A study about assessment and evaluation[S1][S2]

NO NAME

NO NAME

[TR3]

Abstract[S4]:This is my abstract, this is my abstract, this is my abstract, this is my abstract, this is my abstract, this is my abstract, this is my abstract, this is my abstract, this is my abstract, this is my abstract, this is my abstract, this is my abstract, this is my abstract, this is my abstract, this is my abstract, this is my abstract, this is my abstract, this is my abstract, …

Introduction[S5]

Intro, intro, intro,intro,intro,intro,intro,… three feedback levels (Hattie & Timperley, 2007) and Narciss (2008) also emphasizes the medium by which feedback is delivered … intro, intro, …

Indent when you start a new paragraph ……………..intro,intro,intro,intro,intro,intro,intro,intro,intro,intro,intro,intro,intro,intro,

Theory.Cohen (1994) found …. theory, theory, theory, theory, theory, … Another view is presented by Van der Schaaf et al. (2013) …. theory, theory, theory, theory, theory,

Research question(s). Question, question, question, question, question, question, question, question, question, question, question, question,

Method

Participants

Lots of students participated in this study.Sample sample sample sample sample sample sample sample sample sample sample

Instruments

Questionnaire 1. Questionnaire 1, questionnaire 1,

Questionnaire 2. Questionnaire 2, questionnaire 2,

Results

Research question 1

Results, results,

Figures and Tables.All Figures and Tables must be referred to in the text (see Table 1), centered and formatted in line with APA 6. The caption appears below the figure or table and is left-justified.

Group 1 / Group 2
Mean / SD / Mean / SD
Variable 1 / x.xx / x.xx / x.xx / x.xx
Variable 2 / x.xx / x.xx / x.xx / x.xx

Table 1. An example of an APA formatted Table and caption.

Figure 1.An example of a banner for the EARLI SIG 1 conference in Munich.

Discussion

Discussion, discussion, discussion,… summary, interpretation and conclusion in relation to your results …. discussion, discussion, etc.

References[S6]

Cohen, E. G. (1994). Restructuring the classroom: Conditions for productive small groups. Review of Educational Research, 64(1), 1-35.

Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112.

Narciss, S. (2008). Feedback strategies for interactive learning tasks. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. J. G. Van Merriënboer & M. P. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (3rd ed., pp. 125-143). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Van der Schaaf, M., Baartman, L., Prins, F., Oosterbaan, A., & Schaap, H. (2013). Feedback dialogues that stimulate students’ reflective thinking. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 57(3), 227-245.

Acknowledgments[S7]

Our acknowledgements to the mysterious benefactor who funded our research.

[S1]

  • .Proposal length:
  • Paper, poster, roundtable workshop/demonstration: all max. 3 pages (title, 250 word abstract, main text, figures, tables, references – i.e. everything!)
  • Symposium: max. 2 pages for the symposium description (title, 250 word abstract, main text, figures, tables, references – i.e. everything!) AND max. 3 pages for each paper (see above). A symposium proposal can be max. 11 pages (2+3+3+3).
  • Workshop/demonstration: describe the proposed interactivity.
  • Margins: A4 with 2.54 cm (1 inch on all four sides).
  • Main text: Times New Roman 11 pt., full-justified.
  • Do not use page numbers, headers and footers, footnotes or endnotes.
  • Use APA 6 reference style throughout your paper and the reference section.
  • APA 6 guidelines apply for any and all cases not-specified in these guidelines.
  • Submit your proposal as .docx+ .pdf
  • Submit the max. 250 word abstract also in the online system in the box ‘abstract’.
  • You must conform to the guidelines. Reviewers will be asked to evaluate if your proposal meets them.

[S2]Title (and subtitle if you have one): Singe-spaced, Times New Roman, 14 pt., bold

[TR3]When accepted, in a final stage, please add your information:

Jane Doe, Department of Education, Sky-High University,

John Doe, Department of Psychology, Rainbow University,

[S4]

  • Leave one blank line before and after the abstract (Times New Roman 11pt.).
  • Abstract text: Singe spaced, Times New Roman 11 pt., full-justified.
  • Indent the abstract 1.27 cm (.5 inch) from the right and left margins.
  • Length: max. 250 words.
  • The abstract also has to be submitted in the system separately and it is restricted to max. 250 words. Any words over 250 will be cut off from the abstract.

[S5]

  • Level 1: Times New Roman, 11 pt., bold, left-justified. Continue main text on a new line.
  • Level 2: Times New Roman, 11 pt., bold, italic, left-justified. Continue main text on a new line.
  • Level 3: Times New Roman, 11 pt., italic, left-justified. Continue main text on the same line.
  • Use no more than 3 levels.
  • Leave one blank line before heading level 1 and level 2.
  • Do not indent the main text or leave a blank line afterlevel 1 and 2. Continue with main text after level 3.

[S6]

  • List and format references according to APA 6 in Times New Roman, 10 pt., full- justified, hanging with 1.27 cm (0.5 inch).

[S7]

Acknowledgements: Times New Roman, 10 pt., full-justified.