Academic Scientific Committee for Research and Doctoral Studies

Fachhochschule Burgenland GmbH / /

Consortium of the International Joint Cross-Border PhD Programme in International Economic Relations and Management

Academic Scientific Committee for Research and Doctoral Studies

04 ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT OF THE DOCTORAL CANDIDATE
GENERAL INFORMATION
Institution/Study Programm: / International Joint Cross-Border PhD Programme in International Economic Relations and Management,
Juraj Dobrila University of Pula
University of Economics in Bratislava, Faculty of International Relations, Slovak Republic
University of West Hungary, Doctoral School István Széchenyi, Sopron, Hungary
University Burgenland of Applied Sciences Burgenland (UAS), Eisenstadt, Austria
Academic degree, name and surname of the PhD candidate:
E-mail: / Year for which the report is submitted:
SUPERVISOR(S)
Academic degree(s), name and surname: / Institution
1st supervisor
2nd supervisor
ANNUAL PROGRESS REPORT
Did you develope a work plan? / Yes No / Have you made a progress according the work plan?
Yes No
If you mark „no“ explain why and put suggestions how to improve
Describe the progress since the last report (max. 500 words):
Briefly describe the work plan for the next period
(max. 500 words):
Please indicate the difficulties which affect or may affect the course of your studies:
On a scale of 1 to 5 rate the quality of your own research progress
(since the last report): / 1 - insufficient 2 - sufficient 3 - good 4 – very good 5 - excellent
If you mark 1 or 2 explain why
On a scale of 1 to 5 rate the overall quality of your own work
(since the last report): / 1 - insufficient 2 - sufficient 3 - good 4 – very good 5 - excellent
If you mark 1 or 2 explain why
Participation in teaching / Course / Type od class (seminars, workshop, lecture) / Duration (per week in hours) / Total
Participation in scientific projects
(in the past academic year): / Institution / From / Till / Title and type of project
Training abroad
(in the past academic year): / Place / Institution / From (day/month/year) / Till (day/month/year) / Title and type of training
Participation in scientific and professional conferences
(In the past academic year): / Institution / From (day/month/year) / Till (day/month/year) / Title of the conferences
EVALUATION OF THE SUPERVISOR
On a scale of 1 to 5 rate: (1 - unsufficient, 2 - sufficient, 3 - good, 4 - very good, 5 - excellent) / Clear setting of research objectives and expectations from the PhD candidate / 12345
The availability of the supervisor / 12345
Encouraging in the publication of scientific papers / 12345
Mentor's relationship to the candidate overall / 12345
EVALUACIJA DOKTORSKOG STUDIJA
On a scale of 1 to 5 rate how are you satisfied with the quality of the annual doctoral program / 1 - insufficient 2 - sufficient 3 - good 4 – very good 5 - excellent
If you mark 1 or 2 explain why
Date and signature
Date: Signature of the candidate
M.P.