Suppl. Fig. 1. Phylogenetic guide tree of rrs sequences of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and P. syringae. A neighbor – joining analysis with Jukes–Cantor correction and bootstrap support was performed on the rrs sequences belonging to P. aeruginosa – 67, and P. syringae - 21 (Suppl. Table 3) for identifying framework sequences. Sequences marked by filled square are the ones considered as framework in the study whereas type strains are indicated by ‘T’ as superscript. Bootstrap values are given at nodes. Values in parentheses are accession numbers (RDP and NCBI) (http://rdp.cme.msu.edu/ and http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/).
Suppl. Fig. 2. Phylogenetic guide tree of rrs sequences of Pseudomonas fluorescens and P. stutzeri. A neighbor – joining analysis with Jukes–Cantor correction and bootstrap support was performed on the rrs sequences belonging to Pseudomonas fluorescens – 62 and P. stutzeri - 40 (Suppl. Table. 3) for identifying framework sequences. Sequences marked by filled square are the ones considered as framework in the study whereas type strains are indicated by ‘T’ as superscript. Bootstrap values are given at nodes. Values in parentheses are accession numbers (RDP and NCBI) (http://rdp.cme.msu.edu/ and http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/).
Suppl. Fig. 3. Phylogenetic guide tree of rrs sequences of Pseudomonas putida. A neighbor – joining analysis with Jukes–Cantor correction and bootstrap support was performed on the rrs sequences belonging to Pseudomonas putida – 67 (Suppl. Table. 3) for identifying framework sequences. Sequences marked by filled square are the ones considered as framework in the study whereas type strains are indicated by ‘T’ as superscript. Bootstrap values are given at nodes. Values in parentheses are accession numbers (RDP and NCBI) (http://rdp.cme.msu.edu/ and http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/).
Suppl. Fig. 4. Phylogenetic tree of rrs of Pseudomonas sp. (segregated as P. stuzeri) and Framework sequences. A neighbor – joining analysis with Jukes–Cantor correction and bootstrap support was performed on the rrs sequences of Pseudomonas sp. - 66 (Suppl. Table. 4) along with 31 of phylogenetic framework (Fig. 1). Bootstrap values are given at nodes. Sequences marked by filled square are the ones considered as framework in the study whereas type strains are indicated by ‘T’ as superscript. Values in parentheses are accession numbers (RDP and NCBI) (http://rdp.cme.msu.edu/; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). Note: Out of a total of 197 (Suppl. Table. 4) Pseudomonas sp. rrs sequences, 66 as representative (shown in red) have been presented here.
Suppl. Fig. 5. Phylogenetic tree of rrs of Pseudomonas sp. (segregated as P. syringae) and Framework sequences. A neighbor – joining analysis with Jukes–Cantor correction and bootstrap support was performed on the rrs sequences of Pseudomonas sp. - 65 (Suppl. Table. 4) along with 31 of phylogenetic framework (Fig. 1). Bootstrap values are given at nodes. Sequences marked by filled square are the ones considered as framework in the study whereas type strains are indicated by ‘T’ as superscript. Values in parentheses are accession numbers (RDP and NCBI) (http://rdp.cme.msu.edu/; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/). Note: Out of a total of 141 (Suppl. Table. 4) Pseudomonas sp. rrs sequences, 65 as representative (shown in red) have been presented here.