SAS Core Curriculum Assessment Report / Date: / ______
Course Number & Name: / ____201_Introduction to Logic______
Instructor(s): / ______
Semester / ______/ Enrollment / ______

Assessment Tool:[ x ] CRC’s Generic Rubric(s)[ ] Other: ______

Please attach syllabus, and if “Other” selected, please attach assessment instrument

Prompt [question or assignment resulting in the student work product that was assessed]:

Core Curriculum Goal(s) being Assessed: ____x______

Please indicate the total number assessed and the raw number scoring in each cell: PLEASE DO NOT USE PERCENTAGES. Detailed descriptors for each cell are included in the full rubrics.

x. Apply effective and efficient mathematical or other formal processes to reason and to solve problems.
Criteria from Core generic rubrics / NO. OF
STUDENTS ASSESSED / OUTSTANDING / GOOD / SATISFACTORY / UNSATISFACTORY
(D/F)
Summary Assessment Of Goal
Symbolization: The ability to convert a problem into a setting using symbolic terminology / Is able to convert complex problems/sentences into appropriate symbolization with full mastery and understanding / Is able to convert complex problems/sentences into appropriate symbolization with adequate understanding / Fails to identify an important variable in the problem; is inconsistent in the use of symbolic terminology or notation / Fails to identify any important variables in the problem; uses incorrect symbolic representations; consistently uses symbolic terminology incorrectly.
Analysis: The ability to carry out logical procedures to resolution / uses creative methods leading to an elegant solution; carries out a logical sequence of procedures; uses symbolic operational rules correctly and with understanding / minor computational errors but the procedures used lead to the correct solution / Major/basic logical errors, but the operational procedures lead to a partially correct solution or to a solution that is correct in parts / uses inappropriate method of solution or fails to follow procedure to completion; makes serious logical errors
Interpretation: The ability to draw valid conclusions from symbolic evidence / Draws well-stated and well-justified conclusions from the symbolic solution; demonstrates insight in expressing the meaning of the symbolic solution / Draws clear and reasonably-justified conclusions from the symbolic solution; clearly expresses the meaning of the symbolic solution / Draws poorly stated and invalid conclusions from the symbolic solution; attempts to express the meaning of the symbolic solution are weak / Draws poorly stated and invalid conclusions; does not grasp the meaning of the symbolic solution

If only a sample was selected for scoring, please explain fully how the sample was chosen.

If more than one person scored each work product, please indicate the number of scorers: ______

Report prepared and submitted by: ______

Plans for modification in light of results, if any: