Supplementary Figures
1. Figures ofmeta-analysis of clinicopathological features
1.1 miR-21
1.1.1 the relation between miR-21 and gender of gastric cancer patients
Forest plot Funnel plot
1.1.2 the relation between miR-21 and of cell grade of gastric cancer
Forest plot Funnel plot
1.1.3 the relation between miR-21and of liver metastas of gastric cancer
Forest plot Funnel plot
1.1.4 the relation between miR-21and of peritoneal metastasis of gastric cancer
Forest plot Funnel plot
1.1.5 the relation between miR-21and of lymph node metastasis of gastric cancer
Forest plot Funnel plot
1.1.6 the relation between miR-21and of vascular invasion of gastric cancer
Forest plot Funnel plot
1.1.7 the relation between miR-21and TNM stage of gastric cancer
Forest plot Funnel plot
1.2 miR-27a
1.2.1 the relation between miR-27a and gender of gastric cancer patients
Forest plot Funnel plot
1.2.2 the relation between miR-27a and cell grade of gastric cancer
Forest plot Funnel plot
1.2.3 the relation between miR-27a and lymph node metastasis of gastric cancer
Forest plot Funnel plot
1.2.4 the relation between miR-27a and clinical stage of gastric cancer
Forest plot Funnel plot
1.3 miR-199-3p
1.3.1 the relation between miR-199-3p and gender of gastric cancer patients
Forest plot Funnel plot
1.3.2 the relation between miR-199-3p and cell gradeof gastric cancer patients
Forest plot Funnel plot
1.3.3 the relation between miR-199-3p and lymph node metastasis of gastric cancer patients
Forest plot Funnel plot
1.3.4 the relation between miR-199-3p and TNM stage of gastric cancer patients
Forest plot Funnel plot
1.4 miR-200b
1.4.1 the relation between miR-200b and gender of gastric cancer patients
Forest plot Funnel plot
1.4.2 the relation between miR-200b and lymph node metastasis of gastric
Forest plot Funnel plot
1.4.3 the relation between miR-200b and TNM of gastric cancer patients
Forest plot Funnel plot
1.4.4 the relation between miR-200b and Peritoneal metastasis of gastric cancer patients
Forest plot Funnel plot
1.4.5 the relation between miR-200b and cell grade of gastric cancer patients
Forest plot Funnel plot
1.4.6 the relation between miR-200b and Vascular Invasion of gastric cancer patients
Forest plot Funnel plot
1.5 miRNA200c
1.5.1 the relation between miR-200c and gender of gastric cancer patients
Forest plot Funnel plot
1.5.2 the relation between miR-200c and lymph node metastasis of gastric cancer patients
Forest plot Funnel plot
1.6 miR-301
1.6.1 the relation between miR-301 and gender of gastric cancer patients
Forest plot Funnel plot
1.6.2 the relation between miR-301 and cell grade of gastric cancer
Forest plot Funnel plot
1.6.3 the relation between miR-301 and lymph node metastasis of gastric cancer
Forest plot Funnel plot
1.6.4 the relation between miR-301 and TNM stage of gastric cancer
Forest plot Funnel plot
1.6.5 the relation between miR-301 and invasion depth of gastric cancer
Forest plot Funnel plot
1.7 H19
1.7.1 the relation between H19 and gender of gastric cancer patients
Forest plot Funnel plot
1.8 HOTAIR
1.8.1 the relation between HOTAIR and gender of gastric cancer patients
Forest plot Funnel plot
1.8.2 the relation between HOTAIR and tumor size of gastric cancer patients
Forest plot Funnel plot
1.8.3 the relation between HOTAIR and liver of gastric cancer patients
Forest plot Funnel plot
1.8.4 the relation between HOTAIR and lymph node metastasis of gastric cancer patients
Forest plot Funnel plot
1.8.5 the relation between HOTAIR and vascular invasion of gastric cancer patients
Forest plot Funnel plot
- Figures ofdiagnostic meta-analysis
2.1 miR-21
pooled sensitivity pooled specificity
DOR SROC
2.2 miR-451
pooled sensitivity pooled specificity
DOR
2.3 miR-486-5p
pooled sensitivity pooled specificity
DOR
- Figures ofprognostic meta-analysis
3.1 miR-17-5p
metan lnHR lnLL lnUL, label (namevar=study) random eform
Test of ES=1: z= 0.85 p = 0.394
Forest plot
3.2 miR-20a
metan lnHR lnLL lnUL, label (namevar=study) fixed eform
Test of ES=1 : z= 2.47 p = 0.014
3.3 miR-20b
metan lnHR lnLL lnUL, label(namevar=study) fixed eform
Test of ES=1 : z=1.36 p = 0.173
3.4 miR-21
metan lnHR lnLL lnUL, label(namevar=study) fixed eform
Test of ES=1 : z=3.76 p < 0.001
Forest plot
3.5 miR-107
metan lnHR lnLL lnUL, label(namevar=study) random eform
Test of ES=1 : z= 0.34 p = 0.731
Forest plot
3.6 miR-143
metan lnHR lnLL lnUL, label(namevar=study) fixed eform
Test of ES=1 : z= 2.41 p = 0.016
Forest plot
3.7 HOTAIR
metan lnHR lnLL lnUL, label(namevar=study) random eform
Test of ES=1:z= 0.09 p = 0.925