APEC EINet:

Emerging Infectious Diseases After Natural Disasters

Thursday, 02 December 2010 at 02:00-04:00 Coordinated Universal Time (UTC)

Friday, 03 December 2010 (Asia)

Evaluation Form

Economy: ______

Please list the name, title and email of each participant from your economy below:

Please highlight the appropriate answer.

  1. Were you a:
  2. Participant presenting a case study
  3. Participant not presenting a case study
  1. Approximately how many people were there observing the event at your site?

______persons (please provide an estimated number)

  1. Please rate your overall experience of the Hot Topics videoconference.
  2. Excellent
  3. Very good
  4. Good
  5. Fair
  6. Poor
  1. The Hot Topics videoconference was effective in promoting regional information sharing on emerging infectious diseases after natural disasters.
  2. Strongly agree
  3. Agree
  4. Disagree
  5. Strongly disagree

  1. The Hot Topics videoconference was efficient in promoting regional information sharing on emerging infections preparedness.
  2. Strongly agree
  3. Agree
  4. Disagree
  5. Strongly disagree
  1. The Hot Topics videoconference promoted future collaboration to enhance regional preparedness.
  2. Strongly agree
  3. Agree
  4. Disagree
  5. Strongly disagree
  1. The Hot Topics videoconference was well organized prior to the event.
  2. Strongly agree
  3. Agree
  4. Disagree
  5. Strongly disagree
  1. The Hot Topics videoconference was well organized during the event.
  2. Strongly agree
  3. Agree
  4. Disagree
  5. Strongly disagree
  1. There was clear communication from APEC EINet regarding the Hot Topics videoconference.
  2. Strongly agree
  3. Agree
  4. Disagree
  5. Strongly disagree
  1. There was clear communication between the public health community and the technology community regarding the Hot Topics videoconference.
  2. Strongly agree
  3. Agree
  4. Disagree
  5. Strongly disagree
  1. Please rate the quality of the case studies presented and shared at this Hot Topics videoconference.
  2. Excellent
  3. Very good
  4. Good
  5. Fair
  6. Poor
  1. The content of the case study presentations was:
  2. Too in depth
  3. About right
  4. Too general
  1. Please rate the technical quality of this Hot Topics videoconference (e.g. audio, visual).
  2. Excellent
  3. Very good
  4. Good
  5. Fair
  6. Poor
  1. The length of the Hot Topics videoconference was:
  2. Too short
  3. About right
  4. Too long
  1. What did you like about the Hot Topics videoconference?
  1. What did you dislike about the Hot Topics videoconference?
  1. Do you have any suggestions for improving future Hot Topics videoconference sessions?
  1. Would you be willing to participate in another Hot Topics videoconference in the future?
  1. Other comments and/or recommendations.

Thank you for completing the survey!

Questions or concerns? Email:

APEC Emerging Infections Network (EINet):