Bias is a type of writing FOR (positive) or AGAINST (negative) a particular event, group, idea, concept, plan, or person. There are SEVEN ways that an author can reveal their bias.
Slanted Language and Evidence
- using words, images, and/or information that only show the positive or negative side of the argument or discussion
- this distorts reality, ignores differing points of view, and thus leaves the reader with the assumption that there was only one perspective
Exaggeration or Highly Emotional Statements
- using language that appeals to strong emotions, and not logic
- tone words (mood, feeling) that demonstrate approval or disapproval are often used in this type of writing
Name-Calling
- using belittling, degrading, or negative names to indicate disapproval (i.e. evil, lousy, liar, failure)
Linguistic Bias
- using discriminatory language
- EXAMPLE: First Nations people describes as “ROAMING,” “WANDERING,”
or “ROVING” across the land. This type of language implicitly justifies the seizure of Native lands by “MORE GOAL-DIRECTED” white Europeans who “TRAVELED” OR “SETTLED” their way west.
- EXAMPLE: Such words as FOREFATHERS, MANKIND, AND
BUSINESSMAN serve to deny the contributions (or even the existence) of females.
- EXAMPLE: Immigrant peoples are referred to as “SWARMS”
or “HOARDS.” These terms serve to dehumanize and reduce the diversity and intragroup differences.
Stereotyping and Over-Generalizing
- using statements that indicate that ALL members of one group are the same as ONE of its members
- takes the actions and behaviours of an individual and applies them to the entire group
Opinions Stated as Facts
- using arguments that assume an important point is truth
- proof or information needed to support an argument or position are neglected and left out
Unreality
- ignoring the existence of prejudice, racism, discrimination, exploitation, oppression, sexism, and intergroup conflict
- EXAMPLE: the internment of Japanese Canadians; the Canadian immigration policy towards Jews escaping Hitler’s reach; etc.
- when controversial topics are glossed over, this unrealistic coverage denies people the information they need to recognize and understand the problems that plague society
o this can also hinder the ability of people to perhaps conquer (solve) these same problems