Athena SWAN HR DATA Example

  1. Female:male ratio of academic staff and research staff– researcher, lecturer, senior lecturer, reader, professor (or equivalent). comment on any differences in numbers between males and females and say what action is being taken to address any underrepresentation at particular grades/levels

2010/11 / 2011/12 / 2012/13
Female / Male / Female / Male / Female / Male
Professor / 4 / 1 / 5 / 1 / 2 / 1
Reader / 2 / 0 / 1 / 0 / 2 / 0
Senior Lecturer / 3 / 1 / 5 / 1 / 5 / 1
Lecturer / 4 / 0 / 4 / 0 / 7 / 0
Senior Tutor / 14 / 1 / 16 / 1 / 17 / 2
Tutor / 35 / 8 / 34 / 9 / 40 / 6
Researchers / 9 / 0 / 5 / 1 / 4 / 1
Total / 71 / 11 / 70 / 13 / 77 / 11
  1. Turnover by grade and gender– comment on any differences between men and women in turnover and say what is being done to address this. Where the number of staff leaving is small, comment on the reasons why particular individuals left.

2010/11 / 2011/12 / 2012/13
Female / Male / Female / Male / Female / Male
Job level left
Professor / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 1
Reader / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0
Senior Lecturer / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 1
Lecturer / 0 / 0 / 0 / 1 / 1 / 0
Senior Tutor / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0
Tutor / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0
Researchers / 4 / 4 / 10 / 3 / 8 / 3
Total / 6 / 4 / 10 / 4 / 9 / 5
Reasons for Leaving
Resignation / 4 / 0 / 5 / 2 / 1 / 3
End of Temp Contract / 1 / 4 / 5 / 2 / 7 / 1
Restructuring / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0
Retirement / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0
Other / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 1 / 1
  1. Job application and success rates by gender and grade – comment on any differences in recruitment between men and women at any level and say what action is being taken to address this.

2010/11 / 2011/12 / 2012/13
Applications / Recruited / Applications / Recruited / Applications / Recruited
Professor / Male / 2 / 1 / 2 / 1 / 3 / 2
Female / 0 / 0 / 1 / 0 / 1 / 1
Reader / Male / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 1 / 1
Female / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 1 / 0
Senior Lecturer / Male / 3 / 3 / 2 / 2 / 4 / 2
Female / 4 / 1 / 1 / 0 / 3 / 1
Lecturer / Male / 2 / 2 / 3 / 1 / 2 / 1
Female / 6 / 1 / 1 / 0 / 1 / 0
Senior Tutor / Male / 4 / 3 / 3 / 3 / 2 / 1
Female / 3 / 1 / 2 / 0 / 1 / 0
Tutor / Male / 3 / 1 / 4 / 3 / 2 / 2
Female / 12 / 10 / 8 / 7 / 5 / 3
Researchers / Male / 5 / 4 / 6 / 3 / 0 / 4
Female / 9 / 7 / 8 / 5 / 7 / 4
Total / 55 / 34 / 41 / 25 / 33 / 22
  1. Applications for promotion and success rates by gender and grade – comment on whether these differ for men and women and if they do explain what action may be taken. Where the number of women is small applicants may comment on specific examples of where women have been through the promotion process. Explain how potential candidates are identified.

2010/11 / 2011/12 / 2012/13
Applications / Promoted / Applications / Promoted / Applications / Promoted
Professor / Male / 2 / 2 / 2 / 1 / 1 / 0
Female / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0
Reader / Male / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 1 / 1
Female / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0
Senior Lecturer / Male / 0 / 0 / 3 / 1 / 1 / 1
Female / 1 / 0 / 1 / 0 / 2 / 1
Lecturer / Male / 2 / 2 / 0 / 0 / 1 / 1
Female / 1 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 1 / 0
Senior Tutor / Male / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0
Female / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0
Tutor / Male / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0 / 0
Female / 0 / 0 / 3 / 0 / 3 / 1
Researchers / Male / 1 / 1 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0
Female / 0 / 0 / 1 / 0 / 0 / 0
Total / 55 / 34 / 41 / 25 / 33 / 22
  1. Male and female representation on committees – provide a breakdown by committee and explain any differences between male and female representation. Explain how potential members are identified.

2010/11 / 2011/12 / 2012/13
Female / Male / Female / Male / Female / Male
Faculty Executive Board / 7 (64%) / 4 (36%) / 8 (67%) / 4 (33%) / 7 (50%) / 7 (50%)
Faculty Research Committee / 5 (36%) / 9 (64%) / 5 (33%) / 10 (67%) / 7 (44%) / 9 (56%)
Faculty Learning & Teaching Committee / 12 (80%) / 3 (20%) / 16 (89%) / 2 (11%) / 16 (80%) / 4 (20%)
Graduate School Committee / n/a / n/a / n/a / n/a / 6 (67%) / 3 (33%)
Faculty International Relations Committee / - / - / 8 (66%) / 4 (33%) / 8 (47%) / 9 (53%
  1. Female:male ratio of academic and research staff on fixed-term contracts and open-ended (permanent) contracts – comment on any differences between male and female staff representation on fixed-term contracts and say what is being done to address them.

2010/11 / 2011/12 / 2012/13
Female / Permanent / 12 / 17 / 9
Male / Fixed Term / 11 / 8 / 4
Female / Permanent / 32 / 40 / 8
Male / Fixed Term / 12 / 9 / 2
  1. Maternity return rate – comment on whether maternity return rate in the department has improved or deteriorated and any plans for further improvement. If the department is unable to provide a maternity return rate, please explain why.

Academic and Research Staff / 2011 / 2012 / 2013
Total number who took maternity leave / 1 Lecturer / 1 Tutor / 1 Tutor
Number who returned to work / 1 / 1 / 1
Number who returned to work full time / n/a / 0 / 1
Number who returned to work part time / 1 / 1 / 0
Number still in work 6 months later / 1 / 1 / 1
Number still in work 12 months later / 1 / 1 / n/a
No. of KIT days used / 10 / 0 / 3
  1. Paternity, adoption and parental leave uptake – comment on the uptake of paternity leave by grade and parental and adoption leave by gender and grade. Has this improved or deteriorated and what plans are there to improve further.

2010/11 / 2011/12 / 2012/13
Female / 2 / 4 / 2
Male / 1 / 1 / 1
Total / 3 / 5 / 3
  1. Numbers of applications and success rates for flexible working by gender and grade – comment on any disparities. Where the number of women in the department is small applicants may wish to comment on specific examples.

2010/11 / 2011/12 / 2012/13
Female / 2 / 4 / 2
Male / 1 / 1 / 1
Total / 3 / 5 / 3