Access Assessment Standards: Subject Moderation - Quality Checklist

Access Assessment standards: Subject moderation - Quality checklist

Centre:
Programme: / Healthcare
Subject: / BZC136 Nutrition and Homeostasis
Assignment title: / Phase Test
Assignment task / To what extent is the task likely to deliver the evidence for the assessment criteria identified? / Please circle or delete as appropriate
4
Comment:
Nine of the assessment criteria are shown. The phase test is an excellent way of testing these.
Assessment
Evidence for a pass / Does the work the student has produced meet the demands of the task? / Yes
Comment:
The task is a set of short answer questions. The student has answered these clearly.
Does the work the student has produced deliver the evidence for the assessment criteria? In other words, is it a pass? / Yes
Comment:
The assessment criteria are shown. The student has answered the questions clearly and well.
Grading
Merit / With reference to the components or elements chosen for the assignment, is there sufficient evidence to indicate a merit grade for: / Please circle or delete as appropriate, using N/A if the grading descriptor has not been used in the assignment.
· Understanding of the subject? Component chosen is 1a (the student demonstrates a very good grasp of the relevant knowledge base). / Distinction awarded.
· Application of knowledge? / N/K
· Application of skills? / N/K
· Use of information? / N/K
· Communication and presentation. Item chosen is shows very good command of language (including technical or specialist language). / Distinction awarded.
· Autonomy/independence? / N/K
· Quality? Component chosen is 7c (student’s work, taken as a whole, demonstrates a very good response to the demands of the brief/assignment.) / Distinction awarded.
Distinction / With reference to the components or elements chosen for the assignment, is there sufficient evidence to indicate a distinction grade for / Please circle or delete as appropriate, using N/A if the grading descriptor has not been used in the assignment.
· Understanding of the subject? Component chosen is 1a (the student demonstrates a very good grasp of the relevant knowledge base). / Distinction awarded.
· Application of knowledge? / N/K
· Application of skills? / N/K
· Use of information? / N/K
· Communication and presentation. Item chosen is shows very good command of language (including technical or specialist language). / Distinction awarded.
· Autonomy/independence? / N/K
· Quality? Component chosen is 7c (student’s work, taken as a whole, demonstrates a very good response to the demands of the brief/assignment.) / Distinction awarded.
Moderation / Is the assessment decision made by the original assessor the same as your own? (if No please explain why in box immediately below) /
Yes
Please summarise your feedback to the original assessor. / A good assignment.