BIL:3398

TYP:General Bill GB

INB:House

IND:19990128

PSP:Robinson

SPO:Robinson, Kelley, Simrill, H.Brown, Sandifer, Fleming, Easterday, McKay, Rice, Leach, D.Smith, Hamilton, Klauber, Trotter, Haskins, Harrison, Vaughn, Barrett

DDN:l:\council\bills\gjk\20180sd99.doc

RBY:Senate

LAD:19990406

SUB:Courts, Attorneys fees; awarding of in state initiated actions, administrative proceedings; Torts

HST:

BodyDateAction DescriptionComLeg Involved

______

------20000601Scrivener's error corrected

Senate20000531Recalled from Committee,11 SJ

placed on the Calendar

Senate19990408Introduced, read first time,11 SJ

referred to Committee

House19990407Read third time, sent to Senate

House19990406Amended, read second time

House19990331Debate adjourned until

Tuesday, 19990406

House19990325Committee report: Favorable with25 HJ

amendment

House19990128Introduced, read first time,25 HJ

referred to Committee

Versions of This Bill

Revised on 19990325

Revised on 19990406

Revised on 20000531

Revised on 20000601

TXT:

Indicates Matter Stricken

Indicates New Matter

RECALLED

May 31, 2000

H.3398

Introduced by Reps. Robinson, Kelley, Simrill, H.Brown, Sandifer, Fleming, Easterday, McKay, Rice, Leach, D.Smith, Hamilton, Klauber, Trotter, Haskins, Harrison, Vaughn and Barrett

S. Printed 5/31/00--S.[SEC 6/1/00 4:40 PM]

Read the first time April 8, 1999.

STATEMENT OF ESTIMATED FISCAL IMPACT

ESTIMATED FISCAL IMPACT ON GENERAL FUND EXPENDITURES IS:

A Cost to the General Fund of the State (See Below)

ESTIMATED FISCAL IMPACT ON FEDERAL & OTHER FUND EXPENDITURES IS:

$0 (No additional expenditures or savings are expected)

EXPLANATION OF GENERAL FUND IMPACT:

Attorney General’s Office

The Attorney General’s office forecasts a potential cost to the General Fund of the State pursuant to Section 15-77-300. However, the Attorney General’s office notes that the amount is currently not quantifiable. Pointing out that the passage of the bill would certainly expose the state to a greater liability, the Attorney General’s office notes that the liability would result from the inclusion of proceedings that are either brought by or against the state as opposed to only proceedings brought by the state.

Regarding the proposed amendment, the Attorney General’s office projects that passage of this bill will still open the state up to a material liability that is not quantifiable. The reasoning for this is that liability will be increased by amending Section 1577300 to include that in any action, regardless of which party brings the action, the prevailing private party may be awarded fees against the state. The decision to award fees will be determined by a tribunal, which implies more than one person will have to agree on such award.

Administrative Law Judge Division

The Administrative Law Judge Division forecasts no potential cost to the General Fund of the State with the passage of the proposed legislation.

Approved By:

Don Addy

Office of State Budget

[3398-1]

A BILL

TO AMEND SECTION 1577300, CODE OF LAWS OF SOUTH CAROLINA, 1976, RELATING TO THE AWARDING OF ATTORNEY’S FEES IN STATE INITIATED ACTIONS, SO AS TO FURTHER PROVIDE FOR THE AWARDING OF ATTORNEY’S FEES IN SUCH ACTIONS AND IN ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEEDINGS; AND TO AMEND SECTION 1577310, RELATING TO PETITIONING FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES, SO AS TO REVISE THE TIME WITHIN WHICH THE PREVAILING PARTY MUST PETITION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES AND TO PERMIT A PETITION FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES IN ADMINISTRATIVE ACTIONS.

Be it enacted by the General Assembly of the State of South Carolina:

SECTION1.Section 1577300 of the 1976 Code is amended to read:

“Section 15-77-300.In any civil action brought by the State, any political subdivision of the State or any party who is contesting state action, unless the prevailing party is the State or any political subdivision of the State, the court may allow the prevailing party to recover reasonable attorney’s fees to be taxed as court costs against the appropriate agency if:

(1)The court finds that the agency acted without substantial justification in pressing its claim against the party; and

(2)The court finds that there are no special circumstances that would make the award of attorney’s fees unjust.

In any civil action or administrative proceeding, a prevailing private party may be awarded attorney’s fees against the State, or a political subdivision or agency of the State, if the court, chief procurement officer, administrative law judge, procurement review panel, or other appropriate tribunal finds that:

(1)the State, or a political subdivision or agency of the State, acted without substantial justification in bringing or defending its claims against the prevailing private party; and

(2)there are no special circumstances that would make the award of attorney’s fees unjust.

The provisions of this section do not apply to civil actions relating to the establishment of public utility rates, disciplinary actions by state licensing boards, habeas corpus or post conviction relief actions, child support actions, except as otherwise provided for herein, and child abuse and neglect actions, except as provided by law.”

SECTION2.Section 1577310 of the 1976 Code is amended to read:

“Section 1577310.TheA private party entitled to attorney’s fees shall petition for the attorney’s fees within thirty days following the later of:

(1)final disposition of the case.; or

(2)the issuance of a final administrative decision.

The petition must be supported by an affidavit setting forth the basis for the request.”

SECTION3.This act takes effect upon approval by the Governor.

XX

[3398]1