FIG. 1. Phylogenetic Tree Constructed from Sequences of the Aaca2 Locus of Leptospira Strains

File 1:

FIG. 1. Phylogenetic tree constructed from sequences of the aacA2 locus of Leptospira strains. The number of the strains, the serogroups, and the serovars (in parentheses) are indicated. Gri., Grippotyphosa; Ict., Icterohaemorragiae. The Neighbor-Joining method (18) was used for sequence comparison. Phylogenetic analysis was conducted in MEGA4 (21). The evolutionary distances were computed using the Maximum Composite Likelihood method (22). Only bootstrap values greater than 70 are shown.

File 2:

FIG. 2. Phylogenetic tree constructed from sequences of the ccmf locus of Leptospira strains. The number of the strains, the serogroups, and the serovars (in parentheses) are indicated. Gri., Grippotyphosa; Ict., Icterohaemorragiae. The Neighbor-Joining method (18) was used for sequence comparison. Phylogenetic analysis was conducted in MEGA4 (21). The evolutionary distances were computed using the Maximum Composite Likelihood method (22). Only bootstrap values greater than 70 are shown.

File 3:

FIG. 3. Phylogenetic tree constructed from sequences of the czcA locus of Leptospira strains. The number of the strains, the serogroups, and the serovars (in parentheses) are indicated. Gri., Grippotyphosa; Ict., Icterohaemorragiae. The Neighbor-Joining method (18) was used for sequence comparison. Phylogenetic analysis was conducted in MEGA4 (21). The evolutionary distances were computed using the Maximum Composite Likelihood method (22). Only bootstrap values greater than 70 are shown.

File 4:

FIG. 4. Phylogenetic tree constructed from sequences of the gcvP locus of Leptospira strains. The number of the strains, the serogroups, and the serovars (in parentheses) are indicated. Gri., Grippotyphosa; Ict., Icterohaemorragiae. The Neighbor-Joining method (18) was used for sequence comparison. Phylogenetic analysis was conducted in MEGA4 (21). The evolutionary distances were computed using the Maximum Composite Likelihood method (22). Only bootstrap values greater than 70 are shown.

File 5:

FIG. 5. Phylogenetic tree constructed from sequences of the groEL locus of Leptospira strains. The number of the strains, the serogroups, and the serovars (in parentheses) are indicated. Gri., Grippotyphosa; Ict., Icterohaemorragiae. The Neighbor-Joining method (18) was used for sequence comparison. Phylogenetic analysis was conducted in MEGA4 (21). The evolutionary distances were computed using the Maximum Composite Likelihood method (22). Only bootstrap values greater than 70 are shown.

File 6:

FIG. 6. Phylogenetic tree constructed from sequences of the polA locus of Leptospira strains. The number of the strains, the serogroups, and the serovars (in parentheses) are indicated. Gri., Grippotyphosa; Ict., Icterohaemorragiae. The Neighbor-Joining method (18) was used for sequence comparison. Phylogenetic analysis was conducted in MEGA4 (21). The evolutionary distances were computed using the Maximum Composite Likelihood method (22). Only bootstrap values greater than 70 are shown.

File 7:

FIG. 7. Phylogenetic tree constructed from sequences of the recF locus of Leptospira strains. The number of the strains, the serogroups, and the serovars (in parentheses) are indicated. Gri., Grippotyphosa; Ict., Icterohaemorragiae. The Neighbor-Joining method (18) was used for sequence comparison. Phylogenetic analysis was conducted in MEGA4 (21). The evolutionary distances were computed using the Maximum Composite Likelihood method (22). Only bootstrap values greater than 70 are shown.