Vote on new work item proposal/ Return forms to:
Fax: +1 202 962 4797
VOTE ON NEW WORK ITEM PROPOSALDate of circulation
2006-02-21 / Reference number
ISO/TC 67 / SC 4N 337
Closing date for voting
Member body voting
ISO/TC 67 / SC 4
Drilling and production equipment / Circulated to P-members of the committee for vote and to O members for information.
P-members of the technical committee or subcommittee concerned have an obligation to vote.
Secretariat / ANSI
Please send this form, duly completed at all points, to the Secretariat indicated above (not to ISO Central Secretariat).
P-members voting "Abstain" need only complete Question 2.1. All other P-members need to respond to all questions.
Important Note: Incomplete forms may be considered invalid and not be counted when assessing results.
English title / Petroleum and natural gas industries - Downhole equipment - Packers and bridge plugs (revision of ISO 14310:2001)
1.1Justification of proposal
(P-members intending to vote 'We abstain' should not respond to this question but should proceed to Question 2)
Do you agree, as the voting member body, that the requirements in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 1, 2004, Annex C on the Justification of proposals for the establishment of standards have been met by this proposal?
1.2 SVAT analysis (see annex)
NOTE: SVAT is a tool to help determine the market relevance of the new work item proposal and hence the voting decision of P-member. Provision of a completed SVAT analysis is therefore obligatory except if abstaining
We have completed a SVAT analysis, and:
consider that there is no impediment to the preparation of market relevant and globally relevant International Standards
believe that there is an impediment to the preparation of market relevant and globally relevant International Standards
If there is any impediment , please indicate clearly what such impediment is below or as annex
2Vote(Response required from all P-members)
(P-members intending to vote 'We abstain' need only respond to 2.1)
2.1We agree that a globally relevant International Standard on this subject is feasible and therefore agree to the addition of the proposed new work item to the programme of work of the committee:
Yes* No We abstain / have no interest
2.2We are prepared to participate actively in the development of the project (even if voting "No"), i.e. to make an effective contribution at the preparatory stage, at least by commenting on working drafts:
NOTE 1All P-members voting "Yes" to questions 2.1 and 2.2 need to nominate an expert.
NOTE 2P-members voting "No" to question 2.1 may nevertheless nominate experts.
* Name(s) and address(es) of nominated expert(s)
2.3 Additional vote on an associated draft
NOTEQuestion 2.3 is applicable only in those cases where an additional vote for adoption of a draft is indicated by the committee secretariat on the ISO Form 4 in the section "Voting information". In such cases, answer either 2.3.1 or 2.3.2, as indicated on the New work item proposal.
2.3.1Do you agree to progression of the draft associated with the new work item proposal as a CD:
2.3.2Do you agree to direct submission of the draft associated with the new work item proposal as a DIS:
If voting 'No" on question 2.3.2, i.e. to the progression of the draft associated with the new work item proposal to a DIS, would you nevertheless agree with progression of the draft as a CD:
Standard(s), regulation(s), and other relevant documentation existing in our country, with any remarks concerning their application if necessary and consequences for global relevance, are attached:
If "Yes", please give references here, or as a separate annex:
An annex is attached to this formMember body voting
Date / Name
Annex A to Form 5 – SVAT analysis from P-member
It is expected that a positive vote is supported by a comparative SVAT score of greater than 15Evaluation of market relevance of the proposal
It is recommended that this evaluation be carried out by a reasonably large number of stakeholders and the average of the various points given be subsequently reflected on the voting forms.)
low / high
1 / 2 / 3 / 4 / 5
A.1What is the potential of this project to contribute to international trade and production?
A.2What is the potential of this project to contribute to economic efficiency, health, safety, or the environment?
A.3How great is the need to harmonize national approaches in this subject area that may serve as barriers to international trade?
A.4*What is the feasibility of achieving consensus on International Standard(s) in this subject area by the proposed target dates?
A.5*What priority should be assigned to the development of International Standard(s) in this subject area?
(Comments, including proposals for modification of the scope, may be annexed. Please also comment if you believe this proposal as written may lead to an International Standard reflecting regional/national approaches and practices rather than international practice) / Total points
A4*: When evaluation is 1 or 2, indicate the impedents in Question 1.2
A5*: When evaluation is 1 or 2, indicate the other project of higher priority in Question 1.2
FORM 5 (ISO) v.2005.1Page 1 of 3