References

Abbott, M.L., Joireman, J., & Heather, R., (2002). The influence of district size, school size, and socioeconomic status on student achievement in Washington; a replication study using hierarchical linear modeling.

Aktamis, H. & Ergin, O., (2008). The effect of scientific process skills education on students’ scientific creativity, science attitudes, and academic achievements, Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, 9(1), 21 p.

Amrein-Beardsley, A., (2008). Methodological concerns about the education value-added assessment system. Educational Researcher, 37(2), 65-75.

Archbald, D. A.Kaplan, D., (2004). Parent choice versus attendance area assignment to schools: Doesmagnet-based school choice affect NAEP scores? International Journal of Educational Policy,Research, and Practice: Reconceptualizing Childhood Studies, 5(1), 3-35.

Archibald, S., (2006). Narrowing in on educational resources that do affect student achievement. Peabody Journal of Education, 81(4), 23-42.

Bangert-Drowns, R.L., Hurley, M.M., & Wilkinson, B., (2004). The effects of school-based writing-to-learn interventions on academic achievement: a meta-analysis, Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 29-58.

Bates, R., (2005). On the future of teacher education: challenges, context, and content, Journal of Education for Teaching, 31(4), 301-305.

Berry, B., Darling-Hammond, L., Hirsch, E., Robinson, S., & Wise, S., No Child Left Behind and the ‘highly qualified’ teacher: the promise and the possibilities, Center for Teaching Quality, 1-9.

Betebenner, D., (2004). An analysis of school district data using value-added methodology.

Bielinkski, J., Minnema, J., & Thurlow, M., (2002). A follow-up web-based survey: test and measurement expert opinions on the psychometric properties of out-of-level tests.

Callejo Perez, David M. (2008). Teachereducationand research: Imaginingteachereducationbetween past andfuture, American Educational History Journal, 35(1), 19-40.

Chiu, M., (2008). Achievements and self-concepts in a comparison of math and science: exploring theinternal/external frame of reference model across 28 countries, Educational Research andEvaluation, 14(3), 235-254.

Cochran-Smith, M. (2008). The New Teacher Education in the United States: Directions Forward. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 14(4), 271-282.

Cochran-Smith, M., (2003). Learning and unlearning: the education of teacher educators, Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 5-28.

Darling-Hammond, L., (2005). Educating the New Educator: TeacherEducation and the Future of Democracy, New Educator, 1(1), 1-18.

Darling-Hammond, L., (1999). Teacher quality and student achievement: a review of state policy evidence, Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.

Darling-Hammond, L., (2005). Prepping our teachers for teaching as a profession, The Education Digest, 22-27.

Darling-Hammond, L. & Baratz-Snowden, J., (2007). A good teacher in every classroom: preparing the highly qualified teachers our children deserve, Educational Horizons,Winter, 111-132.

Darling-Hammond, L. & Barnett, B., (2006). Highly qualified teachers for all, Educational Leadership, 14-20.

Darling-Hammond, L., Holtzman, D.J., Gatlin, S.J., & Heilig, J.V., (2005). Does teacher preparation matter? Evidence about teacher certification, Teach for America, and teacher effectiveness,Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13(42), 1-51.

Doran, H.C. (2003). Value-added analysis: a review of related issues.

Duatepe-Paksu, A. & Ubuz, B., (2009). Effects of drama-based geometry instruction on student achievement, attitudes, and thinking levels, The Journal of Educational Research, 102(4), 272-286.

Dunn, R., Honigsfeld, A., & Doolan, L.S., (2009). Instructional strategies on students’ achievements and attitudes: perceptions of educators in diverse institutions, The Clearing House, 82(3), 135-140.

DuPaul, G.J., Jitendra, A.K., Volpe, R.J., Tresco, K.E., Lutz, J.G., Junod, R.E.V., Cleary, K.S., Flammer,

L.M., & Mannella, M.C., (2006). Consultation-based academic interventions for children with ADHD: effects on reading and mathematics achievement, Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 34, 635-648.

Gallagher, K. S., Ed.Bailey, J. D., Ed., (2000). The Politics of TeacherEducation Reform. The National Commission on Teaching and America's Future. Yearbook of the Politics of Education Association. [Volume 13].

Gonzales, P., Williams, T., Jocelyn, L., Roey, S., Kastberg, D., & Brenwald, S., (2008). Highlights from TIMSS 2007: mathematics and science achievement of U.S. fourth- and eighth-grade students in an international context, NCES.

Graham, S., Berninger, V., & Fan, W., (2007). The structural relationship between writing attitude and writing achievement in first and third grade students, Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 516-536.

Grossman, P. &McDonald, M., (2008). Back to the future: Directions for research in teaching and teachereducation, American Educational History Journal, 45(1), 184-205.

Hailikari, T., Nevgi, A., & Komulainen, E., (2008). Academic self-beliefs and prior knowledge as predictors of student achievement in mathematics: a structural model, Educational Psychology, 28(1), 59-71.

Hanich, L.B. & Jordan, N.C., (2004). Achievement-related beliefs of third-grade children with mathematics and reading difficulties, The Journal of Educational Research, 97(5), 227-233.

Henderson, S., Petrosino, A., Guckenburg, S., & Hamilton, S., (2008). A second follow-up year formeasuring how benchmark assessments affect student achievement, REL.

Huang, F.L. & Moon, T.R., (2009). Is experience the best teacher? A multilevel analysis of teacher characteristics and student achievement in low performing schools. Educ Asse Eval Acc, 21, 209-234.

Hyson, M., Tomlinson, H.B., & Morris, C.A.S., (). Quality improvement in early childhood teacher education: faculty perspectives and recommendations for the future, 1-17,

Jepsen, C., & Rivkin, S. (2009). Class size reduction and student achievement: the potential tradeoff between teacher quality and class size. Journal of Human Resources, 44(1), 223-250.

Johnson, C.C., (2009). An examination of effective practice: moving toward elimination of achievement gaps in science, Journal of Science Teacher Education, 20, 287-306.

Lau, S. & Roeser, R.W., (2008). Cognitive abilities and motivational processes in science achievement and engagement: a person-centered analysis, Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 497-504.

Lee, O., Maerten-Rivera, J., Penfield, R.D., LeRoy, K., & Secada, W.G., (2008). Science achievement ofEnglish language learners in urban elementary schools: results of a first-year professionaldevelopment intervention, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(1), 31-52.

Lim, C. & Able-Boone, H., (2005). Diversity competencies with early childhood teacher preparation: Innovative practices and future directions, Journal of Early Childhood Teacher Education, 26, 225-238.

Linek, W.M., Sampson, M.B., Gomez, K.A., Linder, P.E., Torti, C., Levingston, C., & Palmer, J., (2009). Middle school alternatively certified science teachers: resources, teacher choices, and student achievement, The Journal of Educational Research, 102(6), 403-412.

Linn, R.L., (2008). Methodological issues in achieving school accountability. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 40(6), 699-711.

Liu, X., (2008). Applying hierarchical linear models (HLM) to estimate the school and children’s effects on reading achievement.

Lockwood, J.R., McCaffrey, D.F., Hamilton, L.S., Stecher, B., Le, V., & Martinez, J.F., (2007). The sensitivity of value-added teacher effect estimates to different mathematics achievementmeasures. Journal of Educational Measurement, 44(1), 47-67.

Lockwood, J.R., McCaffrey, D.F., Mariano, L.T., & Setodji, C., (2007). Bayesian methods for scalable multivariate value-added assessment. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 32(2), 125-150.

Malone, L.M., West, J., Flanagan, K.D., & Park, J., (2006). The early reading and mathematics achievement of children who repeated kindergarten or who began school a year late, IES NCES.

Mant, J., Wilson, H., & Coates, D., (2007). The effect of increasing conceptual challenge in primary science lessons on pupils’ achievement and engagement, International Journal of Science Education, 29(14), 1707-1719.

Martineau, J.A., (2006). Distorting value added: the use of longitudinal, vertically scaled student achievement data for growth-based, value-added accountability. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 31(1), 35-62.

McBride, B.A., Dyer, W.J., Liu, Y., Brown, G.L., & Hong, S., (2009). The differential impact of earlyfather and mother involvement on later student achievement, Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(2), 498-508.

McCaffrey, D.F., Lockwood, J.R., Koretz, D., Louis, T.A., & Hamilton, L., (2004). Models for value-added modeling of teacher effects. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29(1), 67-101.

McCann, T., & Johannessen, L. (2009). Mentoring Matters: The Challenge for Teacher Education. English Journal, 98(5), 108-111.

Muller, P.A., Stage, F.K., & Kinzie, J., (2001). Science achievement growth trajectories: understanding factors related to gender and racial-ethnic differences in precollege science achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 981-1012.

Munoz, M.A., Potter, A.P., & Ross, S.M., (2008). Supplemental educational services as a consequence of the NCLB legislation: evaluating its impact of student achievement in a large urban district, Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 13, 1-25.

NAEP, (2006). Comparing private schools and public schools using hierarchical linear modeling. No Child Left Behind Act. (2001). Pub. L. No. 107–110.

Noell, G.H., (2004). Technical Report of: Assessing Teacher Preparation Program Effectiveness: A Pilot Examination of Value Added Approaches.

Noell, G.H. & Burns, J.L., (2006). Value-added assessment of teacher preparation: An illustration ofemerging technology. Journal of Teacher Education, 57(1), 37-50.

Osborne, J. W., (2000). Advantages of HierarchicalLinearModeling. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7(1).

Ponitz, C., Rimm-Kaufman, S., Grimm, K., & Curby, T. (2009). Kindergarten Classroom Quality, Behavioral Engagement, and Reading Achievement. School Psychology Review, 38(1), 102-120.

Pressley, M., Mohan, L., Raphael, L.M., & Fingeret, L., (2007). How does Bennett Woods Elementary School produce such high reading and writing achievement? Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 221-240.

Provasnik, S., Gonzales, P., & Miller, D., (2009). U.S. performance across international assessments of student achievement, NCES.

RAND Research Brief, (2004). The promise and peril of using value-added modeling to measure teacher effectiveness.

Reckase, M.D., (2001). Methodological issues in describing the features and qualities of teacher education programs.

Reikeras, E.K.L., (2006). Performance in solving arithmetic problems: a comparison of children with different levels of achievement in mathematics and reading, European Journal of Special NeedsEducation, 21(3), 233-250.

Rothstein, J., (2008). Teacher quality in educational production: tracking, decay, and student achievement. NBER Working Paper No. 14442.

Rubin, D.B., Stuart, E.A., & Zanutto, E.L., (2004). A potential outcomes view of value-added assessment in education. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 29(1), 103-116.

Rumberger, R.W. & Palardy, G.J., (2005). Test scores, dropout rates, and transfer rates as alternative indicators of high school performance. American Educational Research Journal, 42(1), 3-42.

Schroeder, C.M., Scott, T.P., Tolson, H., Huang, T., & Lee, Y., (2007). A meta-analysis of national research: effects of teaching strategies on student achievement in science in the United States, Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(10), 1436-1460.

Schulting, A.B., Malone, P.S., & Dodge, K.A., (2005). The effect of school-based kindergarten transition policies and practices on child academic outcomes. Developmental Psychology, 41(6), 860-871.

Secker, C.V., (2002). Effects of inquiry-based teacher practices on science excellence and equity. The Journal of Educational Research, 95(3), 151-160.

Shen, C. & Tam, H.P., (2008). The paradoxical relationship between student achievement and self-perception: a cross-national analysis based on three waves of TIMSS data, Educational Research and Evaluation, 14(1), 87-100.

Shin, T., (2007). Comparison of three growth modeling techniques in the multilevel analysis of longitudinal academic achievement scores: latent growth modeling, hierarchical linear modeling, and longitudinal profile analysis via multidimensional scaling. Asia Pacific Education Review, 8(2), 262-275.

Shyyan, V., Thurlow, M.L., & Liu, K.K., (2008). Instructional strategies for improving achievement in reading, mathematics, and science for English language learners with disabilities, Assessment for Effective Intervention, 33(3), 145-155.

Sun, L.,Bender, W. N., &Fore III, C., (2003). Web-based certification courses: The future of teacherpreparation in special education?Teacher Education and Special Education, 26(2), 87-97.

Tienken, C., & Achilles, C. (2003). Changing Teacher Behavior and Improving Student Writing Achievement. Planning and Changing, 34, 153-168.

Tong, Y. & Kolen, M.J., (2007). Comparisons of methodologies and results in vertical scaling foreducational achievement tests. Applied Measurement in Education, 20(2), 227-253.

Vanneman, A., Hamilton, L., Anderson, J., Rahman, T., & National Center for Education Statistics, ((2009). Achievement Gaps: How Black and White Students in Public Schools Perform in Mathematics and Reading on the National Assessment of Educational Progress. Statistical Analysis Report. NCES 2009-455.

Vinesh, C. & Lloyd M., (2008). The methodological nettle: ICT and student achievement, British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(6), 1087-1098.

Wiebke, K., & Bardin, J. (2009). New Teacher Support: A Comprehensive Induction Program Can Increase Teacher Retention and Improve Performance. Journal of Staff Development, 30(1), 34-36.

Wilson, K., & Trainin, G. (2007). First-Grade Students' Motivation and Achievement for Reading, Writing, and Spelling. Reading Psychology, 28(3), 257-282.

Yoon, K., Duncan, T., Lee, S., Scarloss, B., & Shapley, K. (2007). Reviewing the Evidence on How Teacher Professional Development Affects Student Achievement. Issues & Answers. REL 2007-No. 033.

Yu, L. & White, D.B., (2002). Measuring value added school effect on Ohio six-grade proficiency test results using two-level hierarchical linear modeling.

Zhang, Y. & Zhang, L., (2002). Modeling school and district effects in the math achievement of Delaware students measured by DSTP: a preliminary application of hierarchical linear modeling inaccountability.