A practical and concise manual of the law relating to private trusts and trustees"
------
Click on text to copy text
The daily phoenix., January 04, 1866, Image 1
About The daily phoenix. (Columbia, S.C.) 1865-1878
Cestui Qui Trust = The Strawman
Rule of Grammar for the use of CAPITAL LETTERS used in a NAME: when CAPITAL letters are used anywhere in a NAME this always refers to a LEGAL ENTITY/FICTION, COMPANY or CORPORATION no exceptions.
e.g. John DOE or Doe: JANE (PASSPORT, DRIVER LICENSE, MARRIAGE CERTIFICATE and BIRTH CERTIFICATE)
C’EST TUI QUE TRUST: (pronounced set–a–kay) common term in NEW ZEALAND and AUSTRALIAor STRAWMAN common term inUSAor CANADA is a LEGAL ENTITY/FICTION created and owned by the GOVERNMENT whom created it.
“Legally, we are considered to be a FICTION, a concept or idea expressed as a NAME, a symbol. That LEGAL PERSON has no consciousness; it is a juristic PERSON, EN LEGIS, a NAME/word written on a piece of paper” – Jason Whitney, Presenter & Researcher: The Occult World of Commerce.
When you are born, (your Mothers’ WATER broke) your Parents Name you, for example John or Jane DOE. The Nurse or Doctor along with your Parents sign your Record of Live Birth (Title of Deed to Real Property) so your BIRTH CERTIFICATE could be created (a “certificate is a negotiable instrument; see Certi & fi-duc(e) iary & fi-cat(e) iary) for the purpose of “creating the LEGAL ENTITY/FICTION (this LEGAL ENTITY/FICTION is regulated and works in commerce as GOVERNMENT can only regulate that which it creates and it didn’t create the living breathing Man or Woman – God did). The LEGAL ENTITY/FICTION is registered by the Department of Commerce, under the ADMIRALTY MARITIME LAW/JURISDICTION (LAW of the WATER) – JURISDICTION of Commerce and War.
You (the baby) are what is called a “C’est tui Que (pronounced “Set–a–kay”) Trust, the STRAWMAN, or rather the COLLATERAL or the CORPUS (body) of the Trust. Your LABOUR is the energy you generate as a Living Being. However, as a baby, you are deemed “Invalid (in–valid/dis–abled) and Incompetent, and even though your Mother Birthed you, she agrees to be the TRUSTEE of the Trust (by her SIGNATURE) which was SETTLED (created–Settlor) by the Federal Government, so you (your body) are ENTRUSTED to her for safe keeping until the age of eighteen.
Under Biblical Law: WOMEN are incapable of entering into binding agreements/contracts, their Husband or Father must be present when making agreements or the contract is void. In most cases both parties are present during birth or manifestation of a MARITIME product. Unless prior written consent and approval by the male representative exists, the Mother who would not DREAM of “giving” her newborn baby to the Government, does so unknowingly, by the undisclosed conditions of the signed Contract” Submission of an Application for Registration for a BIRTH CERTIFICATE e.g.
You’re Parents “agree/consent” to be the Trustee and sign your BIRTH CERTIFICATE. (BIRTH CERTIFICATES were only for “slaves” prior to women becoming “equal” to men). Usually the Mother is the ONLY one required to sign, because she is deemed to be the direct blood more so than the Father. She has the higher “claim” to the living baby.
Once the negotiable instrument (BIRTH CERTIFICATE) is transferred to the Dept of Commerce, they “pledge” your “Labour for your Lifetime” as its “secured” asset, and proceeds to “assure” (different from insure) YOUR Labour against it’s (the government’s) DEBT, and it subsequently gets an “underwriter” to insure your Labour.
The underwriter determines a lowball figure from your Labour to be valued at $1 Million dollars, and it takes out a “Bond” which is held at the Bank, the numbers on your BIRTH CERTIFICATE are the tracking numbers for your LEGAL ENTITY/FICTIONS Bond. $1 million FEDERAL RESERVE notes are then issued with that same number and put into circulation.
On the LEGAL ENTITY/FICTIONS BIRTH CERTIFICATE, the one with your name in ALL CAPS (which represents an ENTITY/FICTION, CORPORATION) there is a “Bond” tracking number. That number has 7–9 digits with a “letter” in front of it. Get a 1 dollar bill and compare that “serial” number with the number on it. You will see the similarity. On the face of the dollar bill, is a letter inside a symbol with the words “FEDERAL RESERVE Bank of (State Name)” That is the letter designation of the State Bank which holds that Bond. example “E” is the Bank of Virginia. The letter of the number on the BIRTH CERTIFICATE is the Bank that is holding a Bond which represents your “labour” for your lifetime. Your “labour” has been “insured” and “assured”, and money has been borrowed against it. This is HOW people have been turned into collateral for the FEDERAL RESERVE Bank(s).
Legal Definitions
- Person: A human being is not a person because he is a human being, but because rights and duties have been ascribed to him
- The ‘person’ is the legal subject or substance of which rights and duties are attributes Black’s Law Dictionary Not a human being, but the human being invisible coat
- Application: Means to ‘beg, plead, petition, implore, entreat or request
- Must: Legally can be synonymous with ‘may’. Has two senses; Imperative or a directive. One creates obligations, the other defines conditions. Always a ‘directive’ when used with ‘apply’
- Submit: To agree to another’s will or to leave to another’s discretion. Form of surrender. Always voluntary. Implies lawful right to fight.
- Registration: To sign over all chattel content for safe keeping. always voluntary. Abandons complete ownership for partial.
Capitis Diminutio(meaning the diminishing of status through the use of capitalization) – In Roman law. A diminishing or abridgment of personality; a loss or curtailment of a man’s status or aggregate of legal attributes and qualifications.
Capitis Diminutio Minima (meaning a minimum loss of status through the use of capitalization, e.g. John Doe) - The lowest or least comprehensive degree of loss of status. This occurred where a man’s family relations alone were changed. It happened upon the arrogation [pride] of a person who had been his own master, (sui juris,) [of his own right, not under any legal disability] or upon the emancipation of one who had been under the patria potestas. [Parental authority] It left the rights of liberty and citizenship unaltered. See Inst. 1, 16, pr.; 1, 2, 3; Dig. 4, 5, 11; Mackeld. Rom.Law, 144.
Capitis Diminutio Media (meaning a medium loss of status through the use of capitalization, e.g. John DOE) – A lessor or medium loss of status. This occurred where a man loses his rights of citizenship, but without losing his liberty. It carried away also the family rights.
Capitis Diminutio Maxima (meaning a maximum loss of status through the use of capitalization, e.g. JOHN DOE or DOE JOHN) – The highest or most comprehensive loss of status. This occurred when a man’s condition was changed from one of freedom to one of bondage, when he became a slave. It swept away with it all rights of citizenship and all family rights.
The sun., June 27, 1899, Page 8, Image 8
About The sun. (New York [N.Y.]) 1833-1916
to mv reent communication toyou In regard to the failure of the MunicipalAssembly to vote on certain bond isHUes. andespecially thn Ismo of foOO.OOO for the sanitary protection of tho Croton watershed. Irake the llbeity or calling your attention to theprovisions of section Ml of thn charter, whluhprovides not onlv that the several members ofthe Municipal asemhly shall be consideredw hh trustees of the property, funds and effects ofald city respectively, so far as such pioperty.funds or efTocts arc or maj be committed toIhclr nianagoment or control, but also makes1-tl oftlcers of the city co-trustees with themlor that purpose, and provides expressly thatimv co-trueteo shall bo entitled as against saidtrustees and In'regnrd to said property, fundsand effects to all the rights and privileges provided by law for anr co-trustee or cestui quetrust to prosecute and maintain any action toprevent waste and Injury to any property,funds and estate held in trust-- The law of trusts and trustees: under the Trustee act 1888, the Trust ...
By Great Britain, Arthur Reginald Rudall, James William Greig
CESTUI QUE TRUST:
Abroad, persons resident abroad may be appointed trustees, 96.
Acquiescence by, in breach of trust, effect of, 6.
Appointment of, as trustee not favoured by Court, 96.
Charge secured by a trust, rights of, 6.
Extinguishment of trust by, 63.
Laches of, in bringing action for breach of trust, 6.
Remedy of, where trustees for sale sell under depreciatory conditions, 68.
Rights of, against purchaser for valuable consideration, 14.
Copernic Agent Search Results
Search:
CESTUI QUI TRUST
(All the words)Found:
96 result(s) on _Full.Search
Date:
3/14/2011 1:17:12 AM
1.May 19, 2005... paid for out of the common fund, i.e. company's money or trust fund, was thecommon property of the shareholders, or cestui qui trust. ... solicitor and client, trustee and cestui qui trust or the other relationships treated in equity as of afiduciary character. ... 87%3.
Cestui Qui Trust = The Strawman
Cestui Qui Trust = The Strawman. 1 / 3. Cestui Qui Trust = The Strawman. Rule of Grammar forthe use of CAPITAL LETTERS used in a NAME: when CAPITAL letters ... 87%4.@sfiorare can you understand Cestui Qui Trust wookie? WHORL GRROWL AWOOORK! chewysproud of ya sfiorare, chewys proud! ;) ... bankruptcy-software.com ...
Topic One: Equity, a Reprise
Æ Object: The beneficiary, cestui qui trust, or purpose of the trust. Æ Trusts may be created bywill (testamentary) or deed (inter vivos). ...
Cestui Que Trust - David Icke's Official Forums
Cestui Que Trust Freeman-On-The-Land. ... The Cestui Qui Vie Act of 1666 gives a person 7 yearsto prove they are alive, therefore meaning ...
Pacific Guardian
Cestui Qui Trust = The Strawman. Rule of Grammar for the use of CAPITAL LETTERS used in aNAME: when CAPITAL letters are used anywhere in a NAME this always ...
Cqv Cestui Que Vie Trust - Appointing The Judge Trustee In New ...
Feb 3, 2011 ... The state took custody of everybody and their property into a trust, the Cestui Quitrust, the state became the trustee/husband holding all ...
83%9.
DISTRICT COURT for _____County
That being completed the next point would be in that the maximum life of a Cestui Qui Trust islimited to 25 years and with no contract renewal and is now ...
Kids.Net.Au - Encyclopedia > Law French
cestui qui trust[?], the creator of a trust. cy-pres doctrine[?], the power of a court to transfer theproperty of one charitable trust to another charitable trust when ...
$21Silver.com « Carlton A. Weiss « Trustees in Commerce: A ...
I can create a thousand trusts, naming all of them based on the cestui qui trust, and thebeneficiaries don’t even have to be told they are beneficiaries for the trusts ...
Documents - Scribd
Cestui Qui Trust = The Strawman Rule of Grammar for the use of CAPITAL LETTERS used in aNAME: when CAPITAL letters are used anywhere in a NAME this always ...
Injunctions against trustees in comparison to action under Special ...
As the cestui que trust may compel the trustee to the observance of the duty, so , on the otherhand, if the cestui qui trust has reason to suppose and can ...
N.A.B Kotoye V Mrs F.M. Saraki & Anr
(i) taking away the beneficial interest of a cestui qui trust, or a Bank. (ii) merely protecting thelegal title of a registered holder of ...
Glossary & Terms » Estate Preservation Group, LLC
One who receives an advantage, recipient, donee, inheritor, legatee, receiver, cestui qui trust, heir,grantee, winner, and pensioner. COMMUNITY PROPERTY: ...
Trust and Teleology: Locke's Politics and his Doctrine of Creation*
and the cestui qui trust for whom the trust was created. ... we shall find it easy enough to identifytrustee and cestui qui trust, but who is the trustor? ... against the trust estate. As regards the beneficiary under the trust (cestui qui trust) his
right has always been regarded as a jus crediti. ...
30 U.S. 151
The plaintiffs' counsel seem to consider this as a case where the first ejectment was brought by atrustee, and the second by a cestui qui trust. ...
Download Johnny Liberty - Reclaiming Your Sovereign ...
Cestui Qui Trust - the strawman.docx: 16.42 KB : GlobalSovereignsHandbook-lulu-v4.pdf: 3.72 MB: Individual Sovereignty Process.pdf: 19.29 MB : Johnny Liberty - Reclaiming Your ...
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE DEWITT KENNARD ...
Feb 12, 2008 ... trustees, and conclusively presumes that acts done by them in regard to the trustproperty are done for the benefit of the cestui qui trust. ... 80%21.
No. ED 86875. - BERNDSEN v. FLAGSTAR BANK FSB - MO Court of ...
To qualify under this section, the mortgagor shall provide the request in the form of a demandletter to the mortgagee, cestui qui trust, or assignee by certified mail ...
Cestui Que Trust [Archive] - David Icke's Official Forums
[Archive] Cestui Que Trust Freeman-On-The-Land. ... The Cestui Qui Vie Act ...
Dec. - This Week in Georgia Civil War History
With Unabated Trust: Major Henry McDaniel's Love Letters from Confederate ... heirs, legatees orcestui qui trust; and all in his order direct in what ...
G.R. No. L-19872
... trust for the recovery of the property held in trust where (a) the trustee has performedunequivocal acts of repudiation amounting to an ouster of the cestui qui trust ...
House of Commons Standing Committee (pt 3)
"The office of cestui qui trust Is reserved for the learned and just, Any villain you choose Can becestui qui use, But a lawyer for cestui quitrust."
Cestui Qui Trust
The law of trusts and trustees: under the Trustee act 1888, the Trust ...
By Great Britain, Arthur Reginald Rudall, James William Greig
ks/ Section 8.—This Section effected a most important and much-needed alteration in the law. The effect is that, except in the three cases of fraud by a trustee, retention of trust property by him, or receipt by him and conversion of it to his own use, a trustee who has committed a breach of trust is entitled to the protection of the several Statutes of Limitations as if actions or proceedings for breaches of trust were enumerated in them (How v. Earl Winterton [1896], 2 Ch. 626). Even if the breach of trust is not barred by lapse of time under this Section, yet if the trustee has acted "honestly and reasonably, and ought fairly to be excused for the breach of trust, and for omitting to obtain the directions of the Court in the matter in which he committed such breach," the Court may now, under Section 3 of The Judicial Trustees Act, 1896 (59 60 Vict. c. 35), relieve him, either wholly or partly, from personal liability (see notes to Section 3, infra). Previous to the passing of The Trustee Act, 1888 (apart from The Bankruptcy Act, 1883, referred to hereafter) the state of the law as to how far the Statutes of Limitations applied to actions for breaches of trust seems to have been as follows:—
1. As to Express Trusts.—It is clear that they were not within the Statutes of Limitations. In Petre v. Petre (1 Drew. 393) the Vice-Chancellor of England said: "A person who is, under some instrument, an express trustee, or who derives title under such trustee, is precluded, how long soever he may have been in enjoyment of the property, from setting up the Statute." In Obee r. Bishop (1 De G. F. J. 137) Turner, L. J., said: "I am of opinion that it would be most dangerous to hold that a demand against the assets of a deceased trustee or personal representative, in respect of a breach of trust or misappropriation committed by him, is barred at the expiration of six years from his death." This has been followed in many subsequent cases, and the Statutes have been held not to apply, even after very long periods of time have elapsed (see Woodhouse v. Woodhouse, L. B., 8 Eq. 514; Butler v. Carter, L. R., 5 Eq. 276; and Edwards v. Warden, 1 App. Cas. 281). Any doubt on this point would be set at rest by Section 25, Sub-section 2, of The Judicature Act, 1873 (36 & 37 Vict. c. 66), which enacts that "no claim of a cestui que trust against his trustee for any property held on an express trust, or in respect of any breach of such trust, shall be held to be barred by any Statute of Limitations."
This may at first sight appear to be inconsistent with Section 10 of The Beal Property Limitation Act, 1874 (37 38 Vict. c. 57), which enacts that "after the commencement of this Act no action, suit, or other proceeding shall be brought to recover any sum of money or legacy charged upon or payable out of any land or rent, at law or in equity, and secured by an express trust, or to recover any arrears of rent or of interest in respect of any sum of money or legacy so charged or payable and so secured, or any damages in respect of such arrears, except within the time within which the same would be recoverable if there were not any such trust." But this is explained by the fact that the latter Section quoted applies as between land charged and the persons entitled to a charge, while the former applies to claims as between a cestui que trust and trustee (see Fearnside v. Flint, 22 Ch. D. 579; Hughes v. Coles, 27 Ch. D. 231).