CERAMIC ROTATION BRACKETS

B. Donald McGann, DDS

Abstract

Rotation control has been a particular weakness of plastic and ceramic bracket products, when compared to their metal counterpart. An appliance and technique resulting in full or over-correction of rotations on a single patient basis is presented. This product, combined with the diagnosis of rotations for each case results in a significant improvement in the clinical efficiency of ceramic brackets.

By indirect bonding a patient specific customized appliance to improve bracket positioning, archwire compensations for rotation correction can be eliminated. The traditional ceramic debonding problem is solved by using a custom pad technique for the indirect bonding.

Since the introduction of plastic brackets and later ceramic, improved esthetics during orthodontic treatment has been requested by the adult population. Many adolescent girls also prefer the improved esthetics of clear or tooth colored brackets. Lingual orthodontics is the ultimate cosmetic solution, but treatment complexity is great, and the cost of treatment beyond the resources of many patients.

So why are there still metal appliances? Simple, the metal is easier to work with and is better engineered and manufactured. Better engineering means less wire bending, and less chair time for the orthodontist. Rotation has been a particular weakness of plastic and ceramic appliances. (4-7) Full rotation correction has been made possible on an individual patient diagnosis and appliance application when using the IP Applianceâ (1).

figure 1: IP Applianceâ ceramic brackets 5-5 upper and lower with 014 nickel-titanium archwire. Variable torque and rotations have been applied.

Rotation Capabilities

Improved rotation capabilities can be found with the individual patient, IP Appliance®* ceramic bracket, by inserting a specially designed “wedge” into the archwire slot. The wedges are available in 4, 6, and 8 degrees to allow for full or over-correction of rotations, by simply changing the wedge engaged in the archwire slot. 4-Degree rotation has been shown with IP Appliance® metal brackets to fully correct rotations in the first alignment archwires.

The slot of IP Appliance® ceramic rotation brackets is cut deeper to allow for the insertion of the specially designed wedge. Different wedges are used for the smaller lower anterior brackets than other brackets from 5-5, upper and lower, the difference being the mesial-distal width of the bracket. The removable wedge is inserted into the slot before engagement of the archwire, maintaining the esthetics of the ceramic bracket.

The end, or tip, of the wedge is positioned into the bracket slot in the direction of the rotation. Teeth rotated so the facial surface faces the midline are diagnosed as mesial rotations. The tip of the wedge would be positioned to the mesial. Distal rotated teeth would have the tip of the wedge positioned to the distal.

Figure2: lateral incisors start with Distal rotations, the facial surface facing away from the midline. IP Ceramic with 6° wedges in the bracket slot, creating an over-correction to a mesial rotation.

Figure 3: IP Applianceâ ceramic rotation wedges are placed into the special deep-cut slot. Wedges are available in 4, 6, and 8 degrees, with one size for the lower incisors and another for all other brackets. A 4 degree rotation wedge with the archwire engaged to correct a “mesial” rotation.

Figure 6: Wedges are removed from the “tree” with a mosquito hemostat and placed into the slot by holding the edge with a placement instrument as the tab is broken off. The end of the wedge determines the rotation direction. Mesial rotations are corrected by placing the end of the wedge towards the mesial during placement.

Rotation Wedge Placement

The rotation wedges are removed from the dispensing tree with a mosquito hemostat and carried to the bracket slot. The end of the wedge points towards the direction of the rotation classification. Mesial rotations are corrected by placing the end of the wedge towards the mesial. The archwire is tied over the top of the wedge to secure the wedge to the bracket.

Figure 7: Rotation wedges are positioned under the archwire.

Protocol

Initial alignment using 012 or 014 nickel-titanium archwires, in any shape and size, are first applied without rotation wedges. The smaller gauge archwires may allow the wedge to “roll” in the slot. Secondary alignment using 18x25 heat activated nickel-titanium (or 016N) in the desired arch shape and size is then applied with 4-degree wedges. The archwire is cooled and retied during the next 4-6 months, establishing the torque and archform.

Full correction of rotations is then confirmed by comparing the initial study models to the alignment result. If any under-corrections still exist, then 6-degree wedges are applied to these teeth. 8-degree wedges may be used for the over-correction of severe rotations.

The wedges remain in the slot during the mechanics stage, being replaced only if lost. After completion of mechanics, a second comparison of the rotations is made using the initial study models. Wedges are adjusted as necessary to obtain the desired over-correction or full correction of rotations.

The best appliance for the individual treatment was decided upon, considering the following features:

1. Rotations: Tooth rotations were classified and prepared for ordering

Treatment started with alignment, using 012 nickel-titanium archwires lower and 014 nickel titanium upper. At 7 weeks, 4° rotation wedges were inserted on the lower incisors, which were rotated mesial. At 11 weeks, the wedges were changed to 6° at a wire change to 016 nickel-titanium, medium ovoid archform.

Initial bonding 7 weeks 13 weeks

The wedges remained in the slot as archwires were changed to 19x25 stainless steel for mechanics. The patient proved to be quite non-compliant, loosing 11 brackets and 4 bands in the 16 months of treatment. The patient forced extra visits at short intervals, 2-3 weeks being typical, and applied double elastic force, thinking this would speed her treatment. Archwire distortion and excess upper incisor detorquing was the result of these excessive forces. Our typical scheduled appointment interval is 8-10 weeks.

The patient demanded the appliances be removed at 16 months treatment time, signing a waiver.

Comparison of study models to show rotation correction

There is a slight over-correction of the lower incisor rotations.

Conclusion

Ceramic bracket rotation control has been less functional than using metal appliances. Individual patient diagnosis of upper and lower tooth rotations allows the selection of a ceramic bracket with pre-manufactured features to improve treatment results and clinical efficiency. Such an appliance significantly removes the need for bracket repositioning and placing archwire compensations, reducing the amount of doctor time required for ceramic bracket treatment.

Indirect bonding of the ceramic bracket with custom pads has eliminated the problem of ceramic debonding, at the same time improving bracket positioning. This new system should renew your interest in the cosmetic bracket treatment option.

*IP Applianceâ is a registered trademark of Individual Orthodontics, 1701 East Edinger, suite C1, Santa Ana, CA 92705. 1-800-737-0720

**IPSoftä is a trademark used by Progressive America, Inc. 1701 East Edinger, suite C1, Santa Ana, CA 92705

***Transbond XTä, Sondhiä Rapid Set , and Clarityä are trademarks used by 3M Unitek, 2724 S. Peck Road, Monrovia, CA 91016

References

1. McGann BD: “Individual Patient Appliance Diagnosis”. World Orthod J, accepted and waiting publication.

2. Gibbs, SL: “Clinical performance of ceramic brackets: a survey of British Orthodontists’ experience” Br J Orthod 1992 Aug;19(3):191-7.

3. Lee RT: “Evaluation of the clinical performance of the Transcend orthodontic bracket”. Eur J Orthod 1997 Oct;19(5):609-10

4. Andrews LF: Lawrence F. Andrews, DDS on the Straight-Wire Appliance. J Clin Orthod. 1990 Aug;24(8):493-508.

5. Redd TB, Shivapuja PK: “Debonding ceramic brackets; effects on enamel” J Clin Orthod 1991 Aug;25(8):475-81.

6. Franklin S, Garcia-Godoy F: “Shear bond strengths and effects on enamel of two ceramic brackets”. J Clin Orthod 1993 Feb;27(2):83-8.

7. Viazis AD, Nakajima H, Kleven JS:”Shear bond strengths of three new ceramic brackets:. J Clin Orthod 1993 Oct;27(10):539-42.

8. Bishara SE, Olsen ME, VonWald L, Jakobsen JR: “Comparison of the debonding characteristics of two innovative ceramic bracket designs”. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1999 Jul;116(1):86-92.

9. Pannes D, Bailey D, Thompson J, Pietz D: “Orthodontic bonding to porcelain: a comparison of bonding systems”. J Prosthet Dent 2003 Jan;89(1):66-9.

10. Theodorakopoulou L, Sadowsky P, Jacobson A, Lacefield W: “Evaluation of the debonding characteristics of 2 ceramic brackets:an in vitro study” Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004 Mar;125(3):329-36.

11. Sondhi A., Efficient and Effective indirect bonding, American Journal of Orthodontics and dentofacial orthodedics, 1999 No.4 April, 115:352-59.

12. Machata, WC: Indirect Bonding Custom Base. Good Practice (American Orthodontics) Vol.4 No1, 2003.

13. Geenty, JP: Indirect Bonding. Australian Orthodontic Journal, Oct 1994; 13(3):182-185.

14. Klocke, A; Shi, J; Kahl-Nieke, B; Bismayer U: Bond strength with custom base indirect bonding techniques. Angle Orthodontist, Vol 73, No.2, April 2003, pp176-180.