Add your student number here
12159
MEd Programme Suite
Assignment Marking and Feedback Sheet 2015/2016 – Level 7
Module No / 12159 / Module Title / Masters DissertationTask / Assignment / Weighting / 100%
Student No / Tutor
LEARNING OUTCOMES FOR THIS TASK / Met / Not Yet Met
Take careful note of any learning outcomes not yet met. You will need to meet these in other tasks in other modules.
Comments by 1st marker
Name / Date
Areas for further development
The work is over the prescribed word count:
No
Yes ………… 10-20% over more than 20% over
Note:
If your work is over-length the mark indicated below will be reduced by the appropriate penalty, subject to confirmation by the Module Board.
Verification - 2nd marker
Name / Date
Second marking is a verification procedure.
The role of the second marker is to check that the first marking has been carried out appropriately. The second marker is commenting on the marking standards of the first marker and is not expected to provide feedback to students (this is provided by the first marker).
Comments by moderator (if appropriate) / Name: / Date:
Agreed Internal Provisional Mark / NB: Any penalty for over length or late submission has not yet been applied
NOTE:
THIS MARK IS PROVISIONAL AND IS SUBJECT TO VERIFICATION BY THE EXTERNAL EXAMINER AND THE MODULE BOARD OF EXAMINERS.
IF THE WORK WAS SUBMITTED AFTER THE DEADLINE OR IF THE WORK EXCEEDS THE WORD COUNT, THE PRESCRIBED PENALTY WILL BE APPLIED PRIOR TO VERIFICATION OF THE MARK BY THE MODULE BOARD OF EXAMINERS.
1
Add your student number here
12159
Mark / Grading criteria / LO#1: demonstrate appropriate knowledge and understanding of educational and related theories that are relevant to their enquiry / LO#2: analyse, synthesise, critically evaluate and explain related concepts, showing understanding of alternative points of view / LO#3: apply selected aspects of theory to the work context and make informed, ethical judgements about practice / LO#4: identify, access, select, use and evaluate appropriate methods of enquiry to collect, analyse and report findings / LO#5: present information and data with clarity, demonstrating cognisance of standard academic conventions90-100 / Overwhelming evidence of insight and innovation
80-89 / Strong, convincing and consistent evidence of insight and nuance
70-79 / Strong and convincing evidence
60-69 / Good, robust evidence
50-59 / Evidence within work is sufficient and appropriate to the task.
40-49 / Work contains evidence of competence but application is limited
35-39 / Evidence included/provided but missing in some very important aspects
20-34 / Inappropriate evidence
0-19 / Negligible evidence
1