham, Jesus and others are moslem – they mean thereby that their actions are “intact” and “according to the laws as Allah created them and all nature”.
In others words, for these people “moslem” is pretty much a synonym for “in conformance with the laws of reality / nature / truth / God”.
So, when a Mohammedan tells you that children are naturally born moslem, you cannot really disagree if you understand that word in its narrow etymological and strictly philological sense.
The problem comes in when they mix into that strict semantic sense other meanings that are not necessarily part of “natural / whole / intact / according to the laws of God”. These additional meanings they regard as fundamentally, intrinsically and inseparably part of how they use the term “moslem”.
So, when a Mohammedan says he is a moslem, from one side of his mouth he is saying “I am whole / intact / in conformance with the laws of reality and truth i.e. Allah”. But he is also necessarily meaning that to conform to the laws of reality intrinsically entails accepting Mohammed and his teachings.
In other words, the Mohammedan is saying that those who do not accept Mohammed as God’s definitive and final revelation do not therefore believe (understand) or live according to the laws of reality and truth, i.e. they are not conforming their beliefs and lives according to the laws of truth / reality / the universe, i.e. these non-moslems, to the extent they do not believe and live as Mohammed taught, are being unnatural, disintegrated, contaminated, destructive of true order and nature.
This is both a semantic and a logical sleight of hand. And I reject it out of hand.
In the narrow etymological sense of the Arabic, as a Christian I am moslem. However, whilst I utterly submit myself to the will of God and his truth, I utterly reject what I regard as the false and corrupting teachings of Mohammed.
We Westerners have a much more developed and subtle understanding of the terms “whole/intact/natural”. We can fully embrace the strictly etymological and pre-islamic Arabic sense of “moslem” (whole/intact/etc.)
But we -- and I most certainly -- reject wholly the Mohammedan attempt to add in the sense that being whole/intact necessarily and definitionally includes accepting Mohammed and his teachings.
This is both a semantic and a logical sleight of hand. I reject it out of hand. And urge all Christians to do with same.
5.Here is the leftist protocol each time there is an Islamic terror event:
1. Don't use the words Islam to describe the attackers even when they self-identify
2. Insult the public by telling them "not all Muslims are terrorists (a defense they would never apply for Catholic priests and the abuse issue)
3. Give us the religious relativism garbage (all religions are capable of violence)
4. Worry about Islamophobia instead of focusing on the victims and the root causes
5. Blame the west (we don't really understand their culture)
6. Hold vigils and hold hands - hug a thug
7. Show the handful of Muslims who have spoken out as though that makes everything ok
8. Light up buildings with cheesy peace signs and hearts
9. Facebook filters
10. Tearful cartoons
11. Crying on TV
12. Call anyone who argues against refugees’ policies a bigot
13. Bring in more refugees
14. Wait for the next attack
6.Muslims, they're never happy
They're not happy in Gaza ...
They're not happy in Egypt ...
They're not happy in Libya ...
They're not happy in Morocco ...
They're not happy in Iran ...
They're not happy in Iraq ...
They're not happy in Yemen ...
They're not happy in Afghanistan ...
They're not happy in Pakistan ...
They're not happy in Syria ...
They're not happy in Lebanon ...
SO, WHERE ARE THEY HAPPY?
They're happy in Australia ...
They're happy in Canada ...
They're happy in New Zealand ...
They're happy in France ...
They're happy in Italy ....
They're happy in Germany ...
They're happy in Sweden ...
They're happy in the USA ...
They're happy in Norway ...
They're happy in Holland ...
They're happy in Denmark ...
Basically, they're happy in every country that is not Muslim and unhappy in every country that is!
AND WHO DO THEY BLAME?
Not Islam. Not their leadership. Not themselves.
THEY BLAME THE COUNTRIES THEY ARE HAPPY IN! And then, they want to change those countries to be like . . . . THE COUNTRY THEY CAME FROM WHERE THEY WERE UNHAPPY!
Excuse me, but I can't help wondering . . . How dumb can you get? Everyone seems to be wondering why Muslim Terrorists are so quick to commit suicide. Let's have a look at the evidence:
- No Christmas
- No television
- No football
- No pork chops
- No hot dogs
- No burgers
- No beer
- No bacon
- Rags for clothes
- Towels for hats
- Constant wailing from some idiot in a tower
- More than one wife
- More than one mother in law ( that alone is enough )
- You can't shave
- Your wife can't shave
- You can't wash off the smell of donkey
- You cook over burning camel dung
- Your wife is picked by someone else for you
- and your wife smells worse than your donkey