Gonzaga Debate Institute 2010 56

Gonzaga Debate Institute 2010 56

Scholars PMC’s Aff

PMC Aff – Advantage Core

Gonzaga Debate Institute 2010 56

Scholars PMC’s Aff

PMC Aff – Advantage Core 1

Inherency – 1AC – Congress 5

Inherency – PMC’s Now 6

Solvency – 1AC – Congress 7

Solvency – Congress 8

Solvency – USFG 9

Solvency – USFG 10

Iraq Forces Adv. – Uniqueness – Iraq Military 11

Iraq Forces Adv. – Iraq Forces Solve 12

Iraq Forces Adv. – Link – Counterinsurgency 13

Iraq Forces Adv. – Link – Counterinsurgency 14

Iraq Forces Adv. – Link – Hearts and Minds 15

Iraq Forces Adv. – Link – Backlash 16

Iraq Forces Adv. – Link – Resentment 17

Iraq Forces Adv. – Link – Perception 18

Iraq Forces Adv. – Impact – Iraqi Instability 19

Iraq Forces Adv. – Impact – Iraqi Instability 20

Hollow Forces Adv. – Uniqueness – Tipping Point 21

Hollow Forces Adv. – Uniqueness – Afghanistan Military 22

Hollow Forces Adv. – Link – Generic 23

Hollow Forces Adv. – Link – Generic 24

Hollow Forces Adv. – Link – Police Training 25

Hollow Forces Adv. – Link – Afghan Retention 26

Hollow Forces Adv. – Link – Afghan Retention 27

Hollow Forces Adv. – Link – Afghan Retention 28

Hollow Forces Adv. – Link – Afghan Readiness 29

Hollow Forces Adv. – Link – Afghanistan Instability 30

Hollow Forces Adv. – I/L – Afghan Police Key 31

Hollow Forces Adv. – I/L – Afghan Army Key 32

Hollow Forces Adv. – I/L – Supply Chain 33

Hollow Forces Adv. – I/L – Supply Chain 34

Hollow Forces Adv. – I/L – Causes Insurgency 35

Hollow Forces Adv. – Afghanistan Forces Solve 36

Hollow Forces Adv. – Impact – Afghanistan Failure = NW 37

Hollow Forces Adv. – Impact – Prolif 38

Hollow Forces Adv. – Impact – Prolif 39

Hollow Forces Adv. – Impact – Prolif 40

Hollow Forces Adv. – Impact – Prolif 41

Hollow Forces Adv. – Impact – Asian Instability 42

Hollow Forces Adv. – Impact – Afghan Instability – Taliban Power 43

Hollow Forces Adv. – Impact – Taliban = Nuclear War 44

Hollow Forces Adv. – Impact – Taliban = Nuclear War 45

Hollow Forces Adv. – Impact – Oil Prices 46

Hollow Forces Adv. – Impact – Afghan Instability – Nuclear War 47

Hollow Forces Adv. – Impact – Afghan Instability – Nuclear War 48

Hollow Forces Adv. – Impact – Afghan Instability – Nuclear War 49

Hollow Forces Adv. – Impact – China Econ 50

Hollow Forces Adv. – Impact – Asian Wars/ Indo Pak War 51

Hollow Forces Adv. – A2: PMC’s Can Solve 52

Geneva Conventions – Uniqueness – PMC’s Violate 53

Geneva Conventions – Uniqueness – PMC’s Violate 54

Geneva Conventions – Uniqueness – PMC’s Violate 55

Geneva Conventions – Uniqueness – PMC’s Violate 56

Geneva Conventions – Uniqueness – PMC’s Violate 57

Geneva Conventions – Uniqueness – PMC’s Violate 58

Geneva Conventions – Link – Plan Key 59

Geneva Conventions – Link – Congress Key 60

Geneva Conventions – I/L – US K2 Geneva Cred 61

Geneva Conventions – Impact – Bioterrorism 62

Geneva Conventions – I/L – Civilian Casualties 63

Geneva Conventions – Impact – Civilian Casualties 64

Geneva Conventions – Democracy Module – Undermine the State 65

Geneva Conventions – Democracy Module – Undermine the State 66

Geneva Conventions – Democracy Module – Undermine Demo 67

Geneva Conventions – Democracy Module – Undermine Democracy 68

Geneva Conventions – Democracy Module – Undermine Democracy 69

Geneva Conventions – Democracy Module – Emerging Democracies 70

Geneva Conventions – Democracy Module – Emerging Demo 71

Geneva Conventions – Democracy Module – Famine 72

Geneva Conventions – Democracy Module – Deterrence 73

Geneva Conventions – Democracy Module – Free Trade 74

Geneva Conventions – Democracy Module – Genocide 75

Geneva Conventions – A2: Not Specially Recruited 76

Geneva Conventions – A2: Corporate Exemption 77

Credibility Adv. – 1AC – Uniqueness 78

Credibility Adv. – 1AC – Soft Power Scenario (1/2) 79

Credibility Adv. – 1AC – Soft Power Scenario (2/2) 80

Credibility Adv. – Uniqueness – Human Rights 81

Credibility Adv. – I/L – Human Rights 82

Credibility Adv. – I/L – Human Rights 83

Credibility Adv. – I/L – Human Rights 84

Credibility Adv. – I/L – HRC in Iraq/Afghanistan Key 85

Credibility Adv. – I/L – Hurts US Credibility 86

Credibility Adv. – I/L – Hurts US Credibility 87

Credibility Adv. – I/L – Hurts US Credibility 88

Credibility Adv. – I/L – Hurts US Credibility 89

Credibility Adv. – I/L – Hurts US Credibility 90

Credibility Adv. – I/L – Hurts US Credibility 91

Credibility Adv. – I/L – Torture Bad – US Credibility 92

Credibility Adv. – I/L – Torture Bad – US Credibility 93

Credibility Adv. – I/L – Torture Bad – US Credibility 94

Credibility Adv. – I/L – Torture Bad – US Credibility 95

Credibility Adv. – China Module – US Credibility K2 96

Credibility Adv. – China Module – US Credibility K2 97

Credibility Adv. – China Module – US Credibility K2 98

Credibility Adv. – China Module – China Civil Unrest 99

Credibility Adv. – China Module – Collapses CCP 100

Credibility Adv. – China Module – Collapses China 101

Credibility Adv. – China Module – Taiwan Impact 102

Credibility Adv. – Impact – Human Rights 103

Credibility Adv. – Impact – Torture Bad 104

Credibility Adv. – Impact – US Credibility/Soft Power 105

Credibility Adv. – Impact – Soft Power K2 Warming 106

PMC’s Bad – National Security 107

PMC’s Bad – National Security 108

PMC’s Bad – Security Coalitions 109

PMC’s Bad – Profit Motive 110

PMC’s Bad – Profit Motive 111

PMC’s Bad – Profit Motive 112

PMC’s Bad – Covert Ops Bad 113

PMC’s Bad – Fraud 114

PMC’s Bad – War 115

PMC’s Bad – War 116

PMC’s Bad – War 117

PMC’s Bad – War 118

PMC’s Bad – Conflict Escalation 119

PMC’s Bad – Lower The Cost Of War 120

PMC’s Bad – Prolong and Cause Wars 121

PMC’s Bad – Outsourcing War Bad 122

PMC’s Bad – Rape 123

PMC’s Bad – Genocide/Terrorism 124

PMC’s Bad – Bad people 125

PMC’s Bad – Vulnerability 126

PMC’s Bad – Don’t Solve 127

A2: PMC’s Good 128

Readiness – 1AC – Uniqueness 129

Readiness – 1AC – Professionalism Scenario (1/3) 130

Readiness – 1AC – Professionalism Scenario (2/3) 131

Readiness – 1AC – Professionalism Scenario (3/3) 132

Readiness – 1AC – Retention Scenario (1/5) 133

Readiness – 1AC – Retention Scenario (2/5) 134

Readiness – 1AC – Retention Scenario (3/5) 135

Readiness – 1AC – Retention Scenario (4/5) 136

Readiness – 1AC – Retention Scenario (5/5) 137

Readiness – Uniqueness – No Oversight Now 138

Readiness – Uniqueness – Dependent on PMC’s Now 139

Readiness – Uniqueness – Dependent on PMC’s Now 140

Readiness – Uniqueness – No End Strength Now 141

Readiness – I/L – General 142

Readiness – I/L – General 143

Readiness – I/L – General 144

Readiness – I/L – General 145

Readiness – I/L – Casualty Aversion 146

Readiness – I/L – End Strength 147

Readiness – I/L – Professionalism 148

Readiness – I/L – Professionalism 149

Readiness – I/L – Professionalism – Instability 150

Readiness – I/L – Professionalism – Instability 151

Readiness – I/L – Unit Cohesion 152

Readiness – I/L – Unit Cohesion Key to Retention 153

Readiness – I/L – Morale 154

Readiness – I/L – Morale 155

Readiness – I/L – Morale 156

Readiness – I/L – Morale 157

Readiness – I/L – Morale and Retention 158

Readiness – I/L – Morale Key to Readiness 159

Readiness – I/L – Morale Key to Readiness 160

Readiness – I/L – Generic Retention 161

Readiness – I/L – US Retention 162

Readiness – I/L – US Retention 163

Readiness – I/L – US Retention 164

Readiness – I/L – US Retention 165

Readiness – I/L – US Retention 166

Readiness – I/L – 5 Star Generals Retention 167

Readiness – I/L – Retention Key to Heg 168

Readiness – I/L – Ground Forces Key 169

Readiness – Impact – Solves War 170

Readiness – Impact – Threat Perception 171

Readiness – Impact – Miscalculation 172

Readiness – Impact – North Korea 173

Readiness – Impact – North Korea 174

Readiness – Impact – North Korea 175

Readiness – Impact – Iraq Instability – Terrorism 176

Readiness – Impact – Economy 177

Readiness – Impact – Economy 178

CMR Adv. – I/L 179

CMR Adv. – I/L 180

CMR Adv. – I/L 181

CMR Adv. – Impact – Conflict Mitigation 182

CMR Adv. – Impact – Extinction 183

CMR Adv. – Impact – Extinction 184

CMR Adv. – Impact - Genocide 185

CMR Adv. – Impact – Iraq 186

I-Law – Legal Accountability Good 187

I-Law – Legal Accountability Good 188

I-Law Adv. – 1AC– Internals 1/2 189

I-Law Adv. – 1AC– Internals 2/2 190

I-Law Adv. – 1AC – Leadership Module 1/4 191

I-Law Adv. – 1AC – Leadership Module 2/4 192

I-Law Adv. – 1AC – Leadership Module 3/4 193

I-Law Adv. – 1AC – Leadership Module 4/4 194

I-Law Adv. – 2AC – Solves Everything Module 195

I-Law Adv. – 2AC – PMC’s = No I-Law 196

I-Law Adv. – Solvency 197

I-Law Adv. – Impact – Human Rights 198

I-Law Adv. – Impact – Laundry List 199

I-Law Adv. – Impact – Biodiversity 200

I-Law Adv. – Impact – Self-Determination 201

I-Law Adv – A2: Link Takeouts 202

Executive Power Bad Adv. – 1AC 1/8 203

Executive Power Bad Adv. – 1AC 2/8 204

Executive Power Bad Adv. – 1AC 3/8 205

Executive Power Bad Adv. – 1AC 4/8 206

Executive Power Bad Adv. – 1AC 5/8 207

Executive Power Bad Adv. – 1AC 6/8 208

Executive Power Bad Adv. – 1AC 7/8 209

Executive Power Bad Adv. – 1AC 8/8 210

Executive Power Bad Adv. – Solvency 211

Executive Power Bad Adv. – I/L – PMC’s = Exec 212

Executive Power Bad Adv. – I/L – PMC’s = Exec 213

Executive Power Bad Adv. – I/L – PMC’s = Exec 214

Executive Power Bad Adv. – I/L – Accountability 215

Executive Power Bad Adv. – I/L – Accountability 216

Executive Power Bad Adv. – I/L – Accountability 217

Executive Power Bad Adv. – I/L – Accountability 218

Executive Power Bad Adv. – I/L – Destroys Democratic Checks 219

Executive Power Bad Adv. – I/L – Destroys Democratic Checks 1AC 220

Counterinsurgency Add-On – 2AC 221

Counterinsurgency Add-On – 2AC 222

Counterinsurgency Add-On – I/L – Hurt Hearts/Minds 223

Counterinsurgency Add-On – I/L – Key to Stability 224

Unilateralism Bad Adv. – PMC’s = Unilateralism 225

Unilateralism Bad Adv. – PMC’s = Unilateralism 226

Unilateralism Bad Adv. – PMC’s = Unilateralism 227

Unilateralism Bad Adv. – Impact 228

Unilateralism Bad Adv. – Impact 229

War on Drugs Add-On – Uniqueness – Warlords 230

War on Drugs Add-On – Solvency 231

War on Drugs Add-On – Warlords Module (1/3) 232

War on Drugs Add-On – Warlords Module (2/3) 233

War on Drugs Add-On – Warlords Module (3/3) 234

War on Drugs Add-On – Uniqueness – Funded by PMC’s 235

War on Drugs Add-On – Uniqueness – Funded by PMC’s 236

War on Drugs Add-On – Uniqueness – Funded by PMC’s 237

War on Drugs Add-On – Uniqueness – Funded by U.S. 238

War on Drugs Add-On – I/L – Hurts War on Drugs 239

War on Drugs Add-On – Impact – War on Drugs Good 240

Spending Adv. – PMC Profits 241

Spending Adv. – Uniqueness – Military Spending High 242

Spending Adv. – Link – Trades Off 243

Spending Adv. – Link – Trades Off 244

Spending Adv. – Link – Trades Off 245

Spending Adv. – I/L – No Oversight 246

Spending Adv. – I/L – No Oversight 247

Spending Adv. – I/L – Hidden Costs 248

Spending Adv. – I/L – Hidden Costs 249

Spending Adv. – I/L – Hidden Costs 250

Spending Adv. – I/L – Hidden Costs 251

Spending Adv. – Impact – Housing Module (1/3) 252

Spending Adv. – Impact – Housing Module (2/3) 253

Spending Adv. – Impact – Housing Module (3/3) 254

Spending Adv. – Impact – Russia Module (1/3) 255

Spending Adv. – Impact – Russia Module (2/3) 256

Spending Adv. – Impact – Russia Module (3/3) 257

Canadian JTF Adv. – 1AC – Uniqueness and I/L 258

Canadian JTF Adv. – 1AC – Soft Power Scenario (1/2) 259

Canadian JTF Adv. – 1AC – Soft Power Scenario (2/2) 260

Canadian JTF Adv. – 1AC – I-Law Module 261

Canadian JTF Adv. – 1AC – Quebec Scenario (1/3) 262

Canadian JTF Adv. – 1AC – Quebec Scenario (2/3) 263

Canadian JTF Adv. – 1AC – Quebec Scenario (3/3) 264

Canadian JTF Adv. – 1AC – Arctic Conflict 265

Canadian JTF Adv. – 1AC – Arctic Conflict 266

British Special Forces Adv. (1/3) 267

British Special Forces Adv. (2/3) 268

British Special Forces Adv. (3/3) 269

Spec. Ops. Adv. – 1AC – Colombia Module (1/5) 270

Spec. Ops. Adv. – 1AC – Colombia Module (2/5) 271

Spec. Ops. Adv. – 1AC – Colombia Module (3/5) 272

Spec. Ops. Adv. – 1AC – Colombia Module (4/5) 273

Spec. Ops. Adv. – 1AC – Colombia Module (5/5) 274

Spec. Ops. Adv. – Uniqueness 275

Spec. Ops. Adv. – I/L – PMC’s Steal Spec. Ops. 276

Spec. Ops. Adv. – I/L – PMC’s Steal Spec. Ops. 277

Spec. Ops. Adv. – I/L – Training Colombia 278

Spec. Ops. Adv. – Colombia Module – Heg 279

Spec. Ops. Adv. – Colombia Module – China Econ 280

Spec. Ops. Adv. – Impact – Spec. Ops. Good 281

Spec. Ops. Adv. – Impact – Military Adventurism 282

Spec. Ops. Adv. – Impact – Military Adventurism 283

Gonzaga Debate Institute 2010 56

Scholars PMC’s Aff

Inherency – 1AC – Congress

Status quo ideas of “inherently governmental functions” are too vague – reform is needed.

Luckey, Grasso and Manuel 10 (“Inherently Governmental Functions and Department of Defense Operations: Background, Issues, and Options for Congress” John R. Legislative Attorney Valerie Bailey Specialist in Defense Acquisition Kate M. Legislative Attorney February 1, http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/natsec/R40641.pdf)KM

One common theme in the recent literature on inherently governmental functions is that there are numerous and/or inconsistent definitions of inherently governmental functions within federal law and policy. For example, in its report on the Duncan Hunter National Defense Authorization Act for FY2009, the House of Representatives noted that the task of determining which functions must be performed by government employees: ... is made even more difficult by the lack of a single definition and accompanying guidance on what constitutes an “inherently governmental function.” Currently, the Federal Acquisition Regulation defines that term in multiple places, the Office of Management and Budget Circular A-76 also defines the term, and there is yet another definition in the Federal Activities Inventory Reform Act (P.L. 105-270). There is also the additional DOD-specific definition of [functions] “closely associated with inherently governmental functions.”168 Similarly, in its report Changing the Culture of Pentagon Contracting, the New America Foundation noted that the phrase “inherently governmental functions” appears 15 times in the United States Code “without a clear or consistent definition.”169 Commentators raising this point appear to be suggesting that agencies would not contract out allegedly inherently governmental functions if (1) they did not have to determine which definition applied in particular cases and/or (2) they had clear definitions to guide their decision making in particular cases.