الجامعة الإسلامية – غزة
شئون البحث العلمي والدراسات العليا / / Islamic University of Gaza
Research and Graduate Affairs
Reviewer Form – IUG Journal
Basic Information
Paper Title
Reviewer Information / Family / Grandfather / Father / Name First / Mobile no.
Academic title / Institution
College / Department
Major Field / Specialization Field
Date of PhD / Place of PhD
Email

Due to the importance of having high quality research in IUG journal, and to keep author (s) rights, please note the following:

1-  The review is part of a double-blinded review process in which the identity of the authors and the reviewers are masked.

2-  The paper should not be shown to anyone without permission from the journal.

3-  Evaluate the paper based on the items shown in the following sections with writing comments for each item when it is necessary. Please be as specific as possible.

4-  Send your recommendation within three weeks from the date of paper’s receipt.

5-  $30 will be sent to the reviewer account within three months of reviewing date.

Paper Review

Please, evaluate the paper based on to the following items:

For Score: 1= Poor, 2 = Below average, 3 = Average, 4 = Good, 5 = Excellent

No. / Item / Comments / Score /
1.  / To what extent is the literature review adequate and comprehensive
2.  / How convincingly have the author (s) justified the proposed research?
3.  / To what extent is the paper original, creative and makes a significant contribution to the body of knowledge
4.  / To what extent are the objectives clear and likely to be achieved?
5.  / To what extent the proposed methodology is appropriate for the research?
6.  / Clarity of statistical analysis tools and their suitability to the proposed research
7.  / Will the outcome of the proposed research contribute to the transfer of knowledge and technology?
8.  / The paper has clarity of presentation. It is well organized, clearly written.
9.  / Authentication and the list of references
10.  / To what extent does the author (s) follow the publishing rules?

Research quality and recommendations

Does the paper has similarity to the other papers in the literature (mention them)?
General remarks, comments and recommendations of reviewer.
Reviewer recommendation / Accept as is
Conditionally accept with minor revisions
Reconsider after major revisions
Reject
paper’s receipt date / Reviewing date
رقم الإصدار/التعديل: 2/0 / تاريخ الإصدار: ديسمبر، 2015 / Page 1 of 3