A Rubric for Terror! -- or Romance
Objective: Review your preconceptions about what makes a story, movie, etc, either scary or romantic. In other words, what are the requirements for a horror or love story.
Task: After brainstorming a list of your favorite horror/ love stories, movies, etc, compile a list of at least four common traits. Do they characters have to be attractive? Does the story have to take place at night? Should the lovers hate each other at first? Does a horror story have to include a supernatural element?
Once you’ve decided on your four category requirements, you’ll begin composing your “Rubric.”
1. Review the PSSA rubric attached; use it as a model for your rubric.
2. Create at least 4 categories, and under each compose descriptions. Remember, this a rubric based on your personal preferences. You will use the rubric to grade your novel once you’ve finished.
Checklist Requirements:
______at least four categories represented ( should be reasonable)
______descriptions should explain categories.
______spelling, grammar, etc.
Additional points for illustrating your rubric in some way.
PSSA PERSUASIVE PROMPT SCORING RUBRIC STUDENT______SCORE_____
FOCUS / CONTENT/DEVELOPMENT /ORGANIZATION
/STYLE
/CONVENTIONS
4 /Sharp, distinct controlling point presented as a position and made convincing through a clear, thoughtful, and substantial argument with evident awareness of task and audience
/ Substantial, relevant and illustrative content that demonstrates a clear understanding of the purpose. Thoroughly elaborated argument that includes a clear position, consistently supported with precise and relevant evidence. Rhetorical (persuasive) strategies are evident. /Effective organizational strategies and structures, such as logical order and transitions, to develop a position supported with a purposeful presentation of content.
/Precise control of language, stylistic techniques, and sentence structures that creates a consistent and effective tone.
/Thorough control of sentence formation. Few errors, if any, are present in grammar, usage, spelling and punctuation, but the errors that are present do not interfere with meaning.
3 /Clear controlling point presented as a position and made convincing through a credible ad substantiated argument with general awareness of task and audience..
/ Adequate, specific, and/or illustrative content that demonstrates an understanding of the purpose. Sufficiently elaborated argument that includes a clear position supported with some relevant evidence. Rhetorical (persuasive) strategies may be evident. /Organizational strategies and structures, such as logical order and transitions, to develop a position supported with sufficient presentation of content.
/Appropriate control of language, stylistic techniques, and sentence structures that creates a consistent tone.
/Adequate control of sentence formation. Some errors may be present in grammar, usage, spelling and punctuation, but few, if any, of the errors that are present may interfere with meaning.
2 /Vague evidence of a controlling point presented as a position that may lack a credible and/or substantiated argument with an inconsistent awareness of task and audience.
/ Inadequate, vague content that demonstrates a weak understanding of the purpose. Insufficiently elaborated argument that includes an underdeveloped position supported with little evidence. /Inconsistent organizational strategies and structures, such as logical order and transitions, which ineffectively develop a position with inadequate presentation of content.
/Limited control of language and sentence structures that creates interference with tone.
/Limited and/or inconsistent control of sentence formation. Some sentences may be awkward or fragmented. Many errors may be present in grammar, usage, spelling and punctuation and some of those errors may interfere with meaning.
1 /Little or no evidence of a controlling point presented as a position that lacks a credible and/or substantiated argument with minimal awareness of task and audience.
/ Minimal evidence of content that demonstrates a lack of understanding of the purpose. Unelaborated argument that includes an undeveloped position supported with minimal or no evidemce /Little or no evidence of organizational strategies and structures, such as logical order and transitions, to develop a position with insufficient presentation of content.
/Minimal control of language and sentence structures that creates an inconsistent tone.
/Minimal control of sentence formation. Many sentences are awkward and fragmented. Many errors may be present in grammar, usage, spelling and punctuation, and many of those errors may interfere with meaning.
NON-SCORABLE / OFF-PROMPT· Is illegible, i.e., includes so many indecipherable words that no sense can be made of the response
· Is incoherent, i.e., words are legible but syntax is so garbled that response makes no sense
· Is insufficient, i.e., does not include enough to assess domains adequately
· Is a blank paper / · Is readable but did not respond to prompt
September 2006 In effect for 11th grade writing assessment for February 2006
______SCORING RUBRIC STUDENT______SCORE_____
4 / / / /3 / / / /
2 / / / /
1 / / / /
NON-SCORABLE / OFF-PROMPT
· Is illegible, i.e., includes so many indecipherable words that no sense can be made of the response
· Is incoherent, i.e., words are legible but syntax is so garbled that response makes no sense
· Is insufficient, i.e., does not include enough to assess domains adequately
· Is a blank paper / · Is readable but did not respond to prompt
September 2006 In effect for 11th grade writing assessment for February 20