Ballot Form for NP to Revise ISO 14310:2001, P&Ngi - Downhole Equipment - Packers and Bridge

Vote on new work item proposal

VOTE ON NEW WORK ITEM PROPOSAL

Please send this form, duly completed at all points, to the Secretariat indicated above (not to ISO Central Secretariat).

P-members voting "Abstain" need only complete Question 2.1. All other P-members need to respond to all questions.

Important Note: Incomplete forms may be considered invalid and not be counted when assessing results.

1 Analyses

1.1Justification of proposal
(P-members intending to vote 'We abstain' should not respond to this question but should proceed to Question 2)

Do you agree, as the voting member body, that the requirements in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 1, 2004, Annex C on the Justification of proposals for the establishment of standards have been met by this proposal?

Yes No

1.2 SVAT analysis (see annex)

NOTE: SVAT is a tool to help determine the market relevance of the new work item proposal and hence the voting decision of P-member. Provision of a completed SVAT analysis is therefore obligatory except if abstaining

We have completed a SVAT analysis, and:

consider that there is no impediment to the preparation of market relevant and globally relevant International Standards

believe that there is an impediment to the preparation of market relevant and globally relevant International Standards

If there is any impediment , please indicate clearly what such impediment is below or as annex

2Vote(Response required from all P-members)
(P-members intending to vote 'We abstain' need only respond to 2.1)

2.1We agree that a globally relevant International Standard on this subject is feasible and therefore agree to the addition of the proposed new work item to the programme of work of the committee:

Yes* No We abstain / have no interest

* Justification

2.2We are prepared to participate actively in the development of the project (even if voting "No"), i.e. to make an effective contribution at the preparatory stage, at least by commenting on working drafts:

Yes* No

NOTE 1All P-members voting "Yes" to questions 2.1 and 2.2 need to nominate an expert.

NOTE 2P-members voting "No" to question 2.1 may nevertheless nominate experts.

* Name(s) and address(es) of nominated expert(s)

2.3 Additional vote on an associated draft

NOTEQuestion 2.3 is applicable only in those cases where an additional vote for adoption of a draft is indicated by the committee secretariat on the ISO Form 4 in the section "Voting information". In such cases, answer either 2.3.1 or 2.3.2, as indicated on the New work item proposal.

2.3.1Do you agree to progression of the draft associated with the new work item proposal as a CD:

Yes No

2.3.2Do you agree to direct submission of the draft associated with the new work item proposal as a DIS:

Yes No

If voting 'No" on question 2.3.2, i.e. to the progression of the draft associated with the new work item proposal to a DIS, would you nevertheless agree with progression of the draft as a CD:

Yes No

3Relevant documents

Standard(s), regulation(s), and other relevant documentation existing in our country, with any remarks concerning their application if necessary and consequences for global relevance, are attached:

Yes No

If "Yes", please give references here, or as a separate annex:

4Comments

An annex is attached to this form

Annex A to Form 5 – SVAT analysis from P-member

It is expected that a positive vote is supported by a comparative SVAT score of greater than 15

A4*: When evaluation is 1 or 2, indicate the impedents in Question 1.2

A5*: When evaluation is 1 or 2, indicate the other project of higher priority in Question 1.2

FORM 5 (ISO) v.2005.1Page 1 of 3