Poe's Theory of the Short Story

By Dana Gioia (2001)

Poe and Hawthorne never met, but the conjunction of the two talents occasioned a crucial moment in the history of the short story. In addition to his activities as a poet and fiction writer, Poe was a remarkable literary critic. In 1842 he enthusiastically reviewed the then-obscure first volume of Hawthorne's short stories, Twice-Told Tales. In his influential review Poe both recognized and articulated Hawthorne's powerfully innovative aesthetic. The defining characteristic of the short story, Poe affirmed, was its "unity of effect." The "skillful literary artist" should build a story carefully to create a "preconceived effect": In the whole composition there should be no word written of which the tendency, direct or indirect, is not to one pre-established design. What Poe essentially asked was short fiction be written in the manner of lyric poetry. Poets had traditionally aimed at integrating every element of style and theme to create a unified effect, but Poe's requirement was a revolutionary standard to apply to prose fiction, which had traditionally been more loosely constructed and casually executed. (Poe, a veteran magazine editor and journalist, perhaps applied the standards of the professional writer to the usually amateur procedures of early nineteenth-century short fiction.) Poe's review also made another revolutionary gesture—not usually noted by later critics. He proclaimed the short story, previously the underdog of literary forms, to be the greatest prose genre—"unquestionably the fairest field for the exercise of the loftiest talent, which can be afforded by the wide domains of mere prose."

The short story's great advantage, Poe maintained, was its ideal length, which was ample enough to produce "an intense and enduring impression" but short enough to be experienced at one sitting to produce a temporary "exultation of the soul" in the reader. The short story's length allowed the artist the opportunity to unify the total work for a single effect—to transform it, that is, from a mere narrative into a perfectly integrated work of art. In effect, Poe had described a literary tradition that hardly existed in 1842 outside a few tales by Hawthorne and himself. His visionary aesthetic, however, would prove prophetic to literature not only in America but also around the world.

A THEORY OF THE SHORT STORY

From Poe’s Review of Nathaniel Hawthorne’s Twice-Told Tales

Were we called upon . . .to designate that class of composition which. . .should best fulfill the demands of high genius. . .we should unhesitatingly speak of the prose tale as Mr. Hawthorne has here exemplified it. We allude to the short prose narrative, requiring from a half-hour to one or two hours in its perusal. The ordinary novel is objectionable, from its length. . . . As it cannot be read at one sitting, it deprives itself, of course, of the immense force derivable from totality. Worldly interests intervening during the pauses of perusal, modify, annul, or counteract, in a greater or less degree, the impressions of the book. But simple cessation in reading would, of itself, be sufficient to destroy the true unity. In the brief tale, however, the author is enabled to carry out the fullness of his intention, be it what it may. During the hour of perusal the soul of the reader is at the writer’s control. There are not external or extrinsic influences—resulting from weariness or interruption.

A skillful literary artist has constructed a tale. If wise, he has not fashioned his thoughts to accommodate his incidents; but having conceived, with deliberate care, a certain unique or single effect to be wrought out, he then invents such incidents—he then combines such events as may best aid him in establishing this preconceived effect. If his very initial sentence tend not to the outbringing of this effect, then he has failed in his first step. In the whole composition there should be no word written, of which the tendency, direct or indirect, is not to the one pre-established design. And by such means, with such care and skill, a picture is at length painted which leaves in the mind of him who comptemplates it with a kindred art, a sense of the fullest satisfaction. . .

We have said that the tale has a point of superiority even over the poem. In fact, while the rhythm of this latter is an essential aid in the development of the poem’s highest idea—the idea of the Beautiful—the artificalites of this rhythm are an inseparable bar to the development of all points of thought or expression, which have their basis in Truth. But Truth is often, and in very great degree, the aim of the tale. . .(Poe 232)