Annex № 1 (to question 1 of the List of issues)
Information on individual cases examined by the courts of the Russian Federation and related to the application of the provisions of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, 1966.
The decision of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation dated March 13, 2017 with regard to the case № АКПИ 17-31 declared invalid the clause 42.1 of Appendix No. 3 to the Federal Aviation Regulations "Medical Examination of Aviation Staff, Control Staff, Flight Attendants, Cadets and Candidates Entering Civil Aviation Institutions", approved by the Order of the Ministry of Transport of the Russian Federation № 50 on April 22, 2002, withregard torecognizing flight attendants ineligible for work when diagnosed withAIDS and HIV, except in cases when there is a medical report declaring that they are not able to perform their professional duties for health reasons.
The Supreme Court of the Russian Federation in its decision used provisions including of Article 2, paragraph 2, of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, which prohibits discrimination in the interpretation of the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. The decision of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation noted the following.
"Article 2, paragraph 2, of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights obliges States to guarantee that the rights enunciated in the Covenant will be exercised without discrimination of any kind as to race, color, sex, language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin, property, birth or other status, to which the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights (the body supervising the observance of the Covenant) attributes health status, in particular HIV status”.
Tenishchev N.M., the legal representative of the minor Bondar A.N., took legal action in order to move Bondar A.N. into the apartment located at: Moscow, 2 Onegskaya street, apt.39, and to oblige the defendant Uskov D.M. to give the apartment’s keys and not to interfere with the use of this apartment. In support of the claim, he stated that the minor Bondar A.N. was registered and previously lived in thisapartment. After the death of Bondar I.M. (A.N.Bondar's mother), the defendant took the apartment’s keys. The apartment was currently leased out by the defendant.
Defendant Uskov D.M. did not admit the claim and appealed to the court with counterclaims to recognize that the minor Bondar A.N. lost the right to use the disputed apartment motivating his demands by the fact that Bondar A.N. did not live in the place of registration more than 6 years, he left it voluntarily and at present he resided in the apartment of his father Tenishchev N.M.
The decision of the Golovinskiy District Court of Moscow on April 9, 2014 rejected the initial and counter claims.The appellate ruling of the Judicial Board for Civil Cases of Moscow City Court dated June 16, 2014, upheld the court's decision.
The Judicial Board for Civil Cases of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation revoked the decision of the Golovinskiy District Court of Moscow and the appellate ruling of the Judicial Board for Civil Cases of Moscow City Court regarding the refusal to satisfy the claims of Tenishchev N.M. to Uskov D.M. regarding moving in of Bondar A.N., obligation not to interfere with the use of the apartment, transfer of apartment’s keys, and sent the case with regard to this partfor a new trial to the court of the first instance, and in order to support its position the Judicial Board referred to the provisions of Article 11 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights. In particular, the following was noted.
"The right to housing enshrined in part 1 of Article 40 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation is one of the elements of the right to an adequate standard of living (Article 25 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 11 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights), therefore, legal regulation of relations regarding possession, use and disposal of housing facilities should provide each person with state protection including judiciary, guaranteed by part 1 of Article 45 and Article 46 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation, and it should be full and effective".
LyubovAlekseevnaAfanasyeva filed a lawsuit against the Federal State Institution "Military unit No. 25623" and the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation to recover compensation for moral harm.
In support of her claim, the petitioner referred to the fact that her son, AfanasyevVasilyVasilievich, who served in the military unit No. 63931 as a driver of a motor company (troop), on December 13, 2011, while performing his military service duties, committed a suicide as a result of a complex psycho-traumatic, stressful situation appeared due to unsatisfactory conditions of service.
The decision of the Engelskiy district court of Saratov Region dated
January 21, 2014, granted the claims in part. The court recovered from the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation at the expense of the Federal budget in favor of Afanasyeva L.A. a compensation for moral harm in the amount of RUB 50,000; RUB 10,000 - expenses for services of representation; RUB 200 – expensesfor power of attorney and RUB 150– expensesfor photocopying documents.
The appellate ruling of the Judicial Board for Civil Cases of Saratov Regional Court dated July 15, 2014 revoked the decision of the court of the first instance. The court examined the case according to the rules of procedure in the court of the first instance, and the court of appeal issued a new ruling and refused to satisfy the claims of Afanasyeva L.A.
The Judicial Board for Civil Cases of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation revoked the appellate ruling of the Judicial Board for Civil Cases of Saratov Regional Court and sent the case for a new trial to the appellate court, referred to the provisions of Article 11 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.
In the cassational ruling of the Chamber of Civil Cases of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation dated March 23, 2015 with regard to the case
32-КГ14-20 paid attention to the following.
"The arguments of the cassational petition of Afanasyeva L.A. regarding compensation for moral harm collected in her favor by the court of first instance are worth looking at. As suggested by Afanasyeva L.A., the court significantly understated the amount of compensation for moral harm, it did not fully take into account the actual facts of the case, the degree of moral suffering caused by the death of her only child and irreplaceable loss of a loved one.
The court of appeal did not consider L.A. Afanasyeva’s disagreement with the amount of compensation for moral harm collected by the court of the first instance in her favor due to improper application of substantive law governing disputed relations between the parties. However, the court of appeal did not take into account that life and health are among the most important human values, and their protection should be a priority (Article 3 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and Article 11 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights). The citizen's right to compensation for harm caused to life or health is one of the universally recognized fundamental inalienable human rights and freedoms, derived from the right to life and health protection, directly enshrined in the Constitution of the Russian Federation."
In the interests of N.Y.S. the prosecutor appealed to the court with a suit against city district administration in order to oblige to provide a comfortable living accommodationwhich meets the established standards and technical requirements and to conclude a specialized residential lease agreement for 5 years.
The decision of the Oktyabrskiy district court declared: to satisfy the claims of the prosecutor. To oblige the city district administration to provide N.Y.S. comfortable living accommodation meeting the established standards and technical requirements and to concludea specialized residential lease agreement for 5 years (accommodation of at least 14 square meters).
The judicial boards for civil cases of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Bashkortostan upheld this decision and used arguments, including the provisions of the article 11 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, which guarantees the right of a person to adequate housing.
I.A.F. appealed to the court arguing that the defendant (government agency, the Pension Fund of the Russian Federation in Petrozavodsk, Republic of Karelia) denied an early old-age pension due to inadequate length of service with difficult working conditions. The petitioner considered this decision as illegal and asked to include certain periods of time in the work experience with difficult working conditions as well as to oblige the defendant to grant him an early old-age insurance pension.
The decision of Petrozavodsk city court of the Republic of Karelia dated July 1, 2015 satisfied the claims.
The Supreme Court of the Republic of Karelia upheld the decision and followed the provisions of Article 9 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, which provides for the right to social security.
In order to further enhance the effectiveness of judicial protection of the rights provided for in the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, periodic reviews of the judicial practice of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation systematically provide information on the current practices and legal positions of the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights developed during the examination of individual complains.
For example, the Judicial Review of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation No. 3 (2016), approved by the Presidium of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation dated October 19, 2016, included information on legal positions and circumstances of the case involving theconsideration by the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights of communication No. 1/2013 Miguel Angel Lopez Rodriguez vs. Spain. The Judicial Review of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation No. 2 (2016), approved by the Presidium of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation dated July 16, 2016, included information on legal positions and circumstances of the case connected with communication No. 2/20141/2013 I.D.G. vs. Spain considered by the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights.
Texts of decisionsadopted by the Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights following the consideration of complains are posted on the official website of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation in the section "Departmental Outline" ("International Law") accessible to lower courts.
Taking into account the interdependence of human rights and fundamental freedoms, information on practices of otherintergovernmental bodies on the protection of human rights andfundamental freedoms, including the Human Rights Committee, Committee against Torture, Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, Committee on the Elimination of the Discrimination Against Women, European Court of Human Right, is brought to the attention of judges and employees of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation and lower courts. Documents adopted by these bodies, including those taken on the basis of the examination of individual complaints (communications, statements), decisions (resolutions, opinions, views) are posted on the official website of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation in the section "Departmental Outline" ("International Law").
Annex № 2 (to question 6 of the Listof issues)
Table 1. Expenditures of budgets of the budgetary system of the Russian Federation(Consolidated budget of the Russian Federation and budgets of state extra-budgetary funds, bln. rub)
Title / 2013 / 2014 / 2015 / 2016
Education / 2 888,8 / 3 037,3 / 3 034,6 / 3 103,1
% to total expenditures / 11,4% / 11,0% / 10,4% / 9,9%
% to GDP / 4,1% / 3,8% / 3,6% / 3,6%
Health care / 2 318,0 / 2 532,7 / 2 861,0 / 3 124,4
% to total expenditures / 9,2% / 9,2% / 9,8% / 10,0%
% to GDP / 3,3% / 3,2% / 3,4% / 3,6%
Social policy / 8 757,2 / 8 803,3 / 10 055,4 / 10 914,2
% to total expenditures / 34,6% / 31,9% / 34,3% / 34,8%
% to GDP / 12,3% / 11,1 / 12,1 / 12,7%
Table 2. Expenditures of the federal budget on state support to citizens in providing housing and communal services (bln. rub).
2013 / 2014 / 2015 / 2016State Program of the Russian Federation "Providing Citizens of the Russian Federation with Accessible and Comfortable Housing and Communal Services" / 117,0 / 77,5 / 111,6 / 62,3
Table 3. Expenditures of the budgets of the subjects of the Russian Federation and municipal entities on state support to citizens in providing housing and communal services (bln. rub)
Budgetary allocations to the subjects of the Russian Federation and municipal entities / Expenditures of the consolidated budgets of the subjects of the Russian FederationIn kind / In monetary form
2012 / 2015 / 2012 / 2015 / 2012 / 2015
Payment for accommodation and utilities / 102,0 / 134,1 / 14,9 / 22,2 / 93,7 / 111,9
Provisionofhousing / 10,5 / 19,0 / 4,9 / 98,5 / 5,1 / 9,2
Provision of fuel / 2,7 / 2,8 / 0,1 / *** / 2,6 / 2,8
Payment and installation of the phone / 5802,6 / 6268,4 / 17,3 / 2,7 / 5681,1 / 6265,7
Table 4. Providing citizens with social support for housing and utilities payments
Year / Number of citizens who enjoy social support mln. people / Amount of funds provided for social support of citizens to pay for housing and utilities,bln. rub / Average monthly social support per user, rub2013 / 37,2 / 266,9 / 598
2014 / 36,7 / 275,8 / 626
2015 / 36,7 / 287,7 / 654
Table 5. Subsidies for payment of housing and utilities provided to citizens
Year / Numberofsubsidyservices / Number of families receiving subsidies / Total amount of accrued subsidies,bln. rub / Average monthly subsidy per family, rubles,
mln. / as a percentage of the total number of families
2013 / 2791 / 3,55 / 6,4 / 59,1 / 1096
2014 / 2769 / 3,39 / 6,1 / 59,7 / 1157
2015 / 2543 / 3,35 / 6,0 / 62,7 / 1241
Annex № 3 (to question 14 of the List of issues)
Employment and unemployment in 2013 - 2016
Table 1. Number of unemployed and unemployment rate in 2013-2016
2013 / 2014 / 2015 / 2016Number of unemployed (total), thousand people / 4137,4 / 3889,4 / 4263,9 / 4243,5
Unemploymentrate, % / 5,5 / 5,2 / 5,6 / 5,5
Table 2. Number of unemployed and unemployment rate disaggregated bysex in 2013-2016
2013 / 2014 / 2015 / 2016 / 2013 / 2014 / 2015 / 2016
Number of unemployed (total), thousand people / 2241,6 / 2123,4 / 2296,2 / 2268,7 / 1895,9 / 1766,0 / 1967,8 / 1974,8
Unemploymentrate, % / 5,8 / 5,5 / 5,8 / 5,7 / 5,2 / 4,8 / 5,3 / 5,3
Table 3. Number of unemployed and unemploymentrate disaggregated by type of settlement in 2013-2016
City / Rural2013 / 2014 / 2015 / 2016 / 2013 / 2014 / 2015 / 2016
Number of unemployed (total), thousand people / 2635,9 / 2480,9 / 2825,5 / 2805,4 / 1501,6 / 1408,5 / 1438,4 / 1438,1
Unemploymentrate, % / 4,6 / 4,3 / 4,8 / 4,8 / 8,3 / 7,9 / 7,9 / 8,0
Table 4. Number of unemployed and unemployment rate disaggregated by age in 2013-2016
Number of unemployed (total),thousand people / Unemploymentrate, %
Year / 2013 / 2014 / 2015 / 2016 / 2013 / 2014 / 2015 / 2016
Aged: 15 to 72 years / 4137,4 / 3889,4 / 4263,9 / 4243,5 / 5,5 / 5,2 / 5,6 / 5,5
Aged: 15 to19 years / 179,2 / 162,1 / 198,8 / 178,4 / 26,1 / 28,0 / 32,4 / 29,1
Aged:20to24 years / 880,4 / 790,5 / 842,5 / 811,1 / 12,6 / 12,4 / 14,3 / 14,9
Aged:25to29 years / 647,3 / 616,4 / 688,3 / 700,8 / 6,0 / 5,6 / 6,2 / 6,3
Aged:30 to 34 years / 491,8 / 484,1 / 541,3 / 557,9 / 5,0 / 4,8 / 5,1 / 5,1
Aged:35 to 39 years / 420,1 / 395,9 / 440,1 / 459,3 / 4,4 / 4,1 / 4,5 / 4,6
Aged:40 to 44 years / 352,3 / 334,3 / 373,6 / 380,3 / 4,1 / 3,8 / 4,1 / 4,0
Aged:45 to 49 years / 374,8 / 339,8 / 344,0 / 336,8 / 4,1 / 3,9 / 4,0 / 4,0
Aged:50 to 54 years / 433,8 / 407,4 / 444,9 / 417,6 / 4,4 / 4,1 / 4,5 / 4,3
Aged:55 to 59 years / 247,6 / 246,1 / 272,6 / 270,2 / 3,8 / 3,7 / 3,9 / 3,8
Aged:60 to 72 years / 110,3 / 112,8 / 117,9 / 131,0 / 3,2 / 3,2 / 3,1 / 3,3
Annex № 4 (to question 18 of the List of issues)
Number of employed in the informal sector(primary employment) disaggregated by sex and age, thousand people2013 / 2014 / 2015 / 2016
Total / 12883 / 13115 / 13569 / 13866
Including at the age of:
15-19 / 244 / 199 / 203 / 217
20-24 / 1419 / 1303 / 1208 / 1110
25-29 / 1865 / 1946 / 2019 / 2025
30-34 / 1750 / 1805 / 1926 / 1966
35-39 / 1649 / 1735 / 1770 / 1814
40-44 / 1460 / 1535 / 1619 / 1703
45-49 / 1520 / 1446 / 1482 / 1480
50-54 / 1427 / 1487 / 1542 / 1555
55-59 / 892 / 933 / 1033 / 1107
60-72 / 657 / 726 / 766 / 888
Men / 7107 / 7273 / 7573 / 7740
Including at the age of:
15-19 / 131 / 110 / 113 / 123
20-24 / 801 / 746 / 689 / 638
25-29 / 1093 / 1130 / 1201 / 1197
30-34 / 1005 / 1045 / 1138 / 1151
35-39 / 912 / 965 / 999 / 1007
40-44 / 808 / 853 / 895 / 942
45-49 / 826 / 807 / 810 / 816
50-54 / 752 / 784 / 817 / 844
55-59 / 474 / 506 / 555 / 602
60-72 / 307 / 327 / 355 / 419
Women / 5776 / 5842 / 5996 / 6125
Including at the age of:
15-19 / 114 / 90 / 90 / 95
20-24 / 618 / 556 / 519 / 472
25-29 / 772 / 815 / 818 / 828
30-34 / 745 / 760 / 788 / 815
35-39 / 737 / 770 / 771 / 807
40-44 / 652 / 682 / 724 / 761
45-49 / 694 / 639 / 672 / 664
50-54 / 675 / 703 / 725 / 711
55-59 / 418 / 427 / 478 / 504
60-72 / 350 / 399 / 410 / 469
Number of employed in the informal sector (primary employment) by disaggregated sex and types of economic activity, thousand people
2013 / 2014 / 2015 / 2016
Total / 12883 / 13115 / 13569 / 13866
Including by types of economic activity:
Agriculture, huntingandforestry / 2541 / 2435 / 2564 / 2650
Fishery, fishfarming / 32 / 31 / 41 / 38
Mining / 21 / 22 / 21 / 25
Manufacturing / 1248 / 1234 / 1273 / 1354
Production and distribution of electricity, gas and water / 32 / 38 / 36 / 35
Construction / 1511 / 1593 / 1663 / 1562
Wholesale and retail trade; repair of motor vehicles, motorcycles, household goods and personal items / 4605 / 4594 / 4637 / 4681
Hotelsandrestaurants / 384 / 428 / 463 / 501
Transportandcommunication / 1194 / 1262 / 1304 / 1348
Financialactivities / 29 / 37 / 36 / 36
Real estate transactions, rent and other services / 504 / 539 / 573 / 590
Education / 70 / 74 / 79 / 98
Health care and social services / 106 / 120 / 124 / 140
Provision of other utilities, social, personal and other services / 606 / 706 / 751 / 808
Men / 7107 / 7273 / 7573 / 7740
Including by types of economic activity:
Agriculture, huntingandforestry / 1420 / 1358 / 1453 / 1534
Fishery, fishfarming / 28 / 28 / 38 / 34
Mining / 19 / 19 / 19 / 23
Manufacturing / 748 / 732 / 787 / 813
Production and distribution of electricity, gas and water / 26 / 31 / 29 / 30
Construction / 1385 / 1453 / 1525 / 1436
Wholesale and retail trade; repair of motor vehicles, motorcycles, household goods and personal items / 1765 / 1812 / 1823 / 1862
Hotelsandrestaurants / 101 / 109 / 119 / 141
Transportandcommunication / 1080 / 1137 / 1172 / 1223
Financialactivities / 11 / 14 / 13 / 13
Real estate transactions, rent and other services / 318 / 345 / 356 / 379
Education / 19 / 19 / 19 / 28
Health care and social services / 39 / 45 / 45 / 49
Provision of other utilities, social, personal and other services / 148 / 172 / 175 / 174
Women / 5776 / 5842 / 5996 / 6125
Including by types of economic activity:
Agriculture, huntingandforestry / 1121 / 1077 / 1111 / 1116
Fishery, fishfarming / 3 / 3 / 3 / 4
Mining / 2 / 3 / 2 / 2
Manufacturing / 500 / 503 / 486 / 541
Production and distribution of electricity, gas and water / 6 / 8 / 7 / 5
Construction / 126 / 140 / 139 / 126
Wholesale and retail trade; repair of motor vehicles, motorcycles, household goods and personal items / 2839 / 2782 / 2814 / 2819
Hotelsandrestaurants / 283 / 319 / 344 / 360
Transportandcommunication / 114 / 125 / 132 / 124
Financialactivities / 18 / 23 / 23 / 23
Real estate transactions, rent and other services / 186 / 194 / 217 / 212
Education / 51 / 55 / 61 / 69
Health care and social services / 67 / 76 / 79 / 90
Provision of other utilities, social, personal and other services / 458 / 534 / 577 / 634
Number of employed in the informal sector (primary employment*) disaggregated by status,
thousand people
2013 / 2014 / 2015 / 2016
Total / 12883 / 13115 / 13569 / 13866
Including by status:
employed / 7907 / 8159 / 8524 / 8631
free-lance / 4976 / 4956 / 5045 / 5235
Of them
Employers / 783 / 833 / 825 / 813
Self-employed / 3960 / 3866 / 3982 / 4161
family business workers *) / 234 / 258 / 237 / 261
*) including family members helping as farm workers.
Annex № 5 (to question 25 of the List of issues)
Table 1. Proportion of poor population in the total population in 2016 for the subjects of the Russian Federation, as a percentage of the total population
Share of population with money income below the subsistence level / The share of population with money income is lower:40% of the median per capita money income / 50% of the median per capita money income
Russian Federation / 13,5 / 11,6 / 18,3
CentralFederalDistrict
Belgorod Region / 8,0 / 10,7 / 17,3
Bryansk Region / 13,4 / 9,8 / 16,4
Vladimir Region / 14,6 / 8,1 / 14,6
VoronezhRegion / 9,3 / 11,3 / 18,0
IvanovoRegion / 14,7 / 8,4 / 14,9
Kaluga Region / 10,6 / 9,4 / 16,0
Kostroma Region / 13,0 / 8,2 / 14,6
Kursk Region / 9,9 / 9,7 / 16,3
Lipetsk Region / 8,9 / 10,1 / 16,7
MoscowRegion / 8,2 / 10,6 / 17,3
Orel Region / 14,0 / 8,9 / 15,5
RyazanRegion / 12,7 / 9,1 / 15,6
Smolensk Region / 17,8 / 8,7 / 15,2
Tambov Region / 10,3 / 9,9 / 16,5
TverRegion / 12,5 / 7,2 / 13,4
Tula Region / 10,2 / 9,2 / 15,7
Yaroslavl Region / 10,8 / 9,8 / 16,4
Moscow / 9,0 / 12,1 / 18,8
NorthwesternFederalDistrict
RepublicofKarelia / 17,1 / 6,6 / 12,7
Komi Republic / 16,7 / 10,2 / 16,8
Arkhangelsk Region / 14,7 / 9,1 / 15,7
including:
NenetsAutonomousArea / 10,4 / 12,0 / 18,7
Arkhangelsk Region w/o Nenets Autonomous Area / 14,3 / 8,5 / 14,9
Vologda Region / 13,3 / 8,8 / 15,3
KaliningradRegion / 14,5 / 8,5 / 15,0
Leningrad Region / 10,2 / 9,5 / 16,1
Murmansk Region / 13,0 / 8,4 / 14,9
NovgorodRegion / 14,7 / 9,1 / 15,7
PskovRegion / 19,0 / 7,1 / 13,3
Saint-Petersburg / 8,0 / 11,8 / 18,5
SouthernFederalDistrict
RepublicofAdygeya / 13,6 / 9,4 / 16,0
RepublicofKalmykia / 31,2 / 8,8 / 15,3
RepublicofCrimea / 20,6 / 6,5 / 12,6
Krasnodar Region / 11,7 / 11,7 / 18,4
AstrakhanskRegion / 16,3 / 9,7 / 16,3
VolgogradRegion / 15,1 / 7,7 / 14,0
Rostov Region / 13,9 / 10,3 / 16,9
Sevastopol / 14,9 / 7,3 / 13,6
NorthCaucasianFederalDistrict
RepublicofDagestan / 10,7 / 10,0 / 16,6
RepublicofIngushetia / 31,7 / 8,0 / 14,4
Kabardino-BalkarRepublic / 24,7 / 8,0 / 14,4
Karachayevo-CherkessianRepublic / 24,7 / 7,9 / 14,3
Republic of North Ossetia-Alania / 14,6 / 8,3 / 14,7
ChechenRepublic / 18,0 / 10,6 / 17,3
Stavropol Region / 14,1 / 9,4 / 16,0
PrivolzhskyFederalDistrict
RepublicofBashkortostan / 12,4 / 11,8 / 18,5
Republic of Mari El / 23,2 / 8,8 / 15,3
RepublicofMordovia / 18,7 / 8,4 / 14,9
RepublicofTatarstan / 7,5 / 11,6 / 18,3
UdmurtianRepublic / 12,3 / 9,1 / 15,6
ChuvashRepublic / 18,8 / 7,2 / 13,4
PermRegion / 14,8 / 11,6 / 18,3
KirovRegion / 16,0 / 7,3 / 13,6
Nizhny NovgorodRegion / 9,7 / 10,9 / 17,6
Orenburg Region / 14,6 / 9,4 / 16,0
Penza Region / 14,9 / 9,0 / 15,5
Samara Region / 15,4 / 10,4 / 17,0
Saratov Region / 17,6 / 8,6 / 15,1
Ulianovskaya oblast / 15,4 / 8,5 / 14,9
UralFederalDistrict
KurganRegion / 19,2 / 8,4 / 14,9
SverdlovskRegion / 10,1 / 11,4 / 18,1
TyumenRegion / 15,5 / 12,4 / 19,1
including:
Khanti-Mansiysk Autonomous Area –Ugra / 13,8 / 10,7 / 17,4
Yamalo-NenetsAutonomousArea / 8,2 / 11,8 / 18,5
TyumenskRegion (except for Khanti-Mansiysk Autonomous Area –Ugra and Yamalo-Nenets Autonomous Area / 15,1 / 10,5 / 17,2
CheliabinskRegion / 14,4 / 8,3 / 14,7
SiberianFederalDistrict
Republic of Altai / 26,8 / 7,3 / 13,6
RepublicofBuryatia / 18,3 / 11,2 / 17,9
Republicof Tyva / 42,5 / 8,0 / 14,4
RepublicofKhakassia / 17,4 / 8,5 / 14,9
AltaiyskiyTerritory / 17,9 / 9,2 / 15,7
Trans-BaikalTerritory / 21,1 / 9,1 / 15,6
KrasnoyarskTerritory / 18,5 / 10,7 / 17,4
Irkutsk Region / 20,9 / 9,0 / 15,5
KemerovoRegion / 16,4 / 8,3 / 14,7
NovosibirskRegion / 16,9 / 9,1 / 15,7
Omsk Region / 14,4 / 11,0 / 17,7
Tomsk Region / 18,4 / 7,7 / 14,1
FarEasternFederalDistrict
RepublicofSakha ( Yakutia) / 19,4 / 10,5 / 17,2
KamchatkaTerritory / 19,5 / 7,3 / 13,5
PrimorskTerritory / 15,7 / 9,5 / 16,0
KhabarovskTerritory / 12,5 / 9,8 / 16,4
AmurRegion / 16,1 / 9,6 / 16,2
MagadanRegion / 15,0 / 8,9 / 15,4
SakhalinRegion / 9,5 / 11,6 / 18,3
JewishAutonomousRegion / 25,7 / 7,5 / 13,8
ChukotkaAutonomousArea / 10,6 / 10,0 / 16,6
Table 2. Proportion of population with income below the poverty line, set at the international level, taking into account purchasing-power parity